Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ШБмнк

@shbmnk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,699subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001087284802
TypeChannel
Username@shbmnk
DescriptionНовости медицины, которые вы проспали. Рассказывает и показывает Оля Кашубина. Обратная связь: @kashubina
Created28 September 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shbmnk

Growth

7,6977,6997,6985 August 2026 — 7,698 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,698 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,697 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,699 subscribers5 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,697–7,699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 20:447,699+2
9 Aug 2026, 07:117,697-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:067,698no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:007,698first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 7,699 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (11 March 202630 July 2026)
Views total5,555
Reactions total77
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
222
Videos
7
Links
856

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

453 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30266.7%
🔥6213.7%
👍316.84%
🙏183.97%
🥰143.09%
😢112.43%
😁91.99%
👏40.883%
👎10.221%
💩10.221%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 453reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC675 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Опять не успеваю писать посты, да и вообще – ничего не успеваю, потому что летом жизнь как будто ускоряется до 1,5х! Из хорошего: успеваю записывать подкаст, потому что за этим следит наш редактор. Очередной выпуск про чекапы. Стоит ли за этим модным словом реальная польза для здоровья и можно ли сэкономить время на походы по врачам, если по результатам анализов со здоровьем все в порядке? Поговорили с хорошим тера

21

Signed Оля Кашубина

21 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,240 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Прямо сейчас на Серебряном Дожде болтаем в Виктором Набутовым про новые технологии в лечении рака! Попозже выложу запись, а то уже полэфира прошло, а я только вспомнила про анонс :) Смотреть и слушать: https://silver.ru/episodes/novye-metodiki-v-lechenii-i-profilaktike-onkologii-konveyer-vaktsin-crispr-cas9-i-monoklonalnye-anti/

21🔥2

Signed Оля Кашубина

15 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,070 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Теперь в "Приеме" будет немного больше уклона в лайфстайл темы – будем говорить и про психологию, и про уход за собой, и про демографию, и даже про атрибуты комфорта в личной жизни. Не вижу тут проблемы: медицинская экспертиза все равно остается в красном углу, но дополнительный контекст, надеюсь, уведет нас от скучных ЗОЖ-рекомендаций к поиску более глобальных ответов на вопрос "а зачем вообще все это нужно". И да

5🥰4👎1

Signed Оля Кашубина

15 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,450 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @t_priemPhoto

📌 Чудовище из «Аленького цветочка» 📌 Миа из «Дневника принцессы» 📌 Гадкий утенок из сказки Андерсена 📌 Белла из «Сумерек» 📌 Невилл Долгопупс из «Гарри Поттера» А ну-ка, сообразите, что объединяет всех этих персонажей? Правильный ответ: глоу-ап. Во втором выпуске сезона разбираемся, что это такое и насколько адекватно стремиться к преображениям. Способны ли классная стрижка и стильный гардероб заставить окружающих и

5

Signed Оля Кашубина

14 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,120 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А вы уже проверили свои банки через KremIQ? Я много писала о том, что космецевтика – еще более лукавая наука, нежели фармакология. Это значит, что верить обещаниям кремов сделать вашу кожу румяней и белее, а сывороток – моложе и плотнее, можно примерно как в эффективность БАДов. Это не отменяет того факта, что в составе уходовой косметике вполне могут быть эффективные компоненты, которые лечат акне или помогают увл

12🔥4👍1💩1

Signed Оля Кашубина

8 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,220 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @t_priemPhoto

Ура! Новый сезон «Приема» уже здесь! 💥 С вами снова Оля и внезапно Султан Настя! Куда подевался Султан и как мы теперь будем жить, узнаете в самом начале выпуска. А его основной темой станет инстамедицина: обсудим, почему под влиянием роликов из соцсетей нам хочется срочно потратить деньги на анализы и БАДы или поставить себе необычный диагноз. Можно ли доверять блогерам, на которых вы давно подписаны? В какой моме

8🔥8👍3

Signed Оля Кашубина

8 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,110 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Спустя почти год "Прием" возвращается с 6-м сезоном, на этот раз в еженедельном формате и с новым составом. Надеюсь, мы не растеряем легкости, экспертности и злободневности, а вы поддержите нас, пожалуйста, сердечками и комментариями на той платформе, где вы привыкли слушать подкасты!

17🔥8

Signed Оля Кашубина

19 Jun 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,730 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Очень важно поучаствовать до 22 июня! Пусть РАС как заболевание касается не каждого, но доказательный подход в формулировании клинических рекомендаций - это ценность, за которую стоит побороться в любом случае. Пересмотр клинических рекомендаций по аутизму. Что мы можем сделать? https://t-j.ru/peresmotr-klinicheskikh-rekomendatsii-po-autizmu/

11👍10

Signed Оля Кашубина

17 Jun 2026, 11:31 UTC≈2,010 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Немножко хороших новостей о деменции Вы наверняка слышали, что нейродегенеративные заболевания уверенно движутся вверх по чарту самых популярных причин смерти по всему миру. Но есть нюанс: во многом это связано с увеличением когорты людей старшего возраста, а не с какой-то эпидемией болезни Альцгеймера, которая захватывает все больше людей в принципе. Если говорить об относительных величинах – например, о заболеваем

41

Signed Оля Кашубина

1 Jun 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,650 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Большая хорошая новость: команды фондов “Не напрасно” и “Помощь рядом” сделали ИИ-ассистента, который отвечает на вопросы онкопациентов и их родственников. Если попросту, весь массив статей фонда “Не напрасно”, а также другие доказательные источники информации переплавили в мозг бота – он так и называется, “Не напрасно бот”, и теперь он может днем и ночью без устали и раздражения отвечать на вопросы встревоженных лю

22

Signed Оля Кашубина

20 May 2026, 12:30 UTC≈1,780 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vesnafundPhoto

Благотворительный фонд «Весна» приглашает на круглый стол «Информированный пациент: от патернализма к партнерству». Исследования подтверждают: когда пациент понимает свою болезнь и активно участвует в лечении, результаты улучшаются по всем направлениям. Крупный мета-анализ, объединивший данные почти 500 рандомизированных исследований, показал, что образовательные программы для пациентов с хроническими заболеваниями

6

Signed Оля Кашубина

20 May 2026, 12:30 UTC≈1,540 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Буквально через полчаса буду моделировать круглый стол о медицинской грамотности пациентов! Регистрируйтесь и присоединяйтесь онлайн, надеюсь, будет интересно :)

🔥3

Signed Оля Кашубина

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shbmnk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 637,208 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Заметки детского врача
@DrButriy · 138,283
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ШБмнк” (@shbmnk), 7,699 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shbmnk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.