Channel
@sharapovaaaaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
500subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001335553445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sharapovaaaaa |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sharapovaaaaa |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 500 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 499 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 501 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 500 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 501 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 501 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
125 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 125 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
обсудила ситуацию с коллегами-художниками, галеристами, юристами - в общем, варианта решения всего два (они актуальны и для любого другого вопроса): 1. бороться и добиваться справедливости (шансы, в целом довольно высокие) 2. забить и творить дальше вероятно, пойду по второму пути, но я верю в карму, так что… 😂😈 а вы бы как поступили? #offdutysituation
❤8
вот такой ‘сюрприз’ мне попался на просторах запрещенной соцсети сегодня точная отзеркаленная копия нашей с вами неваляшеньки ‘украшает’ стаканчики какой-то кофейни, по всей видимости, из Твери (я об этом, как вы понимаете, узнала сегодня впервые и несколько удивилась) если вдруг вам попадутся другие публикации с этой кружкой, поделитесь со мной, пожалуйста, хочется провести разъяснительную беседу об авторских прав…
❤10
прошу простить за минутку самолюбования но как же приятно, когда твои иллюстрации понравились одной из самых модных девушек планеты 🖤 p.s. вдвойне приятно, что это не была иллюстрация, посвященная Келли, она сама каким-то образом ее увидела и отметила *публикация содержит скриншоты продукта компании META, запрещённой в РФ #artistonduty
❤20
наш с вами ‘старый знакомый’ Жоэль Бланк переместился с грунтовых кортов в Grand Palais и теперь делает зарисовки кутюрного chanel когда отточил мастерство на теннисных скоростях и теперь ‘на чиле’ рисуешь модных принцесс! идеально! #offdutyinspo
❤11
сегодня начался Уимблдон - самый красивый, на мой взгляд, турнир Большого Шлема 🎾🎾 по этому знаменательному поводу пересматриваем одноименный фильм с юной Кирстен Данст и Полом Беттани кстати, сценарий вдохновлен реальной историей - в 2001 году хорватский теннисист Горан Иванишевич на закате карьеры, не имея казалось бы никаких перспектив, прошел в основную сетку Уимблдона через квалификацию и выиграл турнир! была…
❤8
найдите 10 отличий хаха на самом деле, это оказалось не так просто, особенно на неустойчивой опоре, но у нас есть хороший пример, будем стремиться к концу лета повторить точь-в-точь🧘♀️ #такоенастроение
❤14
художница, модница и обладательница одной из самых внушительных коллекций prada Дженни Уолтон выпустила книгу о своем стиле, которую сама же и проиллюстрировала выглядит как мечта план #offdityinspo
❤16
коллеги-художники, неожиданно в ночи захотелось обсудить профессиональный вопрос 🎈 подруга прислала видео какого-то восточного модного интернет-издания с процессом создания live-скетчей на показе PFW - я сделала несколько скринов, тут видно, что художник делает ‘обводилки’ по фоточкам вообще-то как будто бы этот способ всегда порицался в профессиональном сообществе (но каждый им когда-то баловался, что уж там) а в…
❤7
рубрика ‘срочно надо’, кажется, у нас тут самая постоянная подвеска на сумку bottega veneta для самых модных художниц #offdutywish
❤10
на мастер-классе по росписи матрешек сделала себе немного ‘марджелы’ 🐾 хаха #artistonduty
❤13
when tennis meets art 🎾🎾 это не ai, а вполне реальный корт в Валенсии, созданный художником MRKA сыграли бы на таком? #offdityinspo
❤8
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @sharapovaaaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“artist off duty” (@sharapovaaaaa), 500 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharapovaaaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.