Channel
@Sejchas_pokazhu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
144subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002020515506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sejchas_pokazhu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sejchas_pokazhu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 144 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 145 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 147 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 147 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 34.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 22.2% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 12.5% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я шла купить только этот «скошенный» галстук и заодно посмотреть на те самые трендовые очки Celine. Их, к сожалению, не было, зато был этот клатч 😎 Продавец убедил меня, что он есть в наличии только в Лондоне, Париже и Милане, а я и поверила. Ни о чем не жалею, к слову.
🔥5
Это, к слову, была зарисовка на тему Dior. Уже писала, что я люблю работать с разными милыми существами через движение и передачу характера. Пока я крашу свои видео, второй месяц мне выносит голову один ювелирный бренд. Мне пишут одинаковые сообщения разные менеджеры этой компании, не отвечают на мои встречные вопросы. Потом пропадают, а спустя время снова появляются с теми же вопросами, присылают референсы, которые…
❤7🤯3
Как я была рада увидеть его там, делающего быстрый скетч показа. Fashion-иллюстрация возвращается в таком виде, в каком она должна быть!
❤13❤🔥7
Мне понадобилось довольно много времени, чтобы понять, что они мне точно нужны.
❤🔥7💯2
Стайлинг Шарлотт Коллет для Aurallee 🍌 Даже захотелось себе сплести такие бананы на ногу.
🔥6❤2😍1
Прекрасная иллюстрация художницы Maggie Cowles для статьи в Vogue, посвященную этикету поведения и дресс-коду на баскетбольных матчах команды New York Knicks. artist off duty тоже чувствует современный вайб спортивно-фэшн иллюстрации на все сто процентов в своем канале. Классно, когда моду можно показать не только через статичные образы с показов.
🔥5❤2❤🔥2
Все пишут, что Sotheby’s выставят на торги эскизы Лагерфельда, но там есть и другое культовое Например, айподы дизайнера или его перчатки. В июле узнаем, по каким астрономическим ценникам все это добро улетит
😁9❤1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Sejchas_pokazhu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CHER” (@Sejchas_pokazhu), 144 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sejchas_pokazhu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.