Channel
@shangin_an
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
154subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001657909455 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shangin_an |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shangin_an |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 154 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:29 | 156 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 157 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:20 | 157 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 2 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 31.6% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 15.8% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 13.2% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 1 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера тусил ))) Еще в том году нашел случайно в интернетах девицу красавицу - мою коллегу по походам между городами )) Василина дошла до Питера из Мск 😱, прошла 100км за сутки пешком для личного рекорда, занимается скалолазанием Короче, увидел, стало интересно, подписался 👉 @VasillinaBlack ❤️ Пару недель назад она выставила пост про "го кататься в картинг", ну я вписался, прошел отбор, и вчера мы катали в Тимотивс…
❤4🔥4⚡2😎1
Photo, posted without a caption
🥱1
Было время
Клещи бомжи медведи и никаких подгузников 🤣
😁2
А чем ты занимаешься в 4:16 ночи?
😁3🔥2
В своей жизни я отдаю приоритет своим творческим порывам. Это как-то изнутри подпитывает мою мотивацию, и поддерживает уровень эндорфинов в крови. Даже если я ухожу в нули по другим сферам, творческие результаты это все перекрывают. Удивительным образом все остальные задачи закрываются часто автоматически, когда делаешь то что хочешь (занимаешься творчеством). Думаю многие ощущают себя несчастными, потому что как р…
🔥4
Моя проблема в том, что я слишком много всего умею, и вместо того, чтобы что-то делегировать - мне проще этому самому научиться и сделать
😁3🤬1
Делаю что-то вроде электронного портфеля. приложения немного похожего по логике на дуолинго, только чтобы можно было самостоятельно себе курс по интересной теме и проходить его в своем темпе
Я тут подумал. Мало кто наверное в курсе, но короче у меня меня есть высшее образование. И я в какой-то момент - да ну его нах, пойду бизнес делать. А образование крутого вуза НГУ. Ну в общем я тут уже больше года наверное делаю шаги в сторону того, чтобы как-то вернуться в колею науки, научных изысканий… Вроде того, что я хочу сделать какой-нибудь стартап. Может быть мне рассказывать вам тут про это?
👍5❤1🔥1🤡1😁1
Задавайте себе правильные вопросы
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @shangin_an. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Антон Ш.” (@shangin_an), 154 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shangin_an.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.