Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Al Maktabah Ash Shafi'iyyah

Channel

Al Maktabah Ash Shafi'iyyah

@shafiifiqh2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002178963917
TypeChannel
Username@shafiifiqh2
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 15 July 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shafiifiqh2

Growth

178179178.526 August 2026 — 178 subscribers26 August 2026 — 178 subscribers2 September 2026 — 179 subscribers12 September 2026 — 178 subscribers26 August 202612 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 178–179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 00:18178-1
2 Sept 2026, 15:34179+1
26 Aug 2026, 19:30178no change
26 Aug 2026, 19:15178first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 39s
Average length
1m 20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3378.6%
👍921.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2024 to 27 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2024, 00:10 UTC826 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahl_AtharPhoto

The "Tafqih Al-Muhaddith wa Tanbih Al-Faqih" program is pleased to invite you to attend the Matn Al-Ghayah wal-Taqreeb lessons with Sheikh Saeed Al-Jabri. Textbook: Matn Al-Ghayah wal-Taqreeb by Imam Abu Shuja’ (Mukhtasar Abi Shuja'/Matn Abi Shuja') Date: Every Monday starting from 30th September 2024 1:00 PM Mecca Time 6:00 PM Malaysia Time Venue: Via Zoom Fees: RM120, covering both "Al-Ghayah wal-Taqreeb" and a

👍1

9 Sept 2024, 05:17 UTC646 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Is Wudu valid with fake eyelashes? Shaykh Labib Najib https://youtu.be/tjeAOHfZWdg?si=KC6ExgFmMRp4200e

1

5 Sept 2024, 03:55 UTC620 viewsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahl_AtharPhoto

The Tafqih Al-Muhaddis Wa Tanbih Al-Faqih Program is pleased to invite you to attend the *Safinat Al-Naja* classes with Fadhilat Al-Sheikh Sa'id Al-Jabiri. Book: Safinat Al-Naja by Sheikh Salim Al-Hadhrami Location: Via Zoom Schedule: Every Monday starting from June 10, 2024 1:00 PM Mecca Time / 6:00 PM Malaysia Time Special Note: Participants who pass the exam and commit to paying the fees will receive a sanad (

5 Sept 2024, 03:55 UTC429 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahl_AtharPhoto

Tafqih Al-Muhaddis Wa Tanbih Al-Faqih Program We invite you to join our Hadith of Legal Rulings class through the study of the book Umdah Al-Ahkam. Instructor: Fadhilat Al-Sheikh Sa'id Al-Jabiri Text: Umdah Al-Ahkam by Imam Abdul Ghani Al-Maqdisi Schedule: Every Sunday evening, starting from June 23, 2024, at 6:00 PM Malaysia Time Location: Zoom Fee: RM 120 This fee also covers the Fiqh class held every Monday

👍1

5 Sept 2024, 00:18 UTC333 viewsread 26 August 2026
Voice message

Question 855: are there any good explanation for bulugh al maram in Arabic that is good for a Shafi’i student?

5 Sept 2024, 00:18 UTC346 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

فقه بلوغ المرام #محمد_الزحيلي #فقه_عام #حديث

1

4 Sept 2024, 00:47 UTC332 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahl_Athar

Abu Bakr Al-Ajurri Ash-Shafi’i [d.360H] (رحمه الله) said: قال الإمام أبو بكر الآجري الشافعي : أغْرب الغُرباء في وقتنا هذا مَن أخذ بِالسُّنن وصبر عليها، وحذر البِّدع وصبر عنها، واتّبع آثار مَن سلف من أئمة المُسلمين، وعرف زمانهُ وشدّة فساده. The strangest of strangers in our time is the one who adheres to the Sunnah and remains patient upon it, avoids innovations and refrains from them, follows the Athar of the Salaf

5

2 Sept 2024, 07:40 UTC323 views3 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahl_AtharPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👍3

31 Aug 2024, 23:40 UTC350 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026

What is Usul Al Fiqh - Ustadh Dawud Burke https://youtu.be/b3uPKn-tAP0?si=SKB-AkcFbrOE10pS

5

7 Aug 2024, 15:16 UTC385 views4 reactionsread 26 August 2026

I am taking on some students for Quran classes (hifdh or Ijazah) 3 lessons a week if you're interested message me @aal_moalim is my username

4

5 Aug 2024, 04:13 UTC447 viewsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @sukkuuunPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

5 Aug 2024, 04:13 UTC432 views3 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @sukkuuun

For the brothers and sisters in the UK ^

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @shafiifiqh2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MBBS Freaks🥶🥶
@mbbsfreaks2606 · 28,678
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 9 September 2026
Marrow Notes
@Marrow_Edition9Notes · 124,930
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Al Maktabah Ash Shafi'iyyah” (@shafiifiqh2), 178 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shafiifiqh2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.