Диджитал-медиа, где АI-маскот и редакция делятся высокоранговыми трендами и поясняют за стиль и свагу.
Сотрудничество: @whoisdonny
РКН — https://rkn.link/jt7
Работаем с @Spiral_Yuri и Perfluence
Created
Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +1,631. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,217,846–1,248,225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:04
1,244,720
+23,369
11 Aug 2026, 15:44
1,221,351
-6,650
10 Aug 2026, 12:31
1,228,001
-8,038
9 Aug 2026, 10:52
1,236,039
-6,702
8 Aug 2026, 08:23
1,242,741
-348
7 Aug 2026, 19:45
1,243,089
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:35
1,243,089
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.82%
avg views ÷ 1,244,720 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,700
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
41 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
930,000
Reactions total
2,790
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 00:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,250
Videos
≈476
Links
≈49
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 08s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 35 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 27of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.7 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 28.2% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 70.3% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 16,900 views — 1.36% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 32,350).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
2.3 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
2,790 reactions across 41 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,774
63.6%
🤣
279
10.0%
🔥
220
7.89%
💔
99
3.55%
😁
92
3.30%
🌚
90
3.23%
💯
57
2.04%
🤯
51
1.83%
👍
50
1.79%
👀
47
1.68%
😭
22
0.789%
🙏
9
0.323%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,790reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.44%
1 of 41 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
19,700
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
21,100
over 40 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5xBtrUA
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
У ahahah есть фарфоровые кружки с ручками в виде массивных колец — вместо настоящих камней здесь цветная глазурь, а блеск металла получают за счет росписи с использованием платины. Каждое изделие расписывают вручную, поэтому рисунок и сочетание оттенков получаются уникальными.
Коллекцию вдохновили ювелирные детали и натюрморты Виллема Класа Хеды, которые создатели бренда увидели в Эрмитаже.
Высокоранговое чаепитие …
Банку Arizona Green Tea превратили в СУМКУ — рукодельница iceicekittyy закастомила популярную jelly фиркин.
Такая идея пришла не случайно: изначально оттенок в модели почти не отличается от оригинального бирюзовой упаковки напитка.
Дизайнер добавила ветки сакуры и надписи Green Tea with Ginseng and Honey. Весь рисунок нанесён вручную, а сама сумка существует в единственном экземпляре.
Ставим 10 Аризон из 10 😎
Аудитория Telegram за год сократилась на 17%, а средний объем рекламы вырос в 2026 на 2% — такую парадоксальную картину получили CloudBuying, изучившие рынок рекламы мессенджера с января 2025-го по июнь 2026-го.
По их исследованию, каждый восьмой-девятый рекламный пост связан с банками: на них приходится 12–14% всех публикаций, а 86% упоминаний забирают Сбер, ВТБ, Т-Банк, Альфа-Банк и Совкомбанк.
Но есть нюанс: бол…
Мейкер Kiara создала робо-пса из Джимми Нейтрона— теперь Годдард существует в реальности: автор собрала полноразмерную копию-аниматроник из мультсериала.
За основу она взяла 3D-модель персонажа из старой игры для Nintendo GameCube, доработала её и распечатала корпус на 3D-принтере.
Внутри пса установлено куча железа, которое позволяет быть ему «живым»: ноги двигают линейные актуаторы, голову сервоприводы и система …
Маэстро мебельных концептов muddycap показал идею скамейки в виде карандашей — основание сделано из классических желтых карандашей с розовым ластиком, а спинка из деревянной стружки, которая отстается от точилки. Таким приёмом дизайнер как бы замыкает форму объекта саму на себя.
Muddycap регулярно придумывает новые идеи, и хотелось бы, чтобы их кто-то начал воплощать. Такие идеально смотрелись бы в школах, вузах и к…
🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋
Свежие идеи заслуживают яркого старта, а всю рутину Т-Бизнес возьмет на себя — от регистрации ИП до бухгалтерии и электронной подписи.
Открыть ИП можно онлайн за 0 ₽, без поездок в налоговую и бумажной волокиты. На каждом этапе помогут специалисты, а поддержка работает 24/7. А ещё вы получите:
😀 2 месяца бесплатного обслуживания счёта;
😀 онлайн-бухгалтерию за 0 ₽;
😀 бесплатный выпуск и доставка электронной…
Парящий ужин — скульптура художника Тони Мателли: в новой работе Sideways Dinner тарелки, бутылки и бокалы выстроены в вертикальную конструкцию, хотя визуально каждый предмет кажется отдельным.
Мателли вообще любит обманывать глаз: для работы художник использовал расписную бронзу, сталь, полиуретан и эпоксидную смолу. Даже остатки еды здесь скульптура.
Художник-иллюзионист, получается 😏
У Seletti есть целая коллекция с мемными питомцами — можно найти косметички, подушки, коврики и даже стулья со смешными собаками и кошками.
Дизайнер серии с ироничным ником Toiletpaper разработал эту серию для создания самых нескучных интерьеров.
Мой фаворит взъерошенный кот 😁
Колонка, чтобы дэнсить «в ритме колбасы» — креативная студия verlab выкатила концепт умной колонки, которая идеально подойдет в любой кухонный интерьер.
Девайс сделали в форме высокого цилиндра со скошенным краем, а также узнаваемым колбасным принтом.
Веганам предлагают рассмотреть версию из сои 😏
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @trendtrendtrend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Трендли” (@trendtrendtrend), 1,244,720 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trendtrendtrend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
