3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 217–218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 14:39
217
-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:35
218
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:05
218
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 217 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
20 (26 December 2025 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
25
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23m 24s
Average length
7m 48s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅کتاب جادوی سیاه
کتابی در رد باورهای مشرکان عصر معاصر (وهابیت)
بالغ بر 400 صفحه ( ویژه محققین)
(اگر این کتاب به دست ملحدان واتئیست ها برسد، تمام وهابیت و همفکران آنان را به راحتی شکست خواهند داد)
در این کتاب به صورت اختصار اصل و اساس دین وهابیت یعنی مشرکان عصر معاصر مطرح و با دقت تمام به چالش کشیده شده است. و یک محقق می تواند با این سر نخ ها ، مباحث تحقیقی خود را تکمیل نماید .
❌قطعا هرکس این کتاب را با دقت بخوا…
🛑 پارت دوم مناظره 🛑
آیا #خداوند از تمام #صحابه #راضی است؟
آیا تشخیص #صحابه_منافق از صحابه_مومن ممکن است؟
تعریف #قرآن_کریم از صحابه چیست؟
آیا رضایت خدا شامل صحابه مؤمن و صحابه منافق است؟
افسانه_رضایت_ابدی_خداوند_از_صحابه از سوی چه کسانی و با چه هدفی طراحی شده است؟
آیا تعریفی برای صحابه در قرآن وجود دارد؟
https://t.me/seraatoali
🛑 پارت اول مناظره 🛑
آیا #خداوند از تمام #صحابه #راضی است؟
آیا تشخیص #صحابه_منافق از صحابه_مومن ممکن است؟
تعریف #قرآن_کریم از صحابه چیست؟
آیا رضایت خدا شامل صحابه مؤمن و صحابه منافق است؟
افسانه_رضایت_ابدی_خداوند_از_صحابه از سوی چه کسانی و با چه هدفی طراحی شده است؟
https://t.me/seraatoali
ادعای اینکه علت شهادت امام جواد علیهالسلام «تجدیدفراش» بوده، دروغی بیسند است و سعی در ایجاد شایعهای ناشیانه است
تمام منابع متفقاند که ایشان :
با سم
بدستور معتصم عباسی
و بدست امالفضل دختر مأمون به شهادت رسید
🔹شیخ مفید: «… تُوُفِّيَ … بِبَغْدَادَ مَسْمُومًا»
📘الارشاد،ج۲،ص۲۹۵
🔹اربلی: «… أُمَّ الْفَضْلِ سَقَتْهُ السُّمَّ بِإِشَارَةِ الْمُعْتَصِم»
📘کشفالغمه،ج۲،ص۳۴۹
🔹مسعودیِ سنی: «… وَ قِيلَ سُمِّمَ»
📘مروجالذهب،ج۴…
در مسند احمد ابن حنبل به سند صحیح به تصریح آمده است که مولا علی (علیهالسلام) در اتفاقات و فتنههای بعد از شهادت پیامبر اکرم (صلیاللهعلیهواله) از سوی ایشان توصیه و مأمور به صبر و تحمل بودند.
این سند و اسناد مشابه از منابع جماعت موسوم به اهل سنت دلایل صبر و تحمل آن حضرت (مولا علی علیهالسلام) را به تصریح بیان میکند.
۴ پاسخ مهم به شبهه «چرا مولا علی(علیهالسلام) با مهاجمان نجنگید؟
۱. مولا علی(علیهالسلام) مأمور به صبر بود، نه مأمور به شمشیر.
متن عربی :
«إِنْ وَجَدْتَ أَعْوَانًا فَجَاهِدْهُمْ، وَإِلَّا فَاصْبِرْ وَاكْفُفْ يَدَكَ»
ترجمه:
«اگر یاور داشتی بجنگ، و اگر نه، صبر کن و دست نگه دار.»
📚 الارشاد، شیخ مفید، ج۱، ص۱۸۴
📚 شرح نهجالبلاغه، ابنابیالحدید، ج۶، ص۴۷
🔹 نتیجه: مخالفت با دستور پیامبر، شجاعت نیست؛ نافرمانی است.
۲. جنگ …
سندی دیگر بر پشیمانی ابوبکر از هجوم به بیت حضرت زهرا (سلاماللهعلیها) :
حدثني هدية بن خالد ، ثنا حماد بن سلمة، ثنا حميد عن أنس أن الهرمزان رأى عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله تعالى عنه مضطجعاً في مسجد رسول الله ﷺ ليس حوله أحد فقال هذا والله آخر الملك الهنيء. حدثني حفص بن عمر ، ثنا الهيثم بن عدي عن يونس بن يزيد الأيلي عن الزهري أن عبد الرحمن بن عوف قال : دخلت على أبي بكر في مرضه فقال: قد اجتمع علي مع مرضي مرض آخر، يا معشر ال…
شمس الدین ذهبی رجالی، حدیث شناس و تاریخ نگار معروف جماعت موسوم به اهل سنت پس از نقل روایت پشیمانی ابوبکر از طریق علوان بن داود راوی مورد بحث مینویسد :
اینچنین روایت کرده است و طولانیتر از این از ابن وهب (ت ۱۹۷ هـ الإِمَامُ، شَيْخُ الإِسْلامِ، الحافظ. سیر اعلام النبلاء، جلد ۹ صفحه ۲۳۳ از لیث بن سعد، از صالح بن کیسان است. اینچنین ابن عائذ روایت کرده است.
پ.ن ۱- این روایت لیث از صالح بن کیسان بدون واسطهی علوان" را ذ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seraatoali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صراط علی علیهالسلام” (@seraatoali), 217 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seraatoali.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.