Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SEO inside

Channel

SEO inside

@seo_inside

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,836subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001348571238
TypeChannel
Username@seo_inside
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/seo_inside

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,8103,8423,8266 August 2026 — 3,810 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,810 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,816 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,819 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,818 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,827 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,835 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,837 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,842 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,841 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,822 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,824 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,822 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,825 subscribers25 September 2026 — 3,836 subscribers3,8366 August 202625 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 51 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,805–3,847 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 20:013,836+11
15 Sept 2026, 16:583,825+3
11 Sept 2026, 15:573,822-2
7 Sept 2026, 00:023,824+2
2 Sept 2026, 04:353,822-19
30 Aug 2026, 00:283,841-1
27 Aug 2026, 04:563,842+5
24 Aug 2026, 14:373,837+2
21 Aug 2026, 03:443,835+8
18 Aug 2026, 09:523,827+9
15 Aug 2026, 04:073,818-1
11 Aug 2026, 20:423,819+3
9 Aug 2026, 05:503,816+6
6 Aug 2026, 04:313,810no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:323,810first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7544.4%
🔥5130.2%
❤2213.0%
👎2112.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC520 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Оновлення в INSERT.LINK: Backlink API + MCP для автоматизації. В INSERT.LINK з’явилися безкоштовні інструменти для роботи з беклінками, серед яких є рішення, аналогів яким наразі практично немає на ринку. 👇🏻 Наприклад: • Anchor Text Lookup — допомагає знаходити сайти за конкретними анкорами • Backlink Lookup — показує беклінки конкурентів на основі власної бази INSERT.LINK Також доступні Domain Lookup, Backlink…

🔥6👎2👍1

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

30 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,050 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У кого був такий досвід роботи з Клодом, коли він "іде у відмову" :)

👍7

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

29 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,110 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Як я формулюю промти для Opus 5, щоб отримувати правду LLM за своєю природою (як авторегресійні мовні моделі) навчені генерувати текст до кінця. Якщо в промті є завдання "зроби висновок", модель оптимізує ймовірність тексту так, щоб цей висновок був. Навіть якщо даних немає. Кілька прийомів, які реально змінюють якість відповіді. Я явно даю моделі право сказати, що даних недостатньо, і прошу окремим блоком перелічи…

🔥12👍4

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

26 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,260 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Для тих, хто міг пропустити. Вчора опублікував статтю про нову модель Claude Opus 5 https://pro100blogger.com/2026/07/anthropic-vypuskaye-claude-opus-5-intelekt-rivnya-fable-za-menshu-czinu.html А саме про те як доцільно її використовувати для SEO і у яких випадках варто НЕ використовувати. Хочу сказати, що цікавість до моделі настільки велика, що сьогодні зайшовши у додаток Claude я побачив, що їх сервер цієї моделі…

👍6🔥3

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

23 Jul 2026, 05:16 UTC≈1,440 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Посібник для спільноти. "Розуміння міграції доменів Google: довгострокова реальність переміщення сайтів". Підготовлено продуктовими експертами. Мова - англійська. Посилання https://support.google.com/webmasters/community-guide/453577806

❤4

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

17 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,790 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Щось давно ми про інструменти не писали. Особливо я люблю безкоштовні. Collaborator спільно з SE Ranking презентує новий інструмент — безкоштовний Backlink Checker. З ним аналіз посилального профілю займає лише кілька хвилин 👉 https://collaborator.pro/ua/free-backlink-checker/

👍8🔥3👎2❤1

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

3 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC≈2,140 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Можливо хтось ще не чув про вихід GPT-5.6. Компанія OpenAI перейшла до стратегії швидких ітерацій і представила серію моделей GPT-5.6 для конкуренції з рішеннями від Anthropic. Чекаю, на доступ, бо Claude Fable 5 беде з 7 числа тільки через API. https://pro100blogger.com/2026/07/openai-predstavyla-simejstvo-modelej-gpt-5-6.html

👍2

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

27 Jun 2026, 03:20 UTC≈2,070 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://status.search.google.com/incidents/YUX1peHev5a4fkxLDiUQ ну що, спам апдейт закінчився . Ви помітили які вони стали короткі? Я помітив зміни ще з 19 числа, тобто до початку. Мабуть вони тиждень тестували до початку.

👍3

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

24 Jun 2026, 16:46 UTC≈2,010 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

З 19 числа шось тестували і ось Today we released the June 2026 spam update. We'll update our ranking release history page when the rollout is complete.

👎11❤2

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

24 Jun 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,160 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Трохи про фейкових авторів. Новітня антиспам система на рівні архітектури в числі інших ознак враховує ідентифікацію пристрою з якого зроблена публікація. Якщо з одного пристрою пишуть "10 журналістів", то вони будуть вважатися одним кластером і якщо якість контенту - "гів..но", увесь кластер блокується.

👍10

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

9 Jun 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,470 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

API-інтерфейс Ahrefs для оцінки авторитетності домену (DR) тепер доступний абсолютно БЕЗКОШТОВНО. Зараз, коли штучний інтелект дозволяє кожному створювати власні інструменти та автоматизовані процеси, головним обмежувальним фактором вже не є програмування, а доступ до якісних даних. А показник DR — це один із найкращих способів швидко оцінити, наскільки авторитетним є веб-сайт. Тому ми Ahrefs просто надаємо його б…

🔥7❤3👍3

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

8 Jun 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,710 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

RankEmbed працює як один із багатьох сигналів у складній багаторівневій системі ранжування Google. Він не замінює традиційний пошук за ключовими словами, а доповнює його, допомагаючи системі краще розуміти семантичну близькість. https://pro100blogger.com/2026/06/yak-praczyuye-algorytm-rankembed-vid-google-povnyj-rozbir-semantychnogo-poshuku.html

👍2❤1

Signed Viacheslav Varenia

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seo_inside. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Артем Бородатюк
@artemborodatiuk · 26,272
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
GENIUS.SPACE
@genius_space · 353,947
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEO inside” (@seo_inside), 3,836 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seo_inside.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.