Channel
@selfwardrobe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
139subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001626462859 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @selfwardrobe |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/selfwardrobe |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 139 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 140 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 141 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 141 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
45 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 71.1% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 17.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2024 to 11 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Поэтому я приняла непростое для меня решение. *Выдыхаю, разрешаю себе тут быть нерегулярной и посмотреть что из этого получится* Если хочется более частых "встреч", то приглашаю вас "переехать" на мой старый канал — Тревожный психолог. (Больше каналов 😂) Это рефлексивный дневник психолога и тревожного человека. ⭐️ А записаться на психологическую сессию можно через личку @openwardrobe
❤6❤🔥2🦄2🔥1
В Ы Г О Р А Н И Е 😔 С ним я столкнулась, когда решила тут постить каждый день. И до сих пор не оправилась( Когда мои ожидания не оправдались: от сил, которые я тратила, от откликов и результата. И паралельно я делала то, что мне нравилось больше - развивала супервизорскую практику. Важно и честно будет остановиться с ежедневным постингом и признать, что мне важна обратная связь и новые клиенты) (да ладно! Наконец …
❤8🔥3
•хороший вопрос• Какая поддержка в работе тебе сейчас нужна?
"Я хочу вопросов в Самопознании..."
The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
(Белла) Привет) В Самопознании закончился месяц отношений и пока возвращается разнообразие. Но я тут засомневалась в формате ежедневного постинга коротких вопросов и заметочек 🤔. Вижу, что это утомляет, теряется интерес. У меня всё ещё кучи вопросов, которые я готова задавать вам тут или на сессиях, но я могу выкладывать их реже пачками, разбавлять текстами. ❤️🩹 Нужна помощь в решении) Не хочу чтобы эта вся "класс…
❤3
(Белла) Должок за мной 😉 Сделала для вас карточки про психологические практики для друзей. Можно делать вдвоем или в компании. А заодно и на пару вопросов ответить из прошедшего #месяц_отношений Пробуйте, делитесь в комментариях как вы провели время) Буду рада вашей поддержке ❤️ и вопросам, если что-то непонятно!
❤4👍1
•хороший вопрос• Важна ли для тебя свобода? Как ты её ощущаешь в отношениях? #месяц_отношений
❤3
•хороший вопрос• Что происходит с твоими дружескими связями, когда у тебя есть партнёр? #месяц_отношений
❤3🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2
Продолжение рассказа психолога про работу с отношениями на психологических сессиях. О сложности, с которой многие сталкиваются принося такие запросы 👇
А что думаешь про вопросы?)
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Привет 🫶 Месяц про отношения скоро завершится. И мне важно ваше мнение про него. Буду благодарна за ответы в опросниках, это помогает мне делать канал полезным для вас ❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @selfwardrobe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
"Я хочу вопросов в Самопознании..."
The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А что думаешь про вопросы?)
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как тебе был тематический месяц про отношения "Я и другие"?)
The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Получается ли у тебя дружить с человеком, если вы имеете разные взгляды на несколько вещей?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2024 to 11 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Самопознание без обязательств” (@selfwardrobe), 139 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/selfwardrobe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.