Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дескуфизация Вадима

Channel

Дескуфизация Вадима

@scoofmarafon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

183subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002379879707
TypeChannel
Username@scoofmarafon
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scoofmarafon

Growth

1811831826 August 2026 — 181 subscribers7 August 2026 — 181 subscribers13 August 2026 — 183 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 181–183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:45183+2
7 Aug 2026, 08:17181no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:48181first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
67.2%
avg views ÷ 183 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held12 (18 June 202622 July 2026)
Views total123
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁7238.5%
2915.5%
🔥2211.8%
💔168.56%
🤝147.49%
💯126.42%
😭73.74%
❤‍🔥42.14%
👏21.07%
🤣21.07%
🥰21.07%
10.535%
👌10.535%
👎10.535%
💊10.535%
🤔10.535%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC123 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что с этим делать? Кто-то уже находил лекарство от этих митохондриев? Они передаются половым путем? Судя по всему, жить мне осталось лет 60.

💔3😭2🤔1😁1

16 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC219 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Это было год назад, а как будто вчера

🔥10❤‍🔥4😁4

13 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC172 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zavtrazapustimPhoto

Еще недавно режиму был конец, но его спасли. Рассказываю, кому и как это удалось. Пока за мной не выехали, поспешу уточнить — я про свой режим питания и сна. Если коротко: я несколько лет жил как бессмертный: ел, что хотел и когда хотел. Иной раз я мог на ночь прикончить банку сгущенки, запивая ее кофе, а потом шлифануть чипсами с безалкогольным пивом, лечь в 4 утра, встать в 9 и пойти делать дела. Это просто один

12😁7🔥4👏2

7 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC256 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рецепт раннего идеального сна неожиданно найден. Оказывается, все было просто. Нужно было просто прекратить перед сном спорить с кем-то в международной сети "Интернет". Забирайте, делитесь лайфхаком.

😁16💯5🔥5👌1💊1

6 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC276 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нужен ваш совет Короче, я сделал о себе хорошее глубокое исследование по особенностям организма с учётом ДНК теста, анализов крови, гормонов и режима тренировок У меня к вам два вопроса: 01. Порекомендуйте какие-нибудь полезные перекусы, которые вы используете, чтобы лишний раз сахар не вызывать, а еще чтобы это было вкусно и не сложно готовилось или где купить 02. Обычно я ложусь примерно в 2 – 3 ночи. Мне нужно

🔥32🤝2

1 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC278 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Были в Рускеале, больше не поеду. Короче, если коротко — локация пушка, но я остался с неприятным осадком от организатора. Заплыв — хуй пойми какая траектория. Пловцы путались, где поворот на второй круг, часть нарезала лишнего, часть — жестко срезала. Спрашиваю сапера — внятно ответить не может. Я не могу насладиться своим 13м местом в абсолюте, потому что даже не знаю, как много ребят ниже по рейтингу наплыли лиш

🤝1210😁91

27 Jun 2026, 12:26 UTC261 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На рускеале заплывы не хватает Быковского. Организатор все сделал очень по-долбоебски Буй уполз, круг невнятный

😁6👎1

23 Jun 2026, 17:57 UTC320 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вспомнил, почему бегать начал

😁123💯2

20 Jun 2026, 12:38 UTC342 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Короче, я заболел и просрал 2 старта на открытой воде в Истре на общую сумму 15к. И это спасибо, что на эстафете мне нашли замену, иначе бы я влетел еще на 8к ребятам, которые оплатили свою часть. Я пытался вылечиться за 2 дня, но заболел так заболел. Через неделю мы едем 1000км до рускеалы. Надо подлечиться, чтобы не просрать еще один старт. Обидно дико. Это уже второй сход с дистанции за год — зимой я сошел со

💔13😭52😁2

18 Jun 2026, 14:54 UTC218 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему всякие соушлраны, коферайды и прочие кофе-соушл активности есть, а соушлсвимов нету? Ваши варианты в комменты.

😁4

18 Jun 2026, 14:54 UTC231 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я это к чему. Зашел тут в скуратов за кофе и булкой с шоколадом и охуел от количества соушлраннеров, обсуждающих свои ссаные 5 км бега. Да, я ушел, конечно, с колоссальным чувством превосходства, практически ощутил то, что чувствует мой кот каждое мгновение своей жизни, но вот снова задумался на тему спортивного кучкования.

😁4🤣2💯1

18 Jun 2026, 07:59 UTC227 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Короче, что я понял о беговой стилистике за 2 недели погружения. Если у тебя простенький недорогой бренд demix, который делает хорошие вещи — твоя задача спрятать логотип и не показывать его на изделии, тогда тебя будут покупать. Если ты делаешь фирмовую экипировку типа adidas, твоя задача сделать минимально нужное качество и разместить логотип как можно крупнее, тогда тебя будут покупать. Если ты делаешь русский

😁7💯4🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @scoofmarafon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,435 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дескуфизация Вадима” (@scoofmarafon), 183 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scoofmarafon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.