9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,481–13,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 05:24
13,576
+1
12 Aug 2026, 03:18
13,575
-23
11 Aug 2026, 01:11
13,598
+30
10 Aug 2026, 02:32
13,568
+51
9 Aug 2026, 03:54
13,517
+17
8 Aug 2026, 07:11
13,500
+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:54
13,499
+3
6 Aug 2026, 02:31
13,496
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:22
13,496
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 13,576 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
31 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
53,603
Reactions total
1,562
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,562 reactions across 31 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
685
43.9%
🔥
480
30.7%
😍
140
8.96%
custom 5321533130501297228
127
8.13%
👍
86
5.51%
🏆
19
1.22%
💔
10
0.64%
⚡
9
0.576%
😁
6
0.384%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,562reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 31 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sbmrne. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мифы о кофейных фермерах, в которые верят⬇️
1️⃣ Все фермеры бедные
Это, пожалуй, один из самых устойчивых стереотипов. Кофейные фермы бывают очень разными: от небольших семейных хозяйств до крупных современных производств. У фермеров может быть разный масштаб бизнеса, оборудование, команда и уровень дохода.
Как сказал наш руководитель Роман Хомченко: "Еще ни разу я не видел фермера беднее меня" 🤪
2️⃣ Фермеры живу…
🤫 Как мы придумали подписку на кофе в дрипах?
Смотрите в видео или читайте ниже👇
Когда подписки на кофе только становились популярными, почти все они были про кофе в зёрнах.
А мы заметили, что все больше людей интересуются кофе в дрипах.
И мы подумали: а почему бы не сделать подписку и для тех, кто любит такой формат?
Так появилась наша дрип-подписка.
Но нам хотелось сделать из ее распаковки маленький нескучный…
💭 Мы к вам с напоминанием — конкурс дизайна для МЕГА-дрипов продолжается!
Так что если вы ждали знак — вот он 👀
Что нужно делать⬇️
📎Скачать мокапы
📎Создать свой дизайн упаковки
📎Отправить всё нам через гугл-форму
Успейте загрузить свою работу до 7 сентября 2026 года
Призы:
1⃣место — годовая подписка на кофе
2⃣место — подписка на 6 месяцев
3⃣место — подписка на 3 месяца
4⃣и 5⃣места — подписка на 1 месяц
Мы выбер…
Один СМОЛ и несколько способов заваривания
СМОЛ — это свежеСМОЛотый кофе в порционных саше по 30г или 60г. Мы отмерили нужное количество и упаковали кофе в азотированной среде, чтобы он дольше сохранял насыщенный вкус.
А дальше вы выбираете сами, как его заварить! 👇
🔵Пуровер
Для тех, кто любит чистую чашку
Засыпаете СМОЛ в воронку, проливаете несколько раз водой и получаете классический фильтр
🔵Френч-пресс
Для…
Уже 29 августа встречаемся на квартирнике ☕️
Начинаем понемногу раскрывать, что вас ждёт
Что уже можно записать в планы:
🎯 Кофейное бинго
Проверим, сможете ли вы разгадать наши кофейные загадки и правильно ответить на вопросы
🌱 Сажаем кофейные деревья
Да, прямо на квартирнике можно будет посадить своё кофейное дерево и забрать его домой
🎨 Кастомизация дрипов
Вы сможете дать волю фантазии, придумать свой дизайн дл…
Собрали все самое важное за неделю в воскресный дайджест👇
👍 Запустили конкурс на дизайн МЕГА-дрипов
☕️Кофе со скидкой 20%
🤔Рассказали, почему кофе дорожает во всем мире
🤝 Уже 29 августа встречаемся с вами на квартирнике
😃 Новые наклейки на упаковки
🍬 Какао снова доступен к заказу на сайте
☀️Рецепт какао-тоника на жаркие дни лета
👀 Акция на сайте, в которой вы еще успеваете поучаствовать
🤩 Новинки этой недели…
Один и тот же кофе под эспрессо и под фильтр — в чем разница?
Часто один и тот же лот появляется у нас сразу в двух версиях: в белой и в черной пачках. У них разные профили обжарки: под эспрессо и под фильтр 😃 😀
Но зачем?
Потому что в разных методах приготовления по-разному экстрагируется кофе
🔵Эспрессо готовится быстро и под высоким давлением, поэтому и зерно обжаривается немного темнее. Так кофе легче экстраги…
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На этих выходных предлагаем вам выбрать лоты, которые будут на следующей неделе со скидкой 20% в интернет-магазине
Голосуйте ниже👇🏼
❤19👍5🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @sbmrne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 21,958 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔊 Submarine | Субмарина” (@sbmrne), 13,576 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sbmrne.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
