Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ru.фонда [и не только]

Channel

ru.фонда [и не только]

@sber_po_300

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002076391728
TypeChannel
Username@sber_po_300
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sber_po_300

Growth

3510 Aug 2026, 01:45 — 35 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 23:31 — 35 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:4510 Aug 2026, 23:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:3135no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:4535first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
129
Videos
17
Links
69

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🗿14100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jun 2026, 16:40 UTC7 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juno_blog

От Менгера к Биткоину Любой уважающий себя автор по экономике в введении к своей книге так или иначе объясняет читателям, что экономика — это не точная наука, а гуманитарная. Современный мир живёт в ложной концепции, которую английские экономисты закрепили в конце XIX века во время так называемой маржиналистской революции. До 1890-х годов экономика повсюду называлась политической экономией «Political Economy». Это н

20 Jun 2026, 16:40 UTC7 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juno_blog

В девяностые годы та же логика индивидуального действия и сопротивления монополии встретилась с криптографией в движении шифропанков. Люди вроде Эрика Хьюза и Тимоти Мэя исходили из того, что сильная криптография, это инструмент, позволяющий людям обмениваться и действовать без доверенной третьей стороны. Их манифест прямо утверждал: приватность необходима для открытого общества в электронную эпоху, и мы должны созда

28 May 2026, 19:28 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

как же хорош этот автор. любуюсь!

🗿1

28 May 2026, 19:28 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juno_blog

Zcash замена деду? Ты смотришь на график, где цена уверенно ползёт вверх, а в ленте то и дело мелькает: «Zcash — это новый Bitcoin». Внутри что-то ёкает, а вдруг это тот самый второй шанс, который нельзя пропустить? Рука тянется к кошельку. И вот в этот момент самое важное это суметь остановиться. Дело не в том, что Zcash — плохой проект. Наоборот. С 2016 года в его основной сети используются zk-SNARKs, и проект пр

🗿1

28 May 2026, 19:28 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juno_blog

Рынок эти детали, как правило, игнорирует. Он живёт нарративами. Всю весну алгоритм заваливал ленту твитами: «Zcash is the new Bitcoin», «ZEC is insurance against Bitcoin»… За этими тезисами часто стоят вполне конкретные VC-позиции, ротация капитала и желание создать ликвидность для выхода. Фонды умеют менять историю под текущий цикл: вчера AI, сегодня приватность, завтра «страховка от Bitcoin», так когда-то написал

🗿1

22 May 2026, 19:10 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juno_blog

ZK-proofs в 2026 Если объяснить простыми словами, технология ZK-proofs (доказательства с нулевым разглашением) - это подтверждения, где нет посредника. Нет удостоверяемых документов. Нет нотариуса. Нет банка. Ты подтверждаешь свой возраст, баланс, KYC, но не показываешь свой паспорт, полный баланс кошелька или историю транзакций. Выборочное раскрытие информации на основе чистой математики. В мае 2026 года zkVM (вир

🗿1

22 May 2026, 19:10 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juno_blog

Нам необходимо понимать, что сервер централизует процесс. В большинстве ZK-rollup’ов (zkSync, Starknet и другие) генерация пруфа (proving) до сих пор часто сидит на централизованных кластерах или prover-as-a-service. Верификация (проверка) — да, децентрализованная, любой может проверить пруф за копейки. Но без пруфа вся система стоит. Это как замок с математически идеальным замком, но ключ от него всё равно у одного

🗿1

18 May 2026, 19:27 UTC12 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @markettwits

🇷🇺#депозиты #россия Средняя максимальная ставка по вкладам топ-10 банков России снизилась до 13,04% -- ЦБ Дальнейшее снижение ставки ЦБ приведет к перетоку средств из депозитов на брокерские счета, прогнозируют в ВТБ mt в max

🗿1

6 May 2026, 19:49 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Михаил Ивлиев, «Черная кровь мертвого моря»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sber_po_300. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 859,487 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ru.фонда [и не только]” (@sber_po_300), 35 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sber_po_300.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.