Channel
@saxonenjoyers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
133subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002099349173 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saxonenjoyers |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saxonenjoyers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 133 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 132 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 132 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 133 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 424 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BREAKING: Flock Safety plans to expand its nationwide surveillance network by converting up to 350,000 Uber, Lyft, and delivery vehicles into roaming license plate scanners, vastly increasing real-time vehicle tracking capabilities. @GeneralMCNews
🤬1
Signed Johog Anglecynn
Oh ok then
Signed Johog Anglecynn
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Johog Anglecynn
I'm not particularly convinced that some of the higher end companies are worth the price anymore. These are Beez mag pouches, and they are astoundingly meh in quality. Very flimsy sheet nylon construction with single stitching leaves a lot to be desired as far as quality assurances are concerned. I also have a Beez chest rig and was struck with similar feelings when first taking it out of the packaging. It's odd know…
Signed Johog Anglecynn
Hasan Piker says he wants to FLOOD illegals into the United States so they can "fuck your sisters and daughters" to "destroy the White race" “We’re here to destroy the White race, bitch.”
💩1
Signed Johog Anglecynn
Video, posted without a caption
🔥1
Signed Johog Anglecynn
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Johog Anglecynn
Stop being so insecure. Stop pretending it's just a game. Stop being scared of the "you weren't in the heckin military" insult. Stop caring what normies think. Stop worrying about social media validation from anon accounts or people with ranks and titles that you'll never meet irl. The people under your watch might not even take it seriously, but they need you to. Bad times ARE coming. They're always coming. The vene…
❤1
Signed Johog Anglecynn
05/08/2026 Corsica 🏳️ Corsican nationalists announced during a clandestine press conference, where they appeared armed, that they were ready to take up arms again and resume attacks in response to what they described as the replacement of the local population by “invaders,” which they claim threatens Corsican traditions and the very survival of the Corsican people. They also stated that French elected officials and…
Signed Johog Anglecynn
Nigger in Charlotte NC with 14 prior arrests is randomly attacking white women on his live stream
🤬1
Signed Johog Anglecynn
Charlotte police have arrested Diquan Hunt for the attacks on ⚪️ women. He will be charged with assault with a deadly weapon. He has already been arrested 14 times, of course. T.me/TheWesternChauvinist1
Signed Johog Anglecynn
This savage nigger was live streaming himself targeting white women on the street, brutally beating them, knocking them out on the street, and continuing to beating them while unconscious. 32-year old Diquan Hunt of Charlotte, North Carolina is a violent career criminal, with 14 prior arrests.
🤬1
Signed Johog Anglecynn
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @saxonenjoyers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 646,513 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“saxon enjoyers” (@saxonenjoyers), 133 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saxonenjoyers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.