Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Саторик.

@satosugr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001814424967
TypeChannel
Username@satosugr
Created18 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/satosugr

Growth

505150.57 August 2026 — 51 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:4650no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:2750-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:5951first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.4%
avg views ÷ 50 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.2
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held11 (19 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total352
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
513
Videos
93
Links
37

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 29s
Average length
2m 45s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘1132.4%
custom 6152036349345010319617.6%
💊514.7%
custom 6154624737155747536411.8%
custom 615193032378234029038.82%
custom 615420240872656441538.82%
custom 615457309446898131025.88%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC20 viewsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

1 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC21 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤍🤍🤩🤩🤩🤩🤍 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Ты снова стоишь на знакомом балконе, Где в прошлом остался сплошной деструктив. Где спайсом запахло на старом бетоне, А в плеере — «4 Позиции Бруно », мрачный мотив. Затяжка. И тлеет в руках сигарета, И так же до пепла сгорает душа. Луна над домами разлилась по свету, И ты на неё созерцаешь, дыша. Ты помнишь её: этот взгляд её честный, Глубокий, любимый до боли в груди. Она — как

custom 61519303237823402903custom 61542024087265644153custom 61546247371557475363

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

31 Jul 2026, 22:54 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @esterrsanVideo

🙂🌟 🙂🌟 🙂🌟 🙂🌟 🙂🌟🙂 🤩🤩🤩🤩🔡🔡🔡🤩🔡🌟🤩 🤩🌟🔡🤩🔡🤩🔡🔡🤩🔡🌟 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 🌟 🙂ïnțerń➿🌟➿🙂døćtôr🌟 ☕️🙂bårņęy…🙂…ăġęnť🙂 ⚠️ 🌟 🙂nűršę🌟🌟🌟h. nūrșē🙂🌟 🌟🙂 râttħęw-🙂- şeċręťarý🙂⚠️ 🩸🙂 ănømąłŷ🤩 🧬🧬🧬🧬🧬

💊1💘1

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

30 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC18 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @teosan_nPhoto

☺️ 赤ずっと塗り込ん 🎀🎀🎀 だ やっぱずっ良かった イヤらしい線だな 今もう❕ 🌟🌟

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

29 Jul 2026, 20:00 UTC34 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @esterrsanPhoto

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 2️⃣🔣🔣 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🤩-@esterrsan 🤩-@etobrobrbr #animalhospital

💘2💊1custom 61520363493450103191

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

28 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @esterrsanPhoto

Spoiler🤫 Сможете добить 50 реактов и я выложу вторую часть 🙂@esterrsan 🙂 @veshalkaALOO 🙂@sunflowermeo #animalhospital

💊2💘2

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

23 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC52 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

5 лет игры Мона решила выпасть со стандарта и наконец то коломбина 🤩

custom 61520363493450103193💘2custom 61546247371557475361

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

19 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC55 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Жертва маркетинга ...

💘4custom 61520363493450103192custom 61545730944689813102

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

19 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC55 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Cv : @zefiraine

💊1

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

19 Jul 2026, 01:01 UTC46 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @chmonya_777Photo

Ну себе тоже надо летнюю картину, так что я по-быстрому туда сюда нарисовала🌺

Signed Саторик. #wlwgod #llovemywife

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @satosugr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Саторик.” (@satosugr), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satosugr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.