Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

wanee 0% coffee!!🧋

@etsum1i

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

276subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002055078100
TypeChannel
Username@etsum1i
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/etsum1i

Growth

275276275.56 Aug 2026, 13:06 — 275 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 275 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:58 — 276 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:067 Aug 2026, 12:58
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 275–276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 12:58276+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:32275no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:06275first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
77.6%
avg views ÷ 276 subscribers
Avg views / post
214
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (8 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,285
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @etsum1i. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC86 views0 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

пока что работаю над всякими бебе проектами👊 поэтому могу только закосы вам дропать вот кохане смотрите🤩

Signed ецу!’✧.࿐

31 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC110 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @etobrobrbrVideo

🙂🌟 🙂🌟 🙂🌟 🙂🌟 🙂🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🔡🔡🔡🤩🔡🌟🤩 🤩🌟🔡🤩🔡🤩🔡🔡🤩🔡🌟 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 🌟 🙂ïnțerń➿🌟➿🙂døćtôr🌟 ☕️🙂bårņęy…🙂…ăġęnť🙂 ⚠️ 🌟 🙂nűršę🌟🌟🌟h. nūrșē🙂🌟 🌟🙂 râttħęw-🙂-şeċręťarý🙂⚠️ 🩸🙂 ănømąłŷ🤩 🧬🧬🧬🧬🧬 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

Signed ецу!’✧.࿐

26 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC305 viewsread 6 August 2026

у меня еще достаточно сильные проблемы с фоном, в связи с тем, что я не так давно переехала🦫 так что пока фоны будут вас расстраивать (у менч сейчас просто нет стен, к которым можно подойти)

Signed ецу!’✧.࿐

26 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC258 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

с управлением еще не разобралась

Signed ецу!’✧.࿐

21 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC237 viewsread 6 August 2026

купите ради руикаса страничек со мной и май🤍

Signed ецу!’✧.࿐

21 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC289 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @onetwoartbookPhoto

☆.。.:・°☆.。 [ПРЕДЗАКАЗЫ на 1, 2 ARTBOOK!] ・°☆.。.:・°☆.。.:・°☆. Предзаказы открыты с 21 июля (21.07) и продлятся до 23:59 12 сентября (12.09) ✧༝┉┉┉┉┉˚❋ ❋ ❋˚┉┉┉┉┉༝✧ Информация об артбуке ⭐️Первый зин по секаю в твердом переплете 💫Более 130 страниц и 80 участников, включая авторов, писателей и косплееров 💫Горизонтальный А5 формат ✨К заказу доступна PDF-версия ⭐️Более 40 позиций мерча Так ж

Signed ецу!’✧.࿐

11 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC290 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ehguosssvorVideo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 собственно,само наше дефиле. безумно нравится сама задумка и реализация вышла довольно неплохой! лололошка 🤩🤩🤩🤩

Signed ецу!’ ʬʬʬ [etsum1i]

11 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC271 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ehguosssvorPhoto

некие слезы счастья мы умнички

Signed ецу!’ ʬʬʬ [etsum1i]

8 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC317 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ehguosssvorPhoto

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 наконец-то нормальный анонс на лолосхождение. будем с ецу в лолоцестах «китайское ау» выступаем 8-м номером👋 〰печати изгнания,видимо,перестали работать..〰

Signed ецу!’ ʬʬʬ [etsum1i]

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @etsum1i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 142,692 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“wanee 0% coffee!!🧋” (@etsum1i), 276 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etsum1i.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.