Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Salar Seyf

@salar_seyf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,987subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001316557292
TypeChannel
Username@salar_seyf
Created28 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/salar_seyf

Growth

1,9641,9871,975.56 August 2026 — 1,965 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,965 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,964 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,979 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,987 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,961–1,990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:581,987+8
9 Aug 2026, 21:521,979+15
7 Aug 2026, 03:541,964-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:311,965no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:231,965first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.7%
avg views ÷ 1,987 subscribers
Avg views / post
788
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held20 (6 June 202626 July 2026)
Views total2,365
Reactions total58
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

409 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍18545.2%
5713.9%
👌5313.0%
👏5313.0%
🙏276.60%
👎256.11%
😱40.978%
💯20.489%
🔥20.489%
🗿10.244%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 409reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC533 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/py0pIzRTRY0?si=UdYW65Tr3YW-dJV1

👍8👎2🙏2

19 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,010 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

توئیت: امریکا در حال حمله به پل‌ها و زیرساخت‌های غیرنظامی از جمله انبار غله، ایستگاههای قطار، ریل و پلهای بین شهری ایران است. براساس معاهده ژنو و پروتکل الحاقی آن حمله به این تأسیسات در زمان جنگ ممنوع است(مواد ۵۱،۵۴،۵۶ پروتکل الحاقی اول). @Salar_Seyf

👍31👎31🗿1

17 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC822 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/xQSTpjJGi4U

5👍2👎1🔥1🙏1

14 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,340 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

عمق آب (بایتریمتری) در تنگه هرمز به نفع کیست؟ در سواحل شمالی (ایران)آب بسیار کم‌عمق است و یک فلات قاره پهناور با شیب ملایم وجود دارد که عمق آن بین ۱۰ تا ۴۰ متر متغیر است . این وضعیت از نظر نظامی و استراتژیک کاملاً به نفع ایران است، زیرا محیطی ایده‌آل برای پنهان‌کاری زیردریایی‌های کوچک ایران و مین‌ریزی ایجاد می‌کند که ناوگان‌های بزرگ فرامنطقه‌ای در آن به شدت آسیب‌پذیر هستند. در سواحل جنوبی(عمان) بستر دریا به سرعت فرو

👍21👎3🔥1🙏1

14 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC780 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

با توجه به ژرفای آب و سطح فلات قاره ایران و خندق عمان در #تنگه_هرمز، برتری جغرافیایی با شمال آن است یا جنوب؟ کشتی‌های سنگین در بحران از چه مسیری عبور کنند؟ @Salar_Seyf

👍6👎1

14 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC665 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @risstudies

چرا نباید در تحلیل سیاست خارجی و امنیّت ملّی از روش SWOT استفاده کرد؟ ✍️ سالار سیف‌الدینی، دکترای جغرافیای سیاسی از دانشگاه تربیت مدرس روش سوات، که به عنوان ابزاری برای برنامه‌ریزی بنگاه‌های اقتصادی طراحی شده، به‌تدریج در حال تبدیل شدن به یکی از رایج‌ترین چارچوب‌های تحلیل در حوزه سیاست خارجی و امنیّت ملّی ایران است. اما این رویه، بازتاب ساده‌سازی بوروکراتیک مسائل پیچیده است زیرا سرشت سیاست و امنیّت، برخلاف محیط ت

4👍2👏2👎1

11 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC≈2,520 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اطلس چالش‌های ژئوپلیتیکی ترکیه و یونان در مدیترانه شرقی مدیترانه شرقی امروز به یکی از پیچیده‌ترین میدان‌های رقابت ژئوپلیتیکی تبدیل شده است. این اطلس، مهم‌ترین محورهای اختلاف میان ترکیه و یونان را از دریای اژه تا سواحل قبرس و لیبی در یک تصویر واحد نشان می‌دهد: از مناقشه بر سر جزایر، مرزهای دریایی و منطقه انحصاری اقتصادی (EEZ) گرفته تا دکترین «وطن آبی»، اکتشاف منابع گاز، توافق دریایی ترکیه و لیبی، و رقابت بر سر کریدور

5👌3👍2👏2

10 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,160 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اطلس ژئوپلیتیکی رقابت ترکیه و اسراییل ▫️روابط ترکیه و اسرائیل را نمی‌توان صرفاً با فراز و فرودهای دیپلماتیک یا بحران‌های مقطعی توضیح داد. رقابت میان دو کشور امروز در مجموعه‌ای از میدان‌های ژئوپلیتیکی جریان دارد؛ از شرق مدیترانه و منابع انرژی گرفته تا سوریه، ایران، فلسطین، عراق، قفقاز جنوبی، کریدورهای ترانزیتی، دیپلماسی منطقه‌ای و رقابت‌های نظامی. ▫️هر یک از این میدان‌ها منطق و پویایی خاص خود را دارد، اما در عمل به

👍4👏32🙏2👎1

10 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,120 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مقایسه بودجه نظامی ترکیه و اسراییل در یک دهه گذشته ▫️تا پیش از جنگ غزه، بودجه دفاعی دو کشور از حدود سال ۲۰۱۸ به بعد به یکدیگر نزدیک شده بود و فاصله چندانی نداشت. ▫️ترکیه طی این دوره رشد تدریجی و نسبتاً باثباتی را تجربه کرد که عمدتاً ناشی از توسعه صنایع دفاعی بومی، عملیات‌های برون‌مرزی در سوریه و عراق، و نوسازی نیروهای مسلح بود. ▫️اسرائیل در سال ۲۰۲۴ جهشی بی‌سابقه داشت و بودجه نظامی آن به حدود ۴۶ میلیارد دلار رسید

🙏6👍41

10 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC≈2,820 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مروری بر تاریخچه شکل‌گیری منطقه پرواز ممنوع در شمال عراق اصولاً منطقه پرواز ممنوع در قالب حقوقی شورای امنیت سازمان ملل میسر است اما تجربه عراق نشان داد امکان‌های دیگری نیز برای دور زدن قوانین بین الملل وجود دارد. در تجربه عراق مشخص شد که تفسیر موسع یکی از بندهای قطع نامه ۶۸۸ مورخ ۱۹۹۱ مجمع عمومی، علیه رژیم صدام در خصوص «اجتناب از سرکوب مردم عراق» می‌تواند در کنار اجماع جهانی درعمل به برقراری منطقه پرواز ممنوع منجر

👍93😱3👎1

9 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC990 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

آیا روسیه از بسته بودن تنگه هرمز سود می‌برد؟ پاسخ به این پرسش پیچیده است، هم آری هم نه. در این یادداشت استدلال خواهیم کرد که اختلال محدود (کوتاه مدت) و در نتیجه افزایش ریسک ژئوپلیتیکی تنگه هرمز برای روسیه بد نیست هرچند بسته بودن دائمی آن (که اصولاً ممکن نیست) به ضرر روسیه است. روسیه یکی از بازیگرانی است که از یک اختلال کنترل‌شده در تنگه هرمز می‌تواند منفعت مستقیمی در صنعت انرژی ببرد. اما اگر انسداد از یک حدی فراتر ر

👍11👏2🙏21

9 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC670 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تغییر الگوی واردات «فرآورده‌های نفتی» چین پس از جنگ چهل روزه این نمودار درباره «فرآورده‌های نفتی» (بنزین، گازوئیل، نفتا، سوخت جت و...) است. ▫️منحنی نشان می‌دهد که با آغاز جنگ آمریکا و اسرائیل علیه ایران، چین تقریباً واردات فرآورده‌های نفتی خود از خیلج فارس را متوقف کرده است. ▫️در ۲۰۲۵حدود ۴۱٪ از فرآورده‌های نفتی وارداتی چین از خلیج‌فارس تأمین می‌شد، اما این سهم در اردیبهشت و خرداد یا مه ۲۰۲۶ به نزدیک صفر رسید و ه

👍6👏2🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @salar_seyf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 123,303 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Salar Seyf” (@salar_seyf), 1,987 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salar_seyf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.