4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,497–1,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 08:48
1,498
-2
9 Aug 2026, 23:34
1,500
-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:06
1,502
no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:22
1,502
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
1m 22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
336 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
114
33.9%
👍
82
24.4%
👎
42
12.5%
👏
41
12.2%
🔥
16
4.76%
🕊
14
4.17%
😭
7
2.08%
💔
6
1.79%
💩
4
1.19%
🤡
4
1.19%
😁
3
0.893%
👌
1
0.298%
😢
1
0.298%
😨
1
0.298%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جنگ و مردم
امروز توفانی از خبرها یکییکی میرسید. ساعاتی پیش ترامپ گفت محاصره دریایی را دوباره بر ایران اعمال میکند. دقایقی پیش سنتکام اعلام کرد از فردا حصر دریایی آغاز میشود و نیویورک تایمز در خبری اطلاع داد ترامپ به کنگره اطلاع داده جنگ با ایران از سر گرفته شده است.
از فردا خبر نداریم – از هفتهٔ بعد، ماه بعد. بیش از حد توانمان سرد و گرم شدهایم و روحمان از دیماه خونریزی میکند. اما تا وقت هست، تا ارکستر مخالفا…
طبیعت ایران در چنبرهی جنگ؛ هراس از تکرار یک فروپاشی
به قلم ایمان ابراهیمی
چهارده سال پیش، زمانی که قدم در مسیر حفاظت از حیات وحش گذاشتم، گمان میبردم ابزار من دوربین و دوربین چشمی است؛ اما زود دریافتم که این مسیر، پیش از هر چیز با «روایتها» آغاز میشود. روایتهایی که در دل بیابان، کنار آتشِ محیطبانان قدیمی و لابلای بخار چای، بازگو میشوند. در میان تمام خاطرات تلخ و شیرین این مردان سپیدموی، برههای هست که زبان در…
اگر از مردم عادی هستید (سیمکارت سفید نیستید، برای تبلیغ جریان سیاسی مزدی نمیگیرید، انتفاع مادی از وضعیت کنونی نمیبرید) انقد به هم نپرید. به هم انگ وطنفروش -صرفاً بابت ابراز خوشحالی یا عدم خوشحالی درباره شروع، ادامه و پایان این جنگ- نزنیم. امیدوار باشیم این جنگ نهایتاً با پیروزی ملت ایران تمام شود. الان وقت به هم پریدن نیست.
@IranianPlateau
امروز سالروز اعلام نتایج همهپرسی سال ۵۸ است؛ بر اساس آماری که در آن زمان منتشر شد، اعلام گردید که ۹۸٫۲ درصد شرکتکنندگان به نظام جمهوری اسلامی رأی مثبت دادهاند.
@IranianPlateau
تاریخ همواره شاهدی بر این واقعیت تلخ بوده است که «شجاعتِ محض در برابر تکنولوژیِ برتر» محکوم به شکست است. نبرد چالدران در سال ۱۵۱۴ میلادی، نماد بارز این رویارویی بود. در یک سو، سوارهنظام زبده و متعصب صفویان قرار داشت که با تکیه بر «شرف نظامی»، استفاده از سلاح گرم را بزدلانه میدانست و به تیغ شمشیر و تیرِ کمان بسنده میکرد؛ و در سوی دیگر، ارتش عثمانی با بهرهگیری از پیادهنظام مدرن و آتشبار سنگین توپخانه، آرایشی کام…
پست امروز ایلان ماسک از اهمیت تنگهی هرمز!
۴۰۴ سال پیش، ایرانیان به ۱۱۵ سال سلطهٔ پرتغالیها بر هرمز پایان دادند و جزیره را بازپس گرفتند.
این فقط یک پیروزی نظامی نبود؛ بلکه توازن قدرت در منطقه را دگرگون کرد. با شکستن کنترل بر یک گلوگاه حیاتی، ایران صفوی یک واقعیت ماندگار را نشان داد: کنترل جغرافیای استراتژیک میتواند حتی قدرتمندترین امپراتوریهای دریایی را به چالش بکشد.
چهار قرن بعد، تنگهٔ هرمز بار دیگر در مرکز…
وقتی از ایران دموکراتیک و سکولار صحبت میکنیم، یعنی «قانون» برای همه ایرانیان از هر تبار و زبانی، لباسی یکسان میدوزد. مگر کروموزوم و DNA یک هموطن کرد با یک یزدی، خراسانی یا ترکمن متفاوت است؟ مگر دردِ ناشی از بیعدالتی و فقر برای یک کرد، سوزندهتر از دردِ یک بلوچ یا لر است؟ اصرار بر ذکر نام یک گروه خاص در قانون اساسی، نه تنها بوی دموکراسی نمیدهد، بلکه آغازی است بر تبعیضهای جدید و تافته جدابافته پنداشتنِ بخشی از …
اتنیک یا پولیس؟ نزاع بر سر معنای سیاست است!
شخصی در بیبیسی فارسی گفت که از واژه «اتنیک» بهجای «اقوام» به دلیل احترام به آنها استفاده میکند؛ اما واژه اتنیک ذاتاً مودبانه نیست. «اتنیک» از واژه یونانی ethnos آمده است که در یونانی باستان برای اشاره به «دیگری» به کار میرفت، نه برای خودِ یونانیان. یونانیها خود را با واژههایی مانند demos (یا پولیس) تعریف میکردند، اما ethnos اغلب برای اقوامِ بیرون از پولیس (شهر) …
❤6👍2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @IranianPlateau. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 667,693 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@IranianPlateau named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@iranianplateu named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فلات ایران” (@IranianPlateau), 1,498 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IranianPlateau.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.