Channel
@NPPERSIA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
356subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002474822316 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NPPERSIA |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NPPERSIA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 356 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 358 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 359 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 359 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 February 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 937 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
180 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 76 | 42.2% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 27.2% | |
| 🤬 | 13 | 7.22% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 4.44% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.89% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 3.89% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 2.78% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.67% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.67% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 1.67% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.11% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.556% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.556% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.556% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.556% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
شکوه مشروطیت؛ ابداع نوآیین در انطباق با منطق وجودی کشور مجلس دارالشورای ملّی بهعنوان مجلس مؤسسانِ نهادهای نوآیین دولت-کشور ایران، در شرایطی که بحران عمیق در حوزههای مختلف حیات ایرانیان فراگیر شده بود، دست به ابداعی استراتژیک در تأسیس نهادی زد؛ انتخابی برخاسته از آگاهی مؤسسان و در عین حال، مقید به مقدورات و الزامات ناشی از روح زمانه، مناسبات نیرو و امکانات موجود. آگاهی مؤسسان، خود متأثر از آگاهی ملّی و ایدۀ تاریخی…
👍5🔥1🤬1
به یاد استاد علیرضا شاپور شهبازی #استادان_و_نااستادان (۴۸) #ابراهیم_موسی_پور_بشلی دانشجوی استاد بزرگ، زندهیاد شهبازی نبودم اما ایشان به معنای کامل کلمه استادم بود و چیزهای بسیار از او آموختم. وصف دانش و بزرگی او در نوشتههای بسیار آمده و ازجمله من نیز در ادای دینی به پیشگاه ایشان از زندهیاد #ابوالفضل_خطیبی درخواستم که زندگینامه و فهرستی از آثار ارجمند او برای دانشنامهی جهان اسلام و کتابی که از چند مقالهی ش…
🔥2❤🔥1😍1
تصنیف «گریه را به مستی» آهنگ و شعر: عارف قزوینی (۱۳۲۸ ه.ق.) با صدای عبدالوهاب شهیدی دلا خموشی چرا؟ چو خم نجوشی چرا؟ برون شد از پرده راز تو پردهپوشی چرا؟ @NPPERSIA
🕊4❤2🤝1
The Rational Politics of the Iranians It must be known that rational politics… is of two kinds: The first is that in which interests are observed in general, and the interests of the king, in the continuity of his realm, in particular. This politics was specific to the Persians and was based on the method of wisdom. … The second kind is that in which the interest of the sultan and the manner of consolidating kingshi…
👍6👏1
ایشان مسعود الفک مسئول بخش فارسیِ العربیه عربستان است و یکی از کارشناسان تجزیه طلب تلویزیون ایران اینترنشنال. در این ویدئو ادعاهایی را مطرح می کند که سالهاست تجزیه طلبها و تروریستهای پانعربیست و الاحوازی آنها را پیگیری می کنند. جعل و دروغ سازی هویتی و تاریخی برای خوزستان. ادعاهایی که بارها مستند پاسخ داده شده است اما این جماعت به رغم اطلاع از دروغ پردازی های خود، تنها راه گریز این سرزمین از ایران را در پیگیری همین …
👍7🤝1🤬1
سیاست عقلیِ ایرانیان «باید دانست که سیاست عقلی… بر دو گونه است: یکی آنکه در آن، مصالح، بهطور عموم و مصالح پادشاه، در تداوم مُلک او، بهخصوص، مراعات شود. این سیاست به ایرانیان اختصاص داشت و مُتکی به روش حکمت بود. ... گونۀ دومْ این است که در آنْ مصلحت سلطان و کیفیت استوار شدن پادشاهی از راه قهر و غلبه و دستدرازی مراعات میشود و مصالح عمومی، در این روش، فرع بر مصالح سلطان است. این سیاست از آنِ دیگر پادشاهان جهان است،…
👍7✍1❤1
در باب ایدهٔ ایران و مفهوم وحدت در کثرت ایرانی هویت ایرانی، برخلاف اکثر کشورهای جهان که فراوردههای متأخر جهان مدرن هستند، شالودهای کهن دارد؛ شالودهای ملّی که کثرتها و تنوعات اجتماعی و فرهنگی را ــ همچون اجزائی نسبت به یک کل ــ بر بنیاد خود حفظ و همزمان به آنها صورت و هویتی واحد بخشیده و میبخشد. در این معنا، ایران بهمثابه کشور، فرهنگ و تمدن، نه نفیکنندۀ تفاوتهای درونی خود، بلکه ملّتی بوده است که زیرمجموعهها…
❤7✍1
در مقام قیاس، میتوانیم به ترکیب دو عنصر طبیعی کُلُر و سدیم اشاره کنیم که هر یک بهتنهایی مادهای مضر برای بدن انسان هستند. اما از ترکیب آن دو عنصر مادهای پدید میآید که آدمی بدون آن زنده نمیماند؛ یعنی نمک خوراکی. با این حال، نمک طعام را نمیتوان از اجزاءِ منفرد آن ــ یا با تجزیه اجزاء آن ــ شناخت. هویت و وحدت ملّی ایرانی نیز چنین است. وحدتی که کثرتها و تنوعاتی درون خود دارد، ولی همزمان، روحی استعلایی است که نمی…
👍2✍1
نسبت جدید و قدیم و شرایط امکان تأمل درباره «سنت» [جغد مینروا شبهنگام بال میگشاید] اگرچه تأسیس اندیشۀ تجدد با آغاز دورۀ جدید تاریخ مغربزمین امکانپذیر شد، اما شالودههای آن در درون تأملات سدههای میانه فراهم آمده بود و به دنبال دریافتهایی نو، در قلمرو بحثهای کلامی-دینی، که در برابر اصطلاح via antiqua یا روشِ متقدِّمان، از آن به via moderna تعبیر کردهاند و ابنخلدون، به مناسبت بحث از علمِ کلامِ متأخران، از آن ب…
👍6✍1
نظریه انحطاط؛ بهعنوان مقدمهای بهسوی آگاهی ملّی و گذر از «روشنفکریهای خیالاندیش» آنچه میان پژوهشگری جدّی مانند ادوارد سعید، که به زبانی که مینوشت تسلط داشت و منابع عمدۀ تحقیق خود در حوزۀ ادبیات را میشناخت، و نویسندگان تُنُکمایهای مانند احسان نراقی و آرامش دوستدار، که حتی زبان مادری خود را نیز بهدرستی نمیدانند، مشترک است، بیاعتنایی به پیچیدگیهای واقعیتهایی است که به نظریهپردازی دربارۀ آنها خطر میکنند.…
👍4✍1
آنچه باقی ماند، آنچه او ــتا جاودانــ جاویدِ کیهان بود، سر فراز و سرورِ تاریخ دوران بود، ایران بود... ایران بود. @NPPERSIA
❤7💯1🤯1
فوکو در مستعمرات جای شگفتی نیست که، در میان روشنفکران کشورهای عقبمانده، حتی در میان سنتیترین آنها، چنانکه در ایران میتوان دید، بخشهای ایدئولوژیکی نوشتههای میشل فوکو طرفداران بسیاری یافته است. میگوییم: «بخشهای ایدئولوژیکی نوشتههای میشل فوکو»، زیرا آنچه کمتر شناخته شده فوکوی تاریخنویس اندیشه است، اما همان فوکو، ایدئولوگ ترقیخواه و چپ، در نظر، و میراثخوار مسمومترین فراوردههای استعمار فرانسه، در مغربِ عربی(…
❤5👏2👍1🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NPPERSIA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 320,842 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سیاست ملّی” (@NPPERSIA), 356 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NPPERSIA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.