Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Логово Sa2rna

@sa2rn909

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002689988274
TypeChannel
Username@sa2rn909
DescriptionХз не придумал
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/sa2rn909

Growth

5155539 Aug 2026, 12:31 — 51 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 21:12 — 55 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:01 — 55 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 12:3110 Aug 2026, 08:01
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:0155no change
9 Aug 2026, 21:1255+4
9 Aug 2026, 12:3151first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.7%
avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
Avg views / post
55.4
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held11 (4 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total609
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
233
Videos
16
Links
21

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
34s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2866.7%
👍49.52%
🔥37.14%
custom 542273389011876002424.76%
👎24.76%
custom 529400257481751479912.38%
custom 540462182834795053812.38%
💔12.38%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTC22 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @dog00pipiPhoto

Чтож прошла лира! Всем удачи отдохнуть, отоспаться, и набраться сил 💪 Всем спасибо за мероприятие!!

🔥3

9 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC30 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Лира 😜

6👎1custom 52940025748175147991

9 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC21 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @discoelysimcfVideo

на пати на световике сидел Ким и был вот этот прекрасный момент проверка на убеждение Кима потанцевать пройдена успешно Тгк Кима - t.me/sa2rn909 🪩 | #тейк | @discocfbot

3

9 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @foxovichPhoto

💛

custom 54227338901187600242

9 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC37 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @pooooon4Video

Я и кто? Извините Уксус и Sa2rna я честн не хотела.

5

9 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC80 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6

8 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC83 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Зато завтра буду на Лире🥳

👍2👎1

8 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC81 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Очень жаль что я не смог придти на Андерсходку😢

👍2💔1

4 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC89 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Top10SadDeathsinAnimePhoto

🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏 ♠️♠️♠️⭐⭐⭐⭐♠️♠️♠️♠️ ⬛️⬛️⬛️🃏🃏🃏🃏⬛️⬛️⬛️ 🎎🎎«Даже если ты потерялся, 🎎🎎в конце ты найдешь 🎎🎎все ответы. Даже если ты страдаешь, за этим лежит счастье.» ♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️ 🀄️ фотограф/ретушь

4 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ra1n0paintPhoto

🌡👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾👾⬆️ —Сколько тебе уже, говоришь? — 26🤪 — Сколько?! Именно этот диалог происходит, когда кто-то пытается узнать мой возраст 🧳 Я могу сказать, что уже стала достаточно важной тёткой (и на работе тоже), но мои друзья наблюдают картину на втором коллаже и не верят. Да и я не верю, ладно...😁 Мне всё время кажется, что ещё пару раз рядом со мной кто-то пошутит про 67 и моё стойкое лицо в этот момент сломаетс

1custom 54046218283479505381

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @sa2rn909. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 606,404 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Логово Sa2rna” (@sa2rn909), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sa2rn909.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.