Channel
@foxovich
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
294subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001978683672 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @foxovich |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/foxovich |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 294 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 289 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 285 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 280 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 277 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 274 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 274 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
132 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5904693829922987415 | 40 | 30.3% | |
| custom 5904601449471418571 | 28 | 21.2% | |
| custom 5904628078268653256 | 22 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5902466829250470391 | 10 | 7.58% | |
| custom 5904703635333324395 | 9 | 6.82% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 6.82% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5904393165032398752 | 5 | 3.79% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| custom 5904722872491845985 | 1 | 0.758% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Гифт на день рождения от Лисары! Спасибо огромнейшее, он прекрасен! Моя первая фигурка от Jakks, между прочим 🤩 #stuff@foxovich
custom 590462807826865325610custom 59046938299229874158💘6custom 59046014494714185712custom 59043931650323987521
#photo@foxovich
custom 590469382992298741516custom 59046014494714185719custom 59046280782686532569custom 59047036353333243952custom 59047228724918459851
👽🧦™️🦄🛼🥑🐈™️🪀🍷 Представь, что мы делаем с тобой парный косплей. Кого будем делать и почему? 👁 Или кем ты меня видишь в пару к уже своему сделанному образу? 😇
custom 59046014494714185718custom 59046938299229874155❤4custom 59047036353333243951
🌡👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾👾⬆️ —Сколько тебе уже, говоришь? — 26🤪 — Сколько?! Именно этот диалог происходит, когда кто-то пытается узнать мой возраст 🧳 Я могу сказать, что уже стала достаточно важной тёткой (и на работе тоже), но мои друзья наблюдают картину на втором коллаже и не верят. Да и я не верю, ладно...😁 Мне всё время кажется, что ещё пару раз рядом со мной кто-то пошутит про 67 и моё стойкое лицо в этот момент сломаетс…
custom 59047036353333243956custom 59024668292504703914custom 59043931650323987524
💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 Время познакомить с теми, чьи голоса будут объявлять ваши прекрасные номера и сопровождать вас в течение всего мероприятия! Чёрный Пёс Уважаемые гости, добрый день! Меня зовут Чёрный Пес, я косплеер с 2021 года. На данном мероприятии я буду в качестве ведущего. Ранее вы могли наблюдать за моей работой на сцене в рамках мероприятий «Ликорис Фестиваль» и «Реосанрайз». Для меня является большой честью вновь …
❤5custom 59046938299229874155custom 59046280782686532563custom 59024668292504703911
Ну и куда же без этих фоток с того самого вокала 😼 #event@foxovich
custom 59046014494714185719custom 59046938299229874156custom 59024668292504703915❤🔥2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @foxovich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“foxovich” (@foxovich), 294 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxovich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.