Channel
@ruverture
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004265516282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruverture |
| Description | Traduction des articles des médias indépendants russes. |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 22 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruverture |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 7 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 7 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 6 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 27 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Je vois de plus en plus de vidéos en ligne de Russes qui retournent des États-Unis et de l'Europe en Russie. Les gens sont sincèrement émerveillés par ce à quoi nous sommes déjà habitués et que nous ne remarquons même plus. Par exemple, je fais renouveler mon passeport. Je remplis une demande sur le site des services gouvernementaux, je passe 10 minutes au bureau de l'immigration, j'attends une semaine ou deux, et..…
Dans la continuité de mes réflexions sur l'"Occident imaginaire" et sur la persistance de ce mythe – "tout est meilleur là-bas, en Amérique" – dans l'esprit de nos citoyens. Ainsi, Yurchak décrit le phénomène des années 70 : les emballages importés, les paquets de cigarettes, les disques, et les inscriptions en langue étrangère, comme des vecteurs non pas d'une idéologie, mais de fantasmes sur l'Occident. Les boutei…
Alexei Yurchak a écrit un livre intitulé "C'était pour toujours, jusqu'à ce que ça se termine". Yurchak, sociologue et anthropologue américain, a vécu en Russie et travaille actuellement à Berkeley. Dans ce livre, il introduit le concept d'"Occident imaginaire". Un chapitre entier y est consacré. Voici l'essentiel. Dans les années 70 et 80, les Soviétiques achetaient non seulement des biens occidentaux utiles, comm…
À propos de Voltaire et de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Écoutez, citoyens, quelle pagaille ! Il y avait un certain Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Ce citoyen, dès sa jeunesse, se distinguait, comme on dit, par une étonnante capacité à feindre, à mentir et à mettre la main sur le bien d’autrui. On peut dire qu’il était un égoïste hors du commun, plein de vanité et d’une arrogance telle qu’on en envierait le coffre à bijoux. Il parl…
👍1
Une ancienne employée de la CIA révèle carrément au journaliste Tucker Carlson que lorsque les États-Unis ont envahi l'Afghanistan, ils ont forcé les agriculteurs locaux à cultiver exclusivement du pavot à opium afin d'inonder la Russie et la Chine d'héroïne. C'est bien sûr une "vérité évidente", mais quand un ancien haut responsable de la CIA le confirme sur une plateforme d'information américaine de premier plan, …
L'objectif de l'UE est un super-État européen. Les réfléxions aux raisons de la transformation de l'UE en un super-État unifié. Quelques nuances. L'unification de l'Europe en un seul État est un processus objectif, qui n'est pas dû au fait que « une génération d'élites européennes, élevées dans de riches universités, de bons restaurants et des discothèques », soit devenue complaisante et supérieure aux autres natio…
Mais l'inconscient n'est pas seulement composé d'impulsions, c'est aussi de l'intuition. Bekhtereva a beaucoup parlé de l'intuition non pas comme de mysticisme, mais comme d'un processus de calcul. L'inconscient traite 11 millions de bits par seconde. Il voit des schémas que la conscience ne remarque pas. Il compare des données que la conscience ne peut pas retenir. Il tire des conclusions à partir d'informations qui…
Pas parce que vous êtes devenu plus spirituel, mais parce que les lobes frontaux sont devenus plus forts. Physiquement, neurologiquement, de manière mesurable.
Toute sa vie, Bekhtereva a étudié cette frontière entre le conscient et l'inconscient et a découvert que l'inconscient n'est pas un chaos, un sous-sol sombre, une décharge de désirs réprimés. C'est un centre de calcul d'une puissance incroyable. Il traite 11 millions de bits par seconde. Il prend une décision 400 millisecondes avant que vous en preniez conscience. Il contrôle votre vie, et vous pensez que vous la con…
Dialogue intérieur, visualisation, des questions au lieu d'affirmations - trois outils de reprogrammation. Mais tous fonctionnent au niveau conscient, et 95% du travail du cerveau se fait inconsciemment, sous la surface, dans l'ombre, là où la conscience n'arrive pas.
Des questions. Pas des affirmations, mais des questions. Le cerveau ne peut pas rejeter une question. Une question n'est pas une affirmation, c'est une requête, une recherche, une exploration. Le cerveau est obligé de chercher une réponse. C'est sa nature. Il ne peut pas ne pas chercher. Posez une question, et le cerveau commencera à chercher une réponse. Automatiquement, en arrière-plan, sans votre participation. « …
Le dialogue intérieur. La voix dans la tête. Celle qui commente tout ce qui se passe. Celle qui évalue, critique, loue, effraie, motive, détruit. Cette voix n'est pas vous. C'est un programme enregistré dans les réseaux neuronaux, lancé automatiquement, fonctionnant sans interruption du matin au soir. Dans le sommeil - sous forme de rêves. Sans pause, sans interruption, sans bouton "arrêt". Bechtèreva a étudié le dis…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ruverture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,099,917 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RUverture” (@ruverture), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruverture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.