Channel
@russkiyvybor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
102subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002402532459 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @russkiyvybor |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/russkiyvybor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 102 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 101 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 101 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 24 | 54.5% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 20.5% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 18.2% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всё правильно, Иван. С адекватным законодательством можно всегда выхватить пистолет и заметно поубавить боевой дух нарушителей спокойствия. Но увы, повторимся, " при адекватном законодательстве", а не как у нас сейчас https://t.me/iotrakovskiy/11076
💯4
Друзья, никто не ответит, ибо у наших многоходистов девиз: Своих не бросаем! ( с) https://t.me/riakatysha/46180
💯2
Именно переворот они и готовят https://t.me/riakatysha/45048?single
Красава! В Одессе чел с цепью разогнал шоблу тцкашников
🔥7
Евгений, к сожалению, Вы слишком наивны. В том, о чем Вы пишете, и есть суть нашей системы. https://t.me/riakatysha/44813
💯2
Подобные рекомендации покажутся очевидными, и, тем не менее, пригодятся в наших реалиях
👍3
Судя по развернувшейся активности в деле глушения интернета, нас ждёт новая смута. На носу транзит власти и ряд решений, которые явно не понравятся народу, поэтому средства коммуникации ограничиваются, или отключаются вовсе.
💯1
У наших админов аналогичные вопросы, что и у Павла https://t.me/riakatysha/44725
💯3
Пружина антинародной цензуры сжимается, и дальнейшее существование таких национально-патриотических организаций, как Русская Община и Северный Человек в ближайшее время может оказаться под большим вопросом. Для нас стал нонсенсом сам факт их возникновения в эпоху либерального безвременья, и, к сожалению, эти объединения с большой долей вероятности ждёт судьба небезызвестного РНЕ, Русского народного единства. Слишком …
👍3
Парни из "Телеграма" перегружают сервера РКН "мусорными" запросами. Продолжайте в том же духе, дайте за щеку всяким Угрюм-Бурчеевым, оказывается, в такие игры можно играть вдвоём👌
🔥1
Вдогонку к предыдущему посту https://t.me/narubeze/1188
🙏1
Коллеги, не забываем- задача выиграть, победить укрорежим у наших властей не стоит в принципе! https://t.me/roy_tv_mk/19396
💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @russkiyvybor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Русский Выбор” (@russkiyvybor), 102 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russkiyvybor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.