Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rus Santos Aveiro

Channel

Rus Santos Aveiro

@russantosaveiro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

363subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002114366939
TypeChannel
Username@russantosaveiro
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/russantosaveiro

Growth

363364363.57 August 2026 — 364 subscribers8 August 2026 — 364 subscribers15 August 2026 — 363 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 363–364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:03363-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:32364no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:32364first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6082.2%
🔥34.11%
❤‍🔥22.74%
🤡22.74%
🤣22.74%
👍11.37%
💯11.37%
🖕11.37%
😍11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2026, 12:47 UTC431 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rus_santos

«Знаешь чувство, будто забуксовал? Будто свернул не туда и путь стал замысловат?» Простите за такую цитату, но она неплохо отражает суть этого поста, который разойдётся по нескольким каналам. Это – новое место, где меня можно прочитать, услышать или увидеть. Каналы Rus Santos Aveiro и Комбаровщина стали не тем, что я хочу называть своим медиа. При том, что их сразу два, я не чувствовал какой-то свободы писать о то

8❤‍🔥2🤡1

9 Apr 2026, 12:46 UTC408 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, сейчас будет самый важный репост в истории канала.

2

7 Apr 2026, 21:40 UTC424 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

По факту. https://t.me/LSR_RM/79359 Жуть, как не хватило Куртуа и Менди – тех, благодаря кому команда могла бы сегодня чуть менее бояться своих промахов. Я не знаю, возможно ли это, но ОЧЕНЬ хочется увидеть этих товарищей в ответном матче. Непосредственное сопротивление безумным Олисе и Кейну. Есть ощущение, что во второй раз Нойер уже не выдаст прайм. Главное – в обороне перестать чудить. К этому есть предпосыл

2🤣2

7 Apr 2026, 20:56 UTC285 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Охеренный матч получился для любого зрителя. Убеждён, что в Мюнхене мы можем забрать победу. Этих придурков подвела реализация, не было проблем с созданием моментов абсолютно. P. S. Как же потешно выглядят посты про матч «лучшей команды мира «Арсенал» на фоне действительно хорошего футбола.

4

7 Apr 2026, 20:33 UTC259 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Диктатор малость оправдан.

1

7 Apr 2026, 19:57 UTC258 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И опять игроки «Реала» круто прессингуют на половине поля «Баварии». При разной интенсивности давления команд эффективность одинаковая, по крайней мере визуально.

3

7 Apr 2026, 19:52 UTC242 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У меня есть ощущение, что Оливер мог бы легко ставить пенальти на Винисиусе в самой концовке тайма. Подножка была – видать, уважаемая английская бригада посчитала контакт недостаточным, но это смешок. Выиграть это противостояние вполне реально. «Бавария» удобна «Мадриду», как и ожидалось. Грустно от ЖК Тчуамени – в ответке посмотрим на Камавингу. Ну и подводит жоска реализация, конечно. Нойер пока не делает удивит

3

7 Apr 2026, 17:31 UTC216 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Команда года в АПЛ – из того, что предлагает EA, составил такую тиму. Местами прям очень сложно было. Не потому что много крутых кандидатов, а наоборот, к сожалению https://tots.easports.com/en-gb/premierleague/voting

3

7 Apr 2026, 17:20 UTC207 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Браим провёл очень слабый матч, поэтому за его исключением победный состав не меняю», – Килиан Мбаппе.

3

7 Apr 2026, 15:20 UTC163 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уже меньше 4 часов до такого матча, ёмаё! По сему поводу давайте прикинем сценарий, по которому Арбелоа обыграет Компани и компанию (ха-ха). • Питарч и Тчуамени – база, на которой всё и будет строиться. Если эти бродяги выдержат натиск, то и всё остальное должно получиться. • Альваро и Трент – мастхэвчик. Хотя и тяжело будет ТАА сдерживать Диаса, выпускать Карвахаля выглядит ещё более авантюрной идеей. • Вини, Ва

2

7 Apr 2026, 13:56 UTC161 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥹 *** Хотя сам выпуск неплохой. Фактуры как будто не хватило, но та, что представлена, добротная. В комментариях справедливо отмечали технические проблемы ролика, но мне как-то всё равно на это. Я кликаю на всё, что связано с «Реалом» Моуринью – и такую тему почти никак не испортить.

2

7 Apr 2026, 11:48 UTC≈11,000 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Братья, сгоняю всех вас в одно место – в канал Алибека, легендарного автора нашего сайта. Вы наверняка видели его культовые статьи, если нет – ещё есть шанс исправиться. Вот тут он, кстати, рассказывает самую святую историю: как «Реал» помог «Манчестер Юнайтед» встать на ноги после Мюнхена. 🇰🇿🫵

5🖕1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @russantosaveiro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,507,929 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rus Santos Aveiro” (@russantosaveiro), 363 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russantosaveiro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.