Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BRIEF

Channel

BRIEF

@rusbrief

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

2,282subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002186312588
TypeChannel
Username@rusbrief
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rusbrief

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2792,2872,2835 August 2026 — 2,287 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,283 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,285 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,282 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,280 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,279 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,281 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,282 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,281 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,281 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,282 subscribers2,2825 August 202618 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 43 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,278–2,288 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:222,282+1
17 Sept 2026, 22:442,281no change
9 Sept 2026, 16:162,281-1
4 Sept 2026, 17:382,282+1
29 Aug 2026, 01:582,281+2
26 Aug 2026, 05:132,279-1
23 Aug 2026, 07:372,280-2
20 Aug 2026, 02:282,282-3
16 Aug 2026, 19:572,285+2
12 Aug 2026, 22:432,283-4
5 Aug 2026, 22:192,287first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 232 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Винокурова, Екатерина Владимировна (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…анонимного [[Telegram-канал|телеграм-канала]] BRIEF{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/rusbrief/127434|title=BRIEF. Официальное|website=Telegram|access-date=20…”
read 13 September 2026
Кризис в Нигере (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…инструкторы и специалисты по безопасности ЧВК{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/rusbrief/142958 |title=Несколько консультантов группы Вагнер прибыли сегодня…”
read 13 September 2026
Носов, Дмитрий Юрьевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…ru/p/1566904 |url-status=live }}{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/rusbrief/108284 |title=Telegram: Contact @rusbrief<!-- Заголовок добавлен…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BRIEF” (@rusbrief), 2,282 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rusbrief.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.