Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RUHONIY

Channel

RUHONIY

@ruhoniyuz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

214subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001808385549
TypeChannel
Username@ruhoniyuz
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ruhoniyuz

Growth

2122142136 August 2026 — 212 subscribers7 August 2026 — 212 subscribers14 August 2026 — 214 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 212–214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:34214+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:32212no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:53212first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
105.1%
avg views ÷ 214 subscribers
Avg views / post
225
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,698
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 20 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5528.9%
🙏3518.4%
custom 5312026254751313956115.79%
🤝105.26%
🔥84.21%
😢84.21%
custom 516827339011653681773.68%
👍73.68%
👏52.63%
custom 524681444774118303942.11%
custom 525360486834558621742.11%
custom 531019709689943500842.11%
💯42.11%
custom 547005855850038245031.58%
31.58%
🤨31.58%
🥰31.58%
custom 536168673680189861521.05%
custom 542484488372462035721.05%
🤯21.05%
9 further kinds105.26%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ruhoniyuz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC154 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Muqaddas Kitob qanaqadir qotib qolgan matn emas, balki Tirik Xudoning biz insonlarga O'zini qadamma-qadam tanitgan tarixidir. Teologiyada biz buni progressiv vahiy deymiz. Qadimgi Ahdda ➡️Xudo O'zining yagonaligiga urg'u berdi, chunki o'sha paytda atrofni butparastlik va ko'pxudolik egallagan edi. Yangi Ahdda ➡️ Xudo yagonalik oddiy va zerikarli emasligini, balki O'z tabiatining ichki boyligini — Ota, O'g'il va Muq

3custom 53120262547513139562👍1👏1

1 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC207 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Qadimgi Ahddagi Xudo - qattiqqo'l, jazolovchi va shafqatsiz. Yangi Ahddagi Xudo esa - rahmdil, sevuvchi va kechirimli. Balki siz ham qayerdadir shunga o'xshash gapni eshitgan boʻlishiz mumkin. Shunda, mantiqan olib qarasak, biz masihiylar bir-biriga zid bo'lgan ikkita turli xudolarga ishonamizmi? Yo'q, aslida bu gʻoya ilk bor II asrda Markion ismli shaxs tomonidan o'ylab topilgan va uning bu qarashlari Jamoat tomon

3🙏2custom 51682733901165368172

30 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC173 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Shu paytgacha o'z gunohlari sabab uyatdan yashirinib yurgan iymonli, endi qochishi, berkinishi befoyda va mantiqsiz. Chunki bizni qidirayotgan tirik Xudoning qo'llarida tayoq emas, rahm-shafqat bor. Mana shu sevgini his qilib anglab yetayotgan inson o'z gunohlari va barcha qo'rquvlarini yengib o'tadi va Xudo tomon dadil qadam tashlashni boshlaydi. Chunki u biladi: endi u yo'qolgan emas, balki topilgandir. O.S. #kec

4custom 53120262547513139563custom 52468144477411830392👍1😢1

30 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC147 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gunoh kimni oldida tan olinib e'tirof etilishi kerak? 📓 Qadimgi Ahdda gunohni e'tirof etish Xudo bilan ahd munosabatlarini tiklashning asosiy qismi bo'lgan va u ikki hil ko'rinishda namoyon bo'lgan: ♥️ Shaxsiy e'tirof: Tavrotning 3-Levilar 5:5 misrasida gunoh qilgan kishi o'z qilmishiga iqror bo'lishi ruhoniy orqali qurbonlik keltirishi kerakligi aytiladi. Zabur 31 va 50-sanolarida Xudoga qilingan chuqur shaxsiy

custom 53120262547513139563custom 531019709689943500821💯1🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC148 views11 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026

Biz xushxabar aytish yoʻllari va strategiyalarini shunchalik chuqur ishlab chiqdik-ki, amalda xushxabarning o‘ziga vaqt yetmay qolyapti. RUHONIY

3🙏3🤯2custom 53616867368018986152😁1

26 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC269 views9 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Har qanday gina– kudurat, qahru g‘azab, janjalkashlik, g‘iybatchilikni hamda boshqa har xil yomonliklarni o‘zingizdan soqit qilinglar. Efesliklarga 4:31 O'zi Efesliklarga 4-bobning asosiy mavzusi "eski tabiatni o'zimizdan soqit qilib, yangi tabiatni kiyish" bilan bog'liq. 📌 Pavlus ushbu bobda masihiylarni dunyoda normal deb hisoblaniladigan tushunchalar bilan emas, balki Masihga xos xarakter bilan yashashga chaqi

3👏2😢2🤨1😇1

24 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC175 views9 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Abadiylik_sariVideo

Video, posted without a caption

5🙏3custom 54225578694740885841

22 Jul 2026, 06:46 UTC399 views11 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Xochdagi qaroqchi qanday qutqarildi? Yaqinda bir masihiyni boshqa bir pravoslav masihiysiga bergan savolini eshitib qoldim: xochdagi qaroqchi suvga cho'mmagan bo‘lsa, qanday qilib najot topdi? Pravoslav masihiy esa o'zining cherkov an'analariga tayangan holda shunday javob beradi: Qaroqchi Masihning biqinidan oqib chiqqan suv va qon bilan "cho‘mdirildi" va shu orqali najot topdi. Bu fikr ilohiy ramziylik nuqtai na

👍3custom 51682733901165368173custom 531202625475131395621🔥1custom 53101970968994350081

21 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC477 views8 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Ilohiyotni o'rganishning asosiy bo'limlari bilan tanishamiz. ➡️ Barcha narsaning negizida ekzegetika yotadi, qadimgi yunon ἐξηγητικά, ἐξήγησις so'zidan olingan bo'lib, «talqin qilish, bayon etish» ma'nosini anglatadi. Aynan shu bosqichda matnlar talqin qilinadi, olingan ma'lumotlar asosida esa qolgan bo'limlar quriladi. ➡️ Bundan tashqari, germenevtika alohida ajratib ko'rsatiladi, qadimgi yunon ἑρμηνευτική so

2🫡2custom 51682733901165368172🙏1custom 54248448837246203571

19 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC359 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Men maqsadimga yetdim yoki kamolotga erishdim, deb aytolmayman. Ammo men unga yetishay, deb intilaman, chunki Iso Masih aynan shu maqsad uchun meni O‘ziniki qilib olgan. Birodarlar, men o‘zimni murodimga yetishganman deb o‘ylamasam-da, faqat bir narsanigina o‘ylayman: orqamda qolganlarni unutib, oldimdagilarga ko‘z tikaman. Filippiliklarga 3:12-13 ➡️ Shaytonning eng katta hiylasi ham insonni oʻz oʻtmishiga qul qili

🔥4custom 52536048683455862174💯3🙏32🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ruhoniyuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 255,604 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RUHONIY” (@ruhoniyuz), 214 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruhoniyuz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.