Channel
@rugfreeplanet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
598subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001690316678 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rugfreeplanet |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 19 September 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rugfreeplanet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 598 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 600 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 600 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
37 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 75.7% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 16.2% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2022 to 9 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hello Everyone! We have recently partnered with @crmoon They are a crypto marketing agency that provides Marketing Services for all kinds of crypto projects Check them out here https://t.me/crmoon
👍1
We're accepting Advertisements on our bot. Price can be discussed in DM @Rugfreeplanetadmin
Some quick news I want to share with you. A few minutes ago, I tweeted tagging Cz that people are selling their shitty services only because "Cz follows them" https://twitter.com/RugFreePlanet/status/1631626056137424897?t=OWCJzD2TtbXWNzkYo_AGKA&s=19 Just after 2-3 minutes of that, I started to receive threats of getting my group and bot mass reported and they'll get it down. I don't care if they ban my account, but …
👍8
New Chains Update 🚀 @RugFreeBot now supports these chains For Detailed Reports: •Arbitrum •Ethereum •BSC •Polygon •Cronos •Harmony •Avalanche •Optimism •HECO •Gnosis •OKC •KCC •Fantom For Honeypot Alert: •Polygon •ETH •BSC •Cro While /chart supports every chain supported on dexscreener (61 as of now)
🔥4
You'll see a lot of people saying DYOR(including me), but what does it even mean? Here is how you DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH, (specially for lowcaps) • Transparency: Transparency of team matters alot, you can't trust your funds with people you know nothing about. • Contract: Make sure contract is clean and there is no bad code, for ex: owner shouldn't be able to stop trading, set fees at 100% or manipulate code. • Liquidi…
🔥2
RugFree Planetㅤ [On Mission to End RugPulls] pinned a photo
Hey RugFreeFam! We've a news to share with you.. Many of you know that we started rugfreebot with the intentions of keeping it not just free, but Ad-Free as well.... But due to current circumstances, it has become hard for me to continue it without having to make some money. I had been running it on my own funds for a long period of time, but I fear if we don't accept ads, we'll have to shut the bot down.. We'll use…
🎉 I'm thrilled to announce that @RugFreeBot new now provides 📈charts for 61+ blockchains. You can get chart from any of these information • Token Name • Token Symbol • Contract Address • Pair Name • Pair Address We support alot of common formats, for example: /chart floki /chart shibweth 4h /chart 0xcdb9016f678519b6f53770b9f1672c13464198f3 /1D floki /1m 0xcdb9016f678519b6f53770b9f1672c13464198f3 And some more format…
🎊 We're excited to announce that @RugFreeBot is now available in Chinese for both private chat and groups. To change language, type /setlang in private chat, or in group if you're group admin. Join Chinese discussion group: @rugfreechina 🎊 我们很高兴地宣布，RugFreeBot现已支持中文私聊和群聊。要更改语言，请在私聊中输入/setlang，或在群组中输入（如果您是群组管理员）。加入中文讨论组：@rugfreechina
A quick reminder that you (as admin) can use /turnon in your group(once in lifetime) to turn on auto honeypot checker feature on. Enabling it will check every contract posted in your group for HoneyPot 🍯, however it will not generate a whole rug report, just a simple honeypot message with basic info like gas fee,buy sell tax.
My Take on what's going on with #PiNetwork Thread 🧵 https://twitter.com/RugFreePlanet/status/1609188189339516929?t=vCz_ZKeYTVz6CcAREA540A&s=19
Seems like those Leaked APIs from 3Commas are available on dark web for sale(Binance and KuCoin APIs) Make sure to revoke your current APIs and generate new ones (if needed.) Stay Safu #RugFreePlanet
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rugfreeplanet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Too much Fud about Binance, what's your take?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2022 to 9 June 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 149,626 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RugFree Planetㅤ [On Mission to End RugPulls]” (@rugfreeplanet), 598 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rugfreeplanet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.