Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mr. Ape Calls

@mr_apecalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,115subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001401830986
TypeChannel
Username@mr_apecalls
CreatedBetween 1 November 2018 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mr_apecalls

Growth

1,1151,1161,115.57 August 2026 — 1,116 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,116 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,115 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,115–1,116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:431,115-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:161,116no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:061,116first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥850.0%
👍531.3%
212.5%
🖕16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2022 to 31 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 May 2024, 11:47 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

We are thinking of starting calls again, share your opinion plz

  1. Shall we share new calls ?0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Apr 2023, 15:43 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US dollar has lost 98% of its purchasing power since 1971. 📰 Full Story @WatcherGuru

5 Apr 2023, 14:36 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: Cash App founder Bob Lee stabbed to death in San Francisco. 📰 Full Story @WatcherGuru

4 Apr 2023, 22:59 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Former President Trump's NFT sales have increased by 251% following his arrest. @WatcherGuru

22 Mar 2023, 18:44 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 FED Chair Jerome Powell says "the banking system is safe." @WatcherGuru

14 Mar 2023, 12:36 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 7 August 2026

CPI: 6% YoY, 0.4% MoM Forecasted: 6% YoY, 0.4% MoM Core: 5.5% YoY, 0.5% MoM Forecasted: 5.5% YoY, 0.4% MoM |

3 Mar 2023, 18:23 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: Binance partners with law enforcement agencies to launch anti-scam campaign. 📰 Full Story @WatcherGuru

26 Jan 2023, 07:42 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Bitcoin Inu Buy! 🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡 💵 0.067 ETH ($108.07) 🪙 79,804 BTCI 🪪 0xac56…dd18 | Txn | Track ⏫ Position +46.98% 🔘 Market Cap $126,154 📊 Chart 🗳 Buy Now ⚡️ Events 🥇Trending 🔥 Trending #6 ETH TRENDING

26 Jan 2023, 07:36 UTC≈1,590 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Inu Good entry building nice floor here market cap is about 140k with solid team and nice rewards. https://t.me/bitcoin_inu

👍2🔥21

18 Jan 2023, 13:04 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: 🇵🇱 Binance gains regulatory approval to offer crypto services in Poland. @WatcherGuru

18 Jan 2023, 04:19 UTC≈1,640 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Matrix l ERC Loading a bag, looks good on chart. Also team is based so guys have a look https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xa9e12a6ef7b3a0bc71882f7eedac428b2863993f https://t.me/Matrix_Inu_Erc

🔥1

30 Dec 2022, 10:15 UTC≈1,610 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x570c76d296b6de2c7c097ed116ecf48ae1d73e10 Locked for 3 months. Tax 2/2. Last one went over a mill with some hype. https://t.me/AmaterasuEntry Calledby: @mr_apecalls

👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mr_apecalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 May 2024, 11:47 UTCAnonymous Poll1 voter

We are thinking of starting calls again, share your opinion plz

  1. Shall we share new calls ?0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2022 to 31 May 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 889,881 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mr. Ape Calls” (@mr_apecalls), 1,115 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mr_apecalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.