Channel
@rude_art
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
870subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001889828978 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rude_art |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rude_art |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 870 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 872 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 872 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
158 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 72 | 45.6% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 28.5% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 12.0% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 4.43% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 3.80% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 1.90% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 1.90% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.633% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.633% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.633% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2024 to 27 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вот и традиционный пост про лучший подарок в том числе и на Новый Год.🎄 Лучше чем в прошлогоднем посте не споешь-не скажешь. Год назад делал видео. Тогда казалось нормально) Как нейро продвинулось за год! Две большие разницы! Подробнее про подарок здесь: N1gift.ru
👍2
Ну что мы все накинулись на Ларису? Прямо жалко ее становится, обездоленную, нельзя же так.😯 Я отменяю запрет смотреть Ларисе на звезды и выть на Луну. Теперь она может смотреть на звезды днем и выть только на полную Луну. Пусть воет.
👍3🔥2
А вот тоже подумал не остаться в стороне и запретить Ларисе смотреть на звезды (мой свет от звезд) и выть на Луну! А имею на то право и хочу проявить позицию!😎 А будет лето, так и загарать запрещу и на рассветы с закатами и радугами смотреть. Ибо нефиг! Про право мое на свет от звезд подробнее тут: n1gift.ru
🔥4👍2👏2💯1🤣1
Друзья! А помогите мне пожалуйста выбрать имя для бота (оно звучит только в приветствии). Не задумываясь, на что йокнуло😉
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Меня часто спрашивают (ну, по-крайней мере, я читаю немой вопрос у каждого встречного в его глазах): «Что там нового у твоего анти-курительного бота?» Отвечаю: Живет и работает с усердием, как ему и положено. С усердием его даже пришлось дополнительно бороться. Иногда он любил задавать вопросы из теста и анкеты по второму разу мотивируя это тем, что на всякий случай лучше же уточнить. 🤪 Победили это его стремление п…
👍5
В Perplexity добавили генерацию картинок. Я все больше и больше там. Кто еще не пробовал, то самое время) Бесплатно работает, но за 150 руб можно купить ГОДОВУЮ подписку на plati.ru Отчаянно рекомендую.
🔥5
Сегодня ночью прозвучал один комментарий (случайно удалил) от старого подписчика.🤷♂️ Суть в том, что он крайне не доволен анти курительным ботом. Прямо на столько, что из-за него он покинул канал! А претензия его заключалась в двух пунктах: Нудный он у меня да еще и с реферальной программой! Вообщем встаю на защиту своего бота.💪 Подписчик находился в стадии, когда бот старался узнать о нем информацию, необходимую…
👍4
Мир❗️ Труд❗️ Май❗️ Курить скорей бросай‼️ С последним лозунгом вам поможет мой супер-бот. Подготовит индивидуальную программу, поможет поддержит, успокоит, все расскажет, все подскажет, всему научит и нисколько не наскучит😉 https://t.me/AiStopSmoking_bot
👍5🔥2🎉1
Рожать говорят вообще тяжело, а рожать бота и подавно. Но я его таки родил.🙀 Да в муках, да переношенного на пару месяцев, но пацан здоровый и очень умный!🤓 Как и положено боту, сразу после родов он окунулся в дело, которое так любит его родитель — борьба со злом на фронте курения всего что дымится и парится. Но в отличии от меня он не спит, не устает, все помнит, все знает. Это значит мы нанесем сокрушительный уда…
🔥4👏3👍2🤣2❤1
Искал у себя в канале одну нейронку и наткнулся на пост с дизайном очков. Меня улыбнуло, надеюсь и вас😉: https://t.me/rude_art/331
👍4🔥4
Учиться ведь никогда не поздно? Я тоже так думаю и поэтому пойду 2.02 учиться ИИ агентам на курсы от HuggingFace. Бесплатно и еще диплом дадут! И стану я дипломированным ИИ агенто создателем. Тем более, что планы по их созданию у меня есть. Присоединяйтесь, ибо перспективненько!
👍5
Парад планет можно наблюдать еще три дня! Просто помните чей свет вы смотрите. А так проблем нет, смотрите конечно.😊 Подробнее про собственность на свет от звезд тут n1gift.ru Тем, кто отпишется после этого поста я запрещаю смотреть мой свет.😡
👍5😁4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rude_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья! А помогите мне пожалуйста выбрать имя для бота (оно звучит только в приветствии). Не задумываясь, на что йокнуло😉
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2024 to 27 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,001,594 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Грубый Арт” (@rude_art), 870 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rude_art.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.