Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💥 Подросткам про РПП 💥

Channel

💥 Подросткам про РПП 💥

@rpp_podrostki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

225subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002457923602
TypeChannel
Username@rpp_podrostki
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rpp_podrostki

Growth

220225222.56 August 2026 — 220 subscribers7 August 2026 — 220 subscribers13 August 2026 — 225 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 219–226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:48225+5
7 Aug 2026, 03:17220no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:31220first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.7%
avg views ÷ 225 subscribers
Avg views / post
184
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,572
Reactions total114
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

177 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11967.2%
💯2614.7%
🔥116.21%
👍73.95%
🤝63.39%
🙏52.82%
10.565%
😁10.565%
🥰10.565%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC43 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

☘️ МЫСЛИ ВСЛУХ 🍀 "На протяжении многих лет всё, что я видела, смотря в зеркало, было бледным, уродливым, прыщавым, слишком большим отражением. Я даже не могла назвать это отражение человеком, поскольку ощущала себя каким-то недочеловеком. Я решила, что должна быть недочеловеком по причине того, как я выглядела, хотя всё было с точностью до наоборот. Я видела чудовище, потому что уже поверила в то, что им являюсь. В

5

4 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC234 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🫶 РЕАЛЬНЫЕ ИСТОРИИ 👌 «Всем привет! Я хотела поделиться своей историей — рассказать о том, что даже в самых глубоких безднах может забрезжить свет. Меня зовут Ханне, и до того, как я стала коучем по восстановлению от РПП, я была человеком, который провёл все свои подростковые годы, страдая от расстройства пищевого поведения. Тогда я не верила в выздоровление. Я не думала, что это возможно, а если и возможно, то уж

8

3 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC98 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

☘️ МЫСЛИ ВСЛУХ 🍀 Плохая и хорошая еда только в голове у самого человека. В реальности это всё - просто еда. #мысливслух

5🔥2🤝2

31 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC149 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤱Про родителей подростков с РПП 🤦‍♀ Если у тебя есть РПП, могу предположить, что у тебя могут быть очень непростые отношения с родителями. Потому что с одной стороны, они пытаются тебе помочь (что вполне понятно и объяснимо), а с другой — возможно, тебе кажется, что лучше бы они отстали, не лезли, не трогали, и тогда было бы спокойнее жить. В этой связи я хочу поделиться с тобой результатами одного исследования, о

11🔥6

30 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC173 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

☘️ МЫСЛИ ВСЛУХ 🍀 Если ты переела - это не повод себя винить и ненавидеть, а повод проанализировать, в чем причины переедания и что я могу сделать, чтобы в следующий раз их миновать. Сохранение доброго отношения к себе в сто раз важнее порции лишних калорий. #мысливслух

💯91🤝1

27 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC203 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

☘️ МЫСЛИ ВСЛУХ 🍀 "Нормальное питание - это когда ты садишься за стол голодным и ешь, пока не почувствуешь сытость, а останавливаешься, потому что наелся, а не потому, что так "нужно". Это возможность выбрать еду, которая нравится, и есть её. Нормально питаться - значит выбирать питательную еду, но не переживать из-за этого и не ограничивать жёстко свой выбор, чтобы пропадало удовольствие от еды. Нормальное питание

8

26 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC190 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Выздоровление от РПП может выглядеть очень по-разному!

13

23 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC246 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

☘️ МЫСЛИ ВСЛУХ 🍀 Цифра на весах означает только то, с какой силой твоё тело давит на землю. И больше - ничего. #мысливслух

🙏52

22 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC229 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

💎 ПОЛЕЗНЫЕ МАТЕРИАЛЫ 💎 Что такое 🔤🔤🔤🔤➖🔤🔤🔤🅰️ (самоповреждающее поведение)? "Эта брошюра для тех, кто наносит себе повреждения, для друзей таких людей и семьи. Мы расскажем, что такое самоповреждающее поведение (селф-харм), в чем его причины и как это поменять. Вы также найдете здесь идеи для самопомощи и информацию о том, где искать поддержку". 👆👆👆 #ресурсы

9

20 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC253 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

☘️ МЫСЛИ ВСЛУХ 🍀 Любые запреты и ограничения в еде почти всегда рано или поздно ведут к срывам. #мысливслух

5💯3

20 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC265 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👊 ОЦЕНИ СВОЮ ГОТОВНОСТЬ ПРЕОДОЛЕТЬ РПП! 👊 💢 Шкала мотивации к преодолению РПП для подростков и их родителей 💢 Важное замечание! - Здесь я использую женский род для удобства, но шкала подходит всем вне зависимости от пола. - Описание, соответствующие каждому баллу, основываются на моём опыте работы с подростками с РПП и опыте коллег. Эта шкала не является строгим диагностическим инструментом. И если конкретные описа

7🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rpp_podrostki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 208,190 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💥 Подросткам про РПП 💥” (@rpp_podrostki), 225 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rpp_podrostki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.