Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Артемий про User Acquisition 📈

@romilead

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,099subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584533762
TypeChannel
Username@romilead
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/romilead

Growth

3,0543,0993,076.56 August 2026 — 3,054 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,054 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,056 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,088 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,099 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,047–3,106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:243,099+11
9 Aug 2026, 21:113,088+32
6 Aug 2026, 15:463,056+2
6 Aug 2026, 05:013,054no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:363,054first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.6%
avg views ÷ 3,099 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (2 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,518
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

532 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍36368.2%
🔥16230.5%
🤔71.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 532reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC998 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чем отличается подход русскоговорящих команд от зарубежных Наши не брезгуют быстро скопировать воронку/приложение крупного конкурента на 95% и запустить на неё трафик. Просто делают монетизацию агрессивнее и прайсинг выше — для более быстрой окупаемости. Зарубежные на это редко готовы: чаще стараются следить за брендовыми цветами, не жестят с ценами и избегают близкого копирования конкурентов. В плане креативов наш

👍41🤔2

1 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,810 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ретеншен и LTV подписок в мобайле От ретеншена подписок напрямую зависит LTV приложения. От LTV — по какой цене вы можете закупать триалы. А от цены закупки — потенциал скейла. Вся цепочка отсюда и растёт. Метрика крайне важная и, на удивление, почти не зависит от качества и сложности продукта — гораздо больше от аудитории, которая туда приходит. Подписки бывают разной длительности, и я в очередной раз повторюсь:

🔥21👍3🤔1

27 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC≈2,180 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не FB единым, или как TikTok может окупаться в 3 раза лучше Если приложение носит развлекательный характер, а видео на него набирают в органике десятки тысяч лайков — это может быть продукт для тиктока. На скринах примеры закупки на приложение, сделанной по примеру нескольких продуктов, активно собирающих органику в тиктоке. Попытка теста в ФБ опустила всю веру в продукт — цена триала улетала далеко за $10. Android

🔥15👍7🤔1

21 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC≈2,530 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Страны, которые надо исключать. Индия фактически запретила ребиллы на уровне регулятора — подписки там не продлеваются. Всегда отключайте её и на мобильной закупке, и на веб-воронках. Сам напоролся в конце прошлого года: из 1000+ интро-офферов в Индии было только 3 (!!!) продления, при норме 50%+ на других гео. Смотрите рефанды и диспуты в разрезе стран. Проблемными могут оказаться самые разные гео — и экономные UK

👍43

30 Jun 2026, 16:41 UTC≈2,870 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С кем я вообще работал и работаю? Меня несколько раз просили #кейсы, а также рассказать с какого рода продуктами я работаю. Я решил не называя имен поделиться ими. Список огромный, душнить лонгридами не буду. Сразу оговорка: ниже — исключительно проекты из прошлого, мои неактивные кейсы. Текущие активные клиенты — это вообще отдельный космос, они супер-разнообразные и из абсолютно полярных ниш. Но сегодня решил вспо

👍21🔥11🤔1

25 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC≈2,510 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не забивайте на Google Play Бытует мнение, что в Андроидах нет денег, что этим юзерам нельзя давать бесплатный триал и вообще там не окупить FB трафик. Но это большое заблуждение. В последнее время рынок App Store оказался переполнен вайбкодерами, ревью (без ускорения) может занимать несколько недель, а реджекты налево и направа Apple со своими AI-модераторами не перестает раздавать. Так вот, в Google Play все гора

👍21🔥5

12 Jun 2026, 14:20 UTC≈3,100 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ожило, проверяйте, быстренько они upd - чето нестабильно еще грузит

👍4

12 Jun 2026, 13:45 UTC≈3,130 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

FB на всех профилях висит и не грузит, у вас также?

👍33

29 May 2026, 09:05 UTC≈4,090 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тикток не может спокойно смотреть, как вы сливаете десятки тысяч ежедневно в Мету, а в него сущие копейки. Поэтому упрощает загрузку кампаний, вводя импорт крео из фб. Я сам лично еще не тестил, но возможно для некоторых это заменит креативную стратегию на тиктоке «возьмем виннеры с меты» на параллельное тестирование всего креативного контента. Посмотрим, опробуем. Как и рекламу в GPT, что недавно зарелизили.

👍24🔥12

28 May 2026, 15:57 UTC≈2,980 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему я не делаю и не планирую курс про UA? Меня довольно много раз спрашивали, буду ли я когда-то запускать курс про закупку трафика. Я признаюсь, даже имел желание в 2022-2023 году его сделать и больше сотни слайдов презентации успел сделать. Но дело упирается в практику, а не теорию. Если отбросить душные формулы и таблицы, остается простое правило - в предиктивный плюс лей, а в стопудовый минус не лей. Но все э

👍50🔥15

26 May 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,530 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Никогда не торопитесь отключать кампанию, увидев CPA первого дня, ФБ хорошо оптимизируется, просто дайте ему время. На скрине подписочное приложение (АИ обертка) на Андроид, кампания на US,CA,AU. Именно такое сочетание стран рекомендую всем потестить, дешевле чем US-only но все еще очень качественное по перформансу.

👍20🔥3

21 May 2026, 11:25 UTC≈2,930 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как поднять шансы на успех B2C продукта (приложения) и Что там по бенчмаркам срока окупаемости? Проконсультировав и поработав с десятками продуктов/компаний/команд в последние 5 лет я видел взлеты и падения различных B2C продуктов. Да, в последний год продуктам стало немного сложнее с продвижением и шансы на успех из-за конкуренции и роста CPM чуть снизились, зато создание MVP продукта стало занимать считанные дни,

👍25🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @romilead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 606,138 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Артемий про User Acquisition 📈” (@romilead), 3,099 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romilead.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.