Video message, posted without a caption
🔥31👍8💯7🆒6💘2

Channel
@robotko_vladimir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,347subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001471359922 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @robotko_vladimir |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/robotko_vladimir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 6,347 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 6,360 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 6,361 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 6,365 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 6,365 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,009 reactions across 14 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 607 | 60.2% | |
| 🔥 | 158 | 15.7% | |
| 👍 | 92 | 9.12% | |
| 👏 | 52 | 5.15% | |
| 💯 | 41 | 4.06% | |
| 🙏 | 21 | 2.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 0.991% | |
| 🆒 | 6 | 0.595% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.496% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.496% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.297% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.198% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.198% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.198% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.099% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.099% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.099% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,009reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @robotko_vladimir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 March 2026 to 18 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥31👍8💯7🆒6💘2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥28👍7❤5💯5
💪🏼 продолжаем набирать форму. Белки 200, жиры 70, угли 350. Срезаю чисто угли и очень плавно. Кстати, по сладостям. Уже месяца 1,5-2 как я кушаю каждый день Nuts 🌰. И кушаю его даже когда не хочу, даже через силу. Могу разделить на два раза. Таким образом за эти два месяца у меня не было одного срыва так как нет запрета на сладкое. Кайфую от здоровой разнообразной пищи. P.S. кстати, урезать калорийность сначала нач…
❤51👍7👏6🔥4🤝2
Плотно занялся собой, наконец-то. Три месяца был не там не сям. Сейчас есть ресурс уже и на себя. Три силовые в неделю, три ЛФК в неделю, и небольшой дефицит калорий. Ждем пресс 🫶🏼
❤62🔥9👏7👍2
Бой вечера. Это я рекомендую посмотреть полностью. Илья Топурия VS Джастина Гетджи.
🔥14❤4👏1
Бой Сирила Гана VS Алекса Перейры. Приятного просмотра.
🔥13❤3
Гонг. После которого еще 4 удара от Усика. И только потом рефери влазит. Рико стоит. Я за Саню, но я еще и за справедливость и честность в бою. P.S. еще бы 10-20 секунд, и, думаю, Рико б пал заслужено на помост.
❤17💯4👎3🔥3
Очень болел за Усика. Было грустно видеть, как он в чистую проигрывает Верхувену. 11й раунд. Концовка. Шикарный нокдаун, рефери делает отсчет, остается 9 секунд, но бой продолжается еще 30 секунд почему-то (возможно, был тайм-аут, который не показали нам). Усик добивает, звучит гонг, Усик продолжает бить, Рик стоит, и только потом влазит Рефери (ПОСЛЕ гонга), и останавливает бой. Сюр какой-то. Не справедливо. Рефери …
❤18👍7💯3😁2👎1
Полный бой А. Усика и Р. Верхувена. Ваше мнение, господа?!
👍31❤5👎1
Хочу раскрыть подробно тему кетодиеты. Интересно?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ЛЕКАРСТВО ОТ ТРЕВОЖНОСТИ. С 21 до 37 лет жил с перманентным чувством тревоги. Самое печальное, что не хватало мудрости понять почему. Порой отпускало это, и снова накатывало. А за несколько недель до своего 30го дня рождения, направляясь в кинотеатр, я в метро на Майдані Незалежності прощался с жизнью. Я был убежден, что это сердечный приступ, и я умираю (спойлер: не умер😁). Куча обследований, куча анализов - везде…
❤110💯22👏11🔥5🙏4❤🔥3💋1🤗1
Всех с праздником, православные! С Пасхой! Здоровья всем, и мира в наши дома 🙏🫶🏼
❤125🙏17🔥11❤🔥4🎉1👍1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @robotko_vladimir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хочу раскрыть подробно тему кетодиеты. Интересно?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 18 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,056,528 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ROBOTKO💪🏼” (@robotko_vladimir), 6,347 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/robotko_vladimir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.