Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rick's l Vouches

Channel

Rick's l Vouches

@ricksvouch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001920213819
TypeChannel
Username@ricksvouch
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ricksvouch

Growth

232423.58 August 2026 — 24 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 23 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 09:5423-1
11 Aug 2026, 11:0424no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:0624first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

21 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC665 viewsread 11 August 2026

Bought the recruiting blueprint, worked exactly as promised. Got leads within the first €50 of ad spend. Solid system, would recommend.

3 Aug 2025, 11:23 UTC209 viewsread 11 August 2026

Massive thanks to @acquisitie – helped us secure models for $1,499 and $2,999. By far the best recruiter we’ve worked with.

22 Jul 2025, 07:59 UTC217 viewsread 11 August 2026

@acquisitie made it happen again: 2 models, $999–$1499. Hands down the best recruiter.

29 Jan 2025, 14:58 UTC470 viewsread 11 August 2026

Best decision ever working with @acquisitie – helped me optimize my ads, and now they perform significantly better! Best recruiter for sure.

27 Jan 2025, 16:50 UTC346 viewsread 11 August 2026

vouch @acquisitie, very professional and helpful throughout the process! Helped me in securing a gem model 💯

24 Jan 2025, 17:47 UTC311 viewsread 11 August 2026

Vouch @acquisitie – helped us secure 2 models for $1499. Great communication, easy to work with, and looking forward to growing this partnership!

24 Jan 2025, 14:47 UTC304 viewsread 11 August 2026

Trust @acquisitie to deliver every time – just signed a $999 model and couldn’t be happier.

23 Jan 2025, 21:09 UTC280 viewsread 11 August 2026

Vouch @acquisitie $2500 - good service good model, real hard working girl and everyone happy🤝

14 Nov 2024, 16:04 UTC419 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Hey bro, just wanted to give you an update, the tweaks you gave me for my ads really helped, getting way better quality leads now and the cost of acquiring each lead also went down, really appreciate it!

6 Feb 2024, 18:45 UTC538 viewsread 11 August 2026

messaged @wagwanblud with an issue regarding ads and within 2 minutes of speaking with him, he was able to identify the issue and give me a solution!

5 Feb 2024, 19:56 UTC498 viewsread 11 August 2026

She is so keen to work that she asked me what she has to do to start working with me :)

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ricksvouch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 875,908 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rick's l Vouches” (@ricksvouch), 23 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ricksvouch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.