Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روايات يمنية📚🇾🇪

Channel

روايات يمنية📚🇾🇪

@rewayatyamania

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,934subscribers

-161 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001110703264
TypeChannel
Username@rewayatyamania
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rewayatyamania

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,93320,09820,015.55 August 2026 — 20,095 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,095 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,096 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,098 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,067 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,073 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,061 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,045 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,040 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,044 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,046 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,043 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,033 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,017 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,009 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,007 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,987 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,978 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,964 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,967 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,963 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,955 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,962 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,961 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,960 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,965 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,958 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,947 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,945 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,955 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,953 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,942 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,933 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,934 subscribers19,9345 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,908–20,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:4019,934+1
15 Sept 2026, 06:2219,933-9
13 Sept 2026, 15:2119,942-11
11 Sept 2026, 20:1919,953-2
9 Sept 2026, 06:5619,955+10
5 Sept 2026, 21:1819,945-2
3 Sept 2026, 18:3919,947-11
1 Sept 2026, 14:5519,958-7
31 Aug 2026, 16:2819,965+5
30 Aug 2026, 15:3419,960-1
29 Aug 2026, 17:1219,961-1
28 Aug 2026, 20:2419,962+7
27 Aug 2026, 20:0519,955-8
26 Aug 2026, 20:5519,963-4
25 Aug 2026, 20:5719,967+3
24 Aug 2026, 18:4519,964-14
23 Aug 2026, 01:0319,978-9
21 Aug 2026, 15:5419,987-20
20 Aug 2026, 16:0820,007-2
19 Aug 2026, 17:1320,009first reading

Engagement

195 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.01%
avg views ÷ 19,934 subscribers
Avg views / post
800
141 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
141
of 195 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 132 of 141 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held195 (26 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total112,757
Reactions total2,075
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,703 reactions across 181 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,30462.2%
🔥71319.3%
👀1584.27%
👍1012.73%
🤔711.92%
💯671.81%
😭641.73%
💔541.46%
👏501.35%
😢441.19%
🥰200.54%
❤‍🔥190.513%
😱140.378%
🤩100.27%
🌚90.243%
💘30.081%
🍓10.027%
👌10.027%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 181 of the 195 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,703 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:37 UTC618 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

آخر ثلاثة بارتات هنا.. تفاديا للذي بينسخوا ويحذفوا روابطنا

12👍5

2 Sept 2026, 18:58 UTC800 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

❤️‍🩹 بـارتـات يـومنــا الاربعــاء والأخيــرة👆🏻😍

14🤔4

2 Sept 2026, 18:57 UTC772 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

. البارتات الأخيرة من ١١٢ الى ١١٤ هنا👆🏻 https://t.me/rewayatyamania/58944

9🥰6🔥2🌚1

2 Sept 2026, 18:54 UTC793 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026

. البـارت 111 ♤ أحـب حبيبـا يحـب عـذابي فهـل كـان حظـي عـذاب الحـبيب ❤️‍🩹 للكـاتبـة: أميـرة اليمـن 👌🏻👇🏻 😍 📚 @rewayatyamania 🇾🇪 هاجر: نفسييي عتخررج على العنببببب هيااااا سير ادييي لييييي هيااااااا شرف بصراخ: هاااااجر لا تجننيني من وين ادي عنب بسرته بعيون ملان دموع ثواني وانفجرت بكاااء وهي تغطي وجهها بيداتها تنهد بقوةة وتعب وخطي لاقدامها ولمها بيد واحدة لاصدره وهمس: بس بكاء ودلع هاجر بصراخ وهي تحاول تفك ن

12🔥3

2 Sept 2026, 18:51 UTC751 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026

. البـارت 110 ♤ أحـب حبيبـا يحـب عـذابي فهـل كـان حظـي عـذاب الحـبيب ❤️‍🩹 للكـاتبـة: أميـرة اليمـن 👌🏻👇🏻 😍 📚 @rewayatyamania 🇾🇪 يـوم الخطــوبةةة..!!! قبل الظهـر..!!! بغرفة ريم..!!! تكلمت ام مازن بحدة: رييييم خليها تبسر عملهااا للخبالة ريم: بس ما عجبني هذا اللون ام مازن: هي اخبر وادرى بعملها هاجر: مالش هبلا هذا اللون مناسب للفستان وبعدين مادراش بالمكياج انتي ريم بضبح: اوووف خلاص اعملي اللي تحبي هاجر با

13🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 18:50 UTC640 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

. البـارت 109 ♤ أحـب حبيبـا يحـب عـذابي فهـل كـان حظـي عـذاب الحـبيب ❤️‍🩹 👌🏻👇🏻 😍 📚 @rewayatyamania 🇾🇪 عصر ثاني يوم..!!! نزلت الدرج بسرعةة وحماس ولفت على صوت رواء: دلا دلا ما عتطيري ريم بفرحة: لا اتأخر على مازن وامي لغبت لي اتصال من اول رواء ببسمة: الله يسعدكم ريم وهي تخطى: يارب خاطرش . . ركبت فوق السيارة وتكلمت بعدما خطي مازن: انت عارف للبيت مازن بهدوء: ايوةة ابتسمت ولفت لاقدام بحماس..!!! . . بسرتها

6👍3

2 Sept 2026, 18:41 UTC686 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

. البـارت 108 ♤ أحـب حبيبـا يحـب عـذابي فهـل كـان حظـي عـذاب الحـبيب ❤️‍🩹 👌🏻👇🏻 😍 📚 @rewayatyamania 🇾🇪 دخلت ريم بعدما طلبين يبسرنهااا وسلمت عليهن بخزاء وجلست جنب جدتها اخت محمد ببسمة: ماشاءالله صلاة على محمد وآله قمر وحالية ام عزالدين ببسمة: تسلمييي عيونش الحاليات مرة اخو محمد: صف كم انتي ريم بهمس: ثاني ثانوي اسينات بهمس لرواء: ماعرفتها مستحية رواء ضربتها على كتفها وضحكت بهدوء وقفت هاجر ولمت الاقلاص لل

15🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 18:40 UTC649 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026

. البـارت 107 ♤ أحـب حبيبـا يحـب عـذابي فهـل كـان حظـي عـذاب الحـبيب ❤️‍🩹 👌🏻👇🏻 😍 📚 @rewayatyamania 🇾🇪 جلست جنب عمتها بعدما قالت لها تتصل لشرف الدين تبسر وينه لأنه ما بيرد عليها وفزت اول مارد: الوووو ام عزالدين: وين انت من امس يا كلب شرف الدين: ليش ام عزالدين بحدة: وينككككك ما روحت شرف الدين: امسيت عند مرتي الثانيةةة شهقت هاجر وسمعها شرف وابتسم على جنب لوما عرف انها سبب الاتصال وتكلمت ام عز بحدة: تحاكىىى

12👍2

2 Sept 2026, 18:39 UTC648 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

. البـارت 106 ♤ أحـب حبيبـا يحـب عـذابي فهـل كـان حظـي عـذاب الحـبيب ❤️‍🩹 👌🏻👇🏻 😍 📚 @rewayatyamania 🇾🇪 خطي لاجنب الجدار ووقف عرضه دقيقة وبسر محمد خرج وهو بيبسره وينه تكلم وهو بقعته: هانا يا معفن ابتسم بضيق وهو يتقدم منه ويتكلم: ليش ما دخلت مازن بقهر: ما ادخلش عند ناس ما يشتوني محمد وهو يوقف جنبه: الله المستعان مازن: ليش ما بتجاوب على تلفونك ليش مغلق محمد: مدري وين رجمته له ثلاث ايام مازن: وليش يعني محم

17

Showing the 12 most recent of 195 posts we hold for @rewayatyamania. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTCAnonymous Poll90 voters

🍃 كما نطلب منكم تقييم القصة ومدى اعجابكم بها " أكذوبةالزمان"الحب"" للكاتبـة : مداد الــروح " ... وكذلك ليتسنى عرض القادم ... كلما كان التصويت سريع كلما سيكون العرض في وقت اقرب 🍃

  1. ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐46%
  2. ⭐⭐⭐⭐20%
  3. ⭐⭐⭐16%
  4. ⭐⭐28%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

❤️📝 روايات وقصص مميزة 📝❤️
@storykaligi · 38,135
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
فن الطبخ 👩🏻‍🍳🥘
@cook411 · 31,252
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
📚 مستندات روايات pdf
@storykaligi_1 · 28,725
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
📗 قصة وعبرة 📗
@roayati · 90,707
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روايات يمنية📚🇾🇪” (@rewayatyamania), 19,934 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rewayatyamania.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.