21 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC67 viewsread 12 August 2026
о боже что эта бро придумала опять. короче новый дневник, с новым сюжетом будет. не хочу тянуть соки с этого https://t.me/h5tua
Channel
𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭, 𝐅𝐢𝐟𝐭𝐡.
@respectfive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002673522764 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @respectfive |
| Description | дᴏᴘᴏгᴏй дʜᴇʙʜиᴋ, пᴏчᴇᴍʏ я пᴏᴄᴛᴏяʜʜᴏ ʜᴏшʏ ᴋᴏᴄᴛюᴍы? |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 22 April 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/respectfive |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 70 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 70 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 22 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 95.7%
- avg views ÷ 70 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 67.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (22 April 2025 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 67 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 61
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
25 Dec 2025, 22:37 UTC412 viewsread 12 August 2026
пу пу пу... долго я смотрела и перечитывала посты этого канала, писала финал и... совершенно не увидела того самого нужного текста. кажется что это идеальный момент для закрытия. очень долго переписывала, смотрела разные варианты но не то. хочу все оставить так, непонятно, разорвано, грязно и главное в стиле пятого. как никак это дневник и хуй поймешь этого гения)) пусть конечно я перешла в описание от третьего лица.…
20 Sept 2025, 15:07 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 12 August 2026
Он всё чаще ловил себя на том, что думает о ней: Джес, красноволосая ошибка, сбой во временной линии. Её не должно было быть, и именно это сводило его с ума. Он убеждал себя, что её существование просто помеха, как рябь на экране, стоит стереть и порядок восстановится. Но всякий раз, когда он закрывал глаза, перед ним вставало её лицо, резкий смех, вызывающая манера смотреть прямо в душу, будто она знала каждую трещи…
20 Sept 2025, 15:07 UTC757 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
16 Jun 2025, 22:03 UTC≈2,360 viewsread 12 August 2026
Шум. Грохот. Дым. Световые всполохи резали глаза, музыка давила на грудную клетку так, будто сердце пытались завести заново. В клубе невозможно было думать — и, возможно, именно поэтому они оба оказались именно здесь. Пятый сидел у барной стойки, уставившись сквозь стекло бокала, не притрагиваясь к своему третьему — или, может быть, уже четвёртому — напитку. Он терпеть не мог алкоголь. Терпеть не мог клубы. Терпеть н…
16 Jun 2025, 22:02 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
25 May 2025, 21:23 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 12 August 2026
Становится трудно отличить сегодняшний день от вчерашнего. Все они теперь как отражения в тусклом зеркале — одинаковые, безликие, бессмысленные. Я не помню, когда в последний раз просыпался с ощущением, что живу, а не просто продолжаю. Усталость уже не физическая. Это не про недосып и не про боль в мышцах. Это — когда тебе больше нечем реагировать. Ни на радость, ни на страх, ни на чужую смерть. Эмоции не умерли — он…
25 May 2025, 21:22 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
11 May 2025, 08:39 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 12 August 2026
Хватит этих глупых, мелочных обид, которые повисают в воздухе, как недосказанные фразы. Хватит этого напряжённого молчания, за которым нет ни силы, ни мудрости, только упрямство, как у обиженного ребёнка. Ты обижаешься. Молчишь. Ждёшь. На что? На извинения, которых, возможно, не будет, потому что другой человек даже не понял, что произошло. Ты строишь внутри себя крепость на обломках одной фразы, сказанной не так, не…
11 May 2025, 08:36 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
9 May 2025, 13:16 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 12 August 2026
Он заметил её не сразу. Свет стробоскопа дергался по полу, по лицам, по стенам, разрывая пространство на фрагменты. Всё казалось не настоящим — как будто вечер случился не здесь, а где-то в затуманенной памяти. Музыка грохотала, но не входила внутрь. Люди вокруг двигались, смеялись, целовались, теряли друг друга и находили — бесконечно, по кругу. А Пятый просто стоял. С напитком в руке, с отстранённым взглядом, будто…
9 May 2025, 13:15 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @respectfive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,107,722 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭, 𝐅𝐢𝐟𝐭𝐡.” (@respectfive), 70 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/respectfive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.