Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ɯуɯуᴋᴀᴇʍᴄя у нинɜᴇᴧь

Channel

ɯуɯуᴋᴀᴇʍᴄя у нинɜᴇᴧь

@SWF_1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003223606043
TypeChannel
Username@SWF_1
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SWF_1

Growth

464746.512 August 2026 — 47 subscribers13 August 2026 — 47 subscribers13 September 2026 — 46 subscribers12 August 202613 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 32 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 13:5746-1
13 Aug 2026, 00:1747no change
12 Aug 2026, 07:0147first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔360.0%
💋240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC29 viewsread 12 August 2026

ааааа....... тхт которые иногда есть в рекомендациях в счет? мб там есть другие но я правда не шарю за мужские группы, запомнились только эти ребята тк название у них прикольное

Signed 🏹₊˚.𝑠𝑤𝂅ׄ ִℱ୭ʿ

7 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC29 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! И кого-то из мг слушаешь? ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

Signed 🏹₊˚.𝑠𝑤𝂅ׄ ִℱ୭ʿ

7 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

а еще прикиньте, оказывается споти на моей старой почте дал ебу по полной. я не понимала откуда у меня появляется реклама других исполнителей между песнями, А КАК ОКАЗАЛОСЬ он перестал отображать закончился ли у меня премиум лол)) уже второй раз такая хуйня и пришлось зарегистрироваться через новый эмейл и там все ок. конечно грустно обидно, у меня там куча плейлистов еще с 2019 года

💔3

Signed 🏹₊˚.𝑠𝑤𝂅ׄ ִℱ୭ʿ

7 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

та ну прям чтобы заинтересоваться кпоп это наверно виплеш от эспа, если я правильно помню. потому что я помню слушала некоторые их песни как драма, нью левел и какие-то еще, но они проскакивали в рекомендациях плейлиста

💋2

Signed 🏹₊˚.𝑠𝑤𝂅ׄ ִℱ୭ʿ

7 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Какая группа привела тебя в к-поп? Ну или песня ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

Signed 🏹₊˚.𝑠𝑤𝂅ׄ ִℱ୭ʿ

7 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026

Те же самые баннис, которые унижают всех кого можно, хоть и ведут себя ужасно, не доводили никого до суицида

Signed Раиска

7 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026

На данный момент, среди всех возможных новостей из мира кпоп, больше всех известна новость о фд энхайпен и о той девочке Конечно есть новости о том что кто-то кому-то угрожает, унижает итд Но суицид фаната был, как мне известно, только в одном фандоме

Signed Раиска

7 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026

но в целом я не нахожусь активно в фд кпоп, просто тви трещит этой новостью, вот и ахуела малек. щас с утра ахуела что этому айдолу желают также сделать в эфире?? а так я в курсе о том какие бывают токсичны те же блинки. та даже когда в тт сидела не раз видела как фд эспа хуесосили других девушек айдолов. фд кпоп чутка гиблое место, потому что даже читая обычные новости о камбеках натыкаешься на пиздец всякий, а адек…

Signed 🏹₊˚.𝑠𝑤𝂅ׄ ִℱ୭ʿ

7 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026

есть и это расстраивает

Signed 🏹₊˚.𝑠𝑤𝂅ׄ ִℱ୭ʿ

7 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Почему ты не говоришь о проблематичности фандомов у жг? Будто бы там нет таких же ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

Signed 🏹₊˚.𝑠𝑤𝂅ׄ ִℱ୭ʿ

5 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC35 viewsread 12 August 2026

Зная о том, какой у него фандом, человек закрыл на это глаза и высказал свои пять копеек в тот момент, когда делать этого не надо было

Signed Раиска

5 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC33 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed 🏹₊˚.𝑠𝑤𝂅ׄ ִℱ୭ʿ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SWF_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ɯуɯуᴋᴀᴇʍᴄя у нинɜᴇᴧь” (@SWF_1), 46 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SWF_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.