Channel
@reshenie_tvoix_problem
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
416subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002298086869 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reshenie_tvoix_problem |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reshenie_tvoix_problem |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 416 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 415 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 415 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 20 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
220 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 31.4% | |
| 👍 | 63 | 28.6% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 12.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 10.9% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 9.55% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 2.73% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.27% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.36% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.455% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Оцени удовлетворённость своей жизнью
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Мальчиков с детства учат умирать за что-то . Но не дают навыки жизни для чего-то и кого-то . Не смерть вопреки, а жить
❤13💯4
Часто ли ты себя стравливаешь с другими?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
У кого ещё домашне-кухонные дела вызвали тотальное ощущение прокаканой жизни? . Сохраняется ли такое ощущение и сейчас, либо что-то поменялось и от чего это зависело - опиши в комментариях пожалуйста 🙏 . Данную тему нужно раскрывать через угол зрения эмоциональной микрофлоры и работы психоэмоциональных программ поведения⁉️
👍24❤1
💩 ДЕРЬМО СЛУЧАЕТСЯ 💩 "Если ты вляпался в дерьмо не говори что карма, просто смотри под ноги." - Так гласит великая древняя индийская поговорка. . Читая этот пост будьте аккуратны, здесь будет много дерьма, постарайтесь не измазаться) . Есть товарищи, которые считает свою жизнь полнейшим дерьмом. В таком случае может стоит призадуматься, как Вы в это дерьмо угодили? В чём Ваша выгода . Всё, что есть в Вашей жизни хо…
❤32👍12👌6🔥3
Video, posted without a caption
🔥9
Рассматривать в вопросе здоровья только питание будет категорически неверным путём . Важно кроме питания разбираться с тем, как и о чём думает человек, какие у него убеждения и цели и не менее важны ЭМОЦИИ человека с РОДовыми программами поведения . Большинство людей уверены, что они независимые индивидуумы со своим мнением и взглядами на происходящее . У сожалению это не так! По одной простой причине - в нас работаю…
👍15❤7🔥4
👻 Так же Вы сами создаёте дополнительные субличности для защиты, достижения целей или виртуальных друзей, с которыми можете поговорить в ситуациях, когда уже ты получаешь жизненный опыт проходя различные события в своей жизни . Часто видели, как дети говорят казалось бы сами с собой? Но в это время они фантазируют и этом им помогают дополнительные субличности . Однако самой главной субличностью является именно ТА пер…
👍9💯6❤4🔥4🤡1
🧸 Дети учат нас безусловной любви и безусловному принятию ☺️ . 👼🏻Вы только посмотрите в их глаза, в их преданность, в их тотальное всепрощение. Что бы вы не сделали они готовы простить это моментально. От всей души! . 👩🏻Становясь взрослыми мы уже не умеем это делать, слишком много боли, слишком много злости, предательства и ненависти накопили в своих телах . 🙏🏻Учитесь, милые, учитесь у детей! Учитесь заново любить, п…
❤🔥19❤7👏4💯3😭3👍1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥4👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
💯8❤5🔥4
Консультация - часть 3 . 💭Напиши в комментариях какие эмоции поднимаются у тебя внутри и какие в теле ощущения
❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @reshenie_tvoix_problem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Оцени удовлетворённость своей жизнью
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Часто ли ты себя стравливаешь с другими?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 25 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эмоциональная Микрофлора” (@reshenie_tvoix_problem), 416 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reshenie_tvoix_problem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.