Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Откровения под👠каблучника

Channel

Откровения под👠каблучника

@pro_zhizzz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

97subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002472405365
TypeChannel
Username@pro_zhizzz
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 25 November 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pro_zhizzz

Growth

9799987 August 2026 — 99 subscribers9 August 2026 — 99 subscribers22 August 2026 — 98 subscribers29 August 2026 — 97 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97–99 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 14:4497-1
22 Aug 2026, 15:1898-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:0399no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:1499first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 33s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

179 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4826.8%
4424.6%
😁2715.1%
🔥2514.0%
💯1910.6%
🙉63.35%
🙈21.12%
🙏21.12%
🍓10.559%
💅10.559%
🤓10.559%
🤝10.559%
🤡10.559%
🦄10.559%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2024 to 18 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 19 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pro_zhizzz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 November 2024 to 18 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Jan 2026, 15:10 UTC93 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pishevaya_alhimiyaVideo

🔞👹У меня только один вопрос - почему требуя поддерживаться «идеалам» красоты (на самом деле извращенная попытка слепить из женщины девочку с потерей женской красоты) - сами мужчины не сильно готовы резать себя что либо, чтобы соответствовать 🤷🏻‍♂️ никто не готов разрезать себе хер вдоль и сшить в длину или наоборот вдове его сшить, чтобы размер хоть чуть чуть можно было почувствовать, а не мышку норушку суетливую с д

13👍1🔥1😁1

7 Jul 2025, 16:16 UTC≈1,220 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🗣️ Заговорили мы с Юлей не тему того, что вирус власти и денег делает из людей натуральных рептилоидов без тепла внутри . Особенно мне не понятет формат поиск дядями, у которых в трусах уже курага и чтобы встал надо принять фарму заводить себе пластиковую молодую куклу, после чего играть с ней в отношения . Это даже мерзко как-то! Данная барби рядом тупо из-за бабла, но игра в отношения зачем? - поедь заплати и потра

👍20

26 Apr 2025, 11:15 UTC403 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Объясните мне, может я чего не понимаю. В чем суть претензий к мужчине, о поднятом стульчаке? Вот зашла я в гостях туалет, опустила стульчак. Затем через время зашел мужчина, поднял. После опять зашла я, опустила. Вообще никаких проблем. Я просто почему не понимаю, потому что с таким особо не сталкиваюсь. Женя, как он много раз уже писал, предпочитает писать сидя, потому что это лучше для мужской физиологии, поэтом

🔥61

22 Apr 2025, 08:38 UTCviews —

Откровения под👠каблучника pinned «Женщины, которых ласкают мало, неумело или редко, живут, мучимые тысячами жалких забот, тщеславием, жаждой денег, всякими случайностями, причиняющими столько огорчений . Женщины, ласкаемые досыта, ни в чем не нуждаются, ничего не желают, ни о чем не сожалеют……»

22 Apr 2025, 04:10 UTC≈4,530 views7 reactions4 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

👀Глядя в 19 век из 21 века - много «болезней» того времени, от которых ЛЕЧИЛИ, в том числе лоботомией (дырка в черепе по сути) - сейчас выглядят заблуждением и дикостью какой-то . Посмотри на современные а-ля «болезни» - не напоминает ничего???? . Как по мне - современные врачи ничего не лучше и даже хуже, так как их принудительно заставляют пройти через много этапов унижения от поступления в медвузы до дальнейшей тр

🔥51👍1

10 Mar 2025, 13:04 UTC515 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @reshenie_tvoix_problemPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👍52

4 Mar 2025, 03:59 UTC550 views12 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁84

24 Feb 2025, 05:45 UTC≈1,820 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍4🙈2

23 Feb 2025, 14:12 UTC471 viewsread 9 August 2026

Какие качества отличают Мужчину от представителя мужского пола (гендер) ⁉️

22 Feb 2025, 10:05 UTC≈2,280 views12 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я бы задал вопрос по другому исходя из строк Маяковского «Свою Жену я не ругаю. Её никогда я не брошу. Это ведь со мной она стала плохая. А брал то я её хорошей … - СКОЛЬКО ЖЕНЩИН ХОЧЕТ БЫТЬ СТЕРВАМИ И СУКАМИ в семье? - как и мужчин желающих быть дебилами семейного счастья думаю вряд ли много найдется . Баланс от штопанного носка, до мусорного ведра и от каждой копейки и всех оргазмов - должны быть СЕМЕЙНЫМ балансиро

👍11🤝1

11 Dec 2024, 05:39 UTC≈1,600 views11 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026

Путь к сердцу женщины должен как минимум стоять, а не лежать, ну или хотя бы лизать . . . но это не точно - далеко не уползёшь с такой улиткой 🐌 ))

🔥63🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pro_zhizzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Откровения под👠каблучника” (@pro_zhizzz), 97 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_zhizzz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.