Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Re:PETER

Channel

Re:PETER

@repeterpod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

261subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001259932493
TypeChannel
Username@repeterpod
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/repeterpod

Growth

261262261.57 August 2026 — 262 subscribers8 August 2026 — 262 subscribers15 August 2026 — 261 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 261–262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:03261-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:04262no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:14262first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 52s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳3173.8%
🌭1126.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2023 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Apr 2026, 16:39 UTC104 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

SORRY FOR INCONVENIENCING YOU WITH A POAST

🌭4🐳3

20 Apr 2026, 16:54 UTC105 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Case of the mondays? Check this out, i took the 12 day war song and mixed it with kiplings boots , this is the intro. The drop is straight out of 2010 if you were there for "The time"

🌭3🐳2

20 Apr 2026, 16:50 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I did a little stream last night. Its a preview of some stuff I'm working on. I live looped two songs that are part of two seperate video essays/monologues/music videos that I'm working on. Essentially just a bit of an update and Idea of what I'm doing! There are a few glitches and i completely missed the first drop but what ever. I may try to do that first tune again sometime. https://youtu.be/UWha5coLbo0

🌭2🐳2

6 Feb 2026, 22:52 UTC151 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Revelation Ft Greg Arcade FIXED I wasn't happy with how this song turned out when i first put it out. I was reminded of it today and had some time on my hands so i fixed it. Here it is for free/download. If you're interested, i fixed a bit of the arrangement and mixing. There was too much going on in certain spots and some elements were programmed incorrectly. After i cleaned it up i went back and added a few minor

🐳11🌭2

26 Jan 2026, 14:54 UTC175 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Here's a few clips from the other night. This is a live remix of Lana del Rey "Ride"

🐳1

24 Jan 2026, 08:39 UTC158 viewsread 8 August 2026

I spent the night streaming some live remixes I time stamped them all in the description https://youtube.com/live/_MrdQH9VYkE

8 Jan 2026, 21:26 UTC167 viewsread 8 August 2026

wow , there's still some people here? (ish sorta kinda? ) I have a video here , one sec .... If you grew up in the gta or lived there in the 90s/00s you'll appreciate it!

23 Dec 2024, 00:04 UTC488 viewsread 8 August 2026

Here's a Little drummer boy dubstep remix that nobody asked for. https://x.com/repeterpod/status/1870982755624047072

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @repeterpod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,386,298 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Re:PETER” (@repeterpod), 261 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repeterpod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.