Is there an Increase Hatred towards Islām? As much as people push the notion that there’s an increase in hatred towards Islām in today’s times. This really isn’t true. The enmity in the hearts of the disbelievers towards Islām was established 1,400 Years Ago : • Qurʾān 2:120 : “Never will the Jews or Christians be pleased with you, until you follow their faith. Say, ‘Allah’s guidance is the only ˹true˺ guidance.’ …

Channel
Fawāʿid al-ʿIlm | فوائد في العلم
@remindersofilm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
144subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002279849688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @remindersofilm |
| Created | 20 November 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/remindersofilm |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 144 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 140 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 140 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 139 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 20 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 277.8%
- avg views ÷ 144 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 400
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (20 November 2024 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 800 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
The Baby that Wrapped His Arms around my Leg During the Friday Prayer, I placed a water bottle in front of me before starting the prayer. A man brought his small baby with him to the prayer, and stood beside me, placing his child in front of him. The baby took my water bottle immediately and would suckle on the lid, confused as to why he wasn’t able to drink the water. When the Imām got to the end of Sūrah Fatihah…
Sticker, posted without a caption
a Beautiful Pain There’s a type of beauty that is indescribable, found in the pain one experiences that ultimately turns them back to their Lord. When a servant of Allāh falls into sin, it is often followed by a heaviness within the chest: a quiet emptiness, a lingering discomfort that unsettles the heart. Joy begins to fade, replaced by a subtle grief that weighs upon the soul. For the one who reflects, they will…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Stripping Tawḥīd from Ḥakimiyyah Whilst there have been clarifications from scholars that “Tawḥīd al-Ḥakimiyyah” is not its own distinct category of Tawḥīd, their reasoning wasn’t because it had no ties to Tawḥīd, rather because it encompasses the other categories of Tawḥīd already. Thus distinguishing it wouldn’t make sense. Amongst those today, exists those who blood boils when one speaks about the issue of Ḥakim…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Ascribing Victimhood to Women What has become quite prevalent on social media platforms, is the filth both men and women get to behind close doors in private messages when either one side or both sides are accounts that have Daʿwah pages. Often the case, when the man is rightfully exposed, people ascribe “victimhood” to the woman involved when in reality blame should be directed at sisters for entertaining him, sen…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Humiliation of the Ummah The state of this Ummah has not come about except due to our shortcomings wholeheartedly in abandoning the acts that are Farḍ (obligatory) upon us and the overall deviation from Tawḥīd and the correct ʿAqīdah. Included in this without a doubt, is also the deviation of the rulers who have partially abandoned the Sharīʿah - for how can it be that in the land of the muslims, that the systems o…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @remindersofilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 40,250 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fawāʿid al-ʿIlm | فوائد في العلم” (@remindersofilm), 144 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/remindersofilm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.