2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 684–686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 21:51
685
no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:35
685
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
83 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
30
36.1%
❤
28
33.7%
👏
9
10.8%
👍
4
4.82%
🔥
4
4.82%
👌
3
3.61%
😍
2
2.41%
🤔
2
2.41%
❤🔥
1
1.20%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قمت بمشاهدة جزء بسيط من هذا الكورس، لكن توجد قيمة كبيرة في هذا الكورس المجاني، يستحق أن يكون كورسًا مدفوعًا. لكن الأخ كمال نشر الكورس بشكل مجاني، وإن شاء الله سأحاول تلخيص الكورس بشكل كامل. أنصح أي مبتدئ في مجال تصميم الهويات البصرية، سواء كان مستواك متوسطًا أو محترفًا، سوف تستفيد من الكورس https://youtu.be/lbbxs7vbMQY?si=bvYTGl8YfqapdnKj
فيجما تدخل في عالم جديد
عالم الحركة الذي طال انتظاره
استطاعت فيجما بفريقها الإبداعي وإقبال الناس عليها أن تصنع نقلة نوعية في المجال الإبداعي وآخر هذا الإبداع هو إضافة الحركة بشكل مبسط وخفيف يجعلنا نصنع فرقا كبيرا في المخرجات النهائية
أطلقت فيجما بجانب هذا العالم مزايا أكثر وتقوية أكثر لجانب الذكاء الاصطناعي وخصوصا منه جانب الوكيل المساعد الذي يستطيع حتى صنع ملحقات وبرامج مصغرة تعمل داخل فيجما
هل اللون الذي تراه هو اللون الحقيقي فعلًا؟
قد يبدو السؤال غريبًا، لكن أحد أهم الدروس في عالم التصميم جاء من جوزيف ألبيرز في كتابه الشهير "تفاعل الألوان"، حيث أثبت أن:اللون لا يُدرك بمعزل عن محيطه.
بمعنى آخر، اللون نفسه قد يبدو مختلفًا تمامًا بمجرد تغيير الخلفية أو الألوان المجاورة له.
تخيّل مربعًا رماديًا واحدًا:
على خلفية سوداء سيبدو أكثر إشراقًا.
وعلى خلفية بيضاء سيبدو أغمق.المفاجأة؟
إنه نفس اللون تمامًا، بنفس ال…
شركة Levi's المتخصصة بملابس الجينز تملك ملعبًا باسمها. وبما أنها لم تكن الراعي الرسمي لـ #كأس_العالم، فإن الاتحاد الدولي لكرة القدم (FIFA) طلب منها إخفاء شعارها في ملعب ليفاي بطريقة ذكية تغطي الشعار دون الإخلال بهوية الملعب.
لصوص الوقت
مع التطور المستمر في التكنولوجيا وظهور المشتتات بكثرة في الوقت الحالي، مثل الفيديوهات القصيرة ومواقع التواصل والهاتف نفسه، تُعتبر كل هذه الوسائل «لصوصًا» يسرقون وقتك. وكأن لصًا يريد سرقة مالك، فتدله وتضيفه وتكرمه دون أن تشعر. للوقت أهمية كبيرة جدًا؛ فهو لا يتكرر ولا يمكن إرجاعه، وغالبية الناس تكون غافلة بعد فوات الأوان.
في دراسة بسيطة توضح أن معدل استخدام الهاتف للشخص العادي يبلغ حوالي 5 ساعات: لو قمت بضر…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @redadesigner15. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 279,707 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“redadesigner” (@redadesigner15), 685 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redadesigner15.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.