مشروع جديد أعمل عليه في آخر المراحل لتسليمه 👌
❤🔥17👏5🔥2

Channel
@saeeddesginer7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
6,577subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001723652183 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saeeddesginer7 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saeeddesginer7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 6,577 | +8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 6,569 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 6,567 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 6,568 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
98 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 49 | 50.0% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 20.4% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 15.3% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 8.16% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مشروع جديد أعمل عليه في آخر المراحل لتسليمه 👌
❤🔥17👏5🔥2
فيجما تدخل في عالم جديد عالم الحركة الذي طال انتظاره استطاعت فيجما بفريقها الإبداعي وإقبال الناس عليها أن تصنع نقلة نوعية في المجال الإبداعي وآخر هذا الإبداع هو إضافة الحركة بشكل مبسط وخفيف يجعلنا نصنع فرقا كبيرا في المخرجات النهائية أطلقت فيجما بجانب هذا العالم مزايا أكثر وتقوية أكثر لجانب الذكاء الاصطناعي وخصوصا منه جانب الوكيل المساعد الذي يستطيع حتى صنع ملحقات وبرامج مصغرة تعمل داخل فيجما
👍4🔥4👀3
كنت أتصفح مدونة Creative Boom واستوقفني مقال عن رواتب مصممي الجرافيك في عام 2026 المنشور ليس للقلوب الضعيفة 😅 بحسب التقرير: 💰 المصمم المبتدئ (0-2 سنة خبرة): حوالي 2,700 دولار شهرياً. 💰 المصمم المتوسط (3-5 سنوات): حوالي 3,700 دولار شهرياً. 💰 المصمم الخبير (Senior): بين 4,400 و4,700 دولار شهرياً. 💰 المدير الإبداعي (Creative Director): يبدأ من 5,600 دولار شهرياً وقد يتجاوز ذلك بكثير. المقال يؤكد أن المصممين الأعل…
❤🔥17👍6
مقطع جميل للاطلاع https://youtu.be/wT8SzrhsEQ4
❤🔥3
ما زال سوق التصميم الوطن العربي سوقا ناشئا ناميا إلا أنه مع ذلك فقد تطور بشكل كبير جدا وأصبح الطلب كبيرا جدا على المبدعين والمصممين المتخصصين.. إلا أن المشكلة الحقيقية هي في توفر الكفاءات اللازمة... فالسوق واسع جدا وفيه آلاف الفرص ولكن دون خبرات حقيقية... نعم قد تجد لدينا ملايين المصممين ولكن عند التدقيق والتمحيص نرى أن نسبة 10% منهم ربما مؤهل أن يكون مصمما بالمعنى الحقيقي (الإحصائية التقريبية مبنية على نسبة القبول …
❤🔥11👍5🔥2✍1
تعود قصة مطاعم كنتاكي (KFC) Kentucky Fried Chicken، إلى عام 1930 واليوم تضم السلسلة أكثر من 30,000 مطعم في 150 دولة وتحتل المرتبة الثانية بعد ماكدونالدز من حيث المبيعات (❌❌ قاطعوا هذه الشركات القذرة) واليوم قامت كنتاكي اللعينة بتطوير هويتها البصرية وقد قامت بالتطوير شركة JKR الرهيبة كان الشعار النصي القديم جيدًا ولكنه يبدو رسميًا وتميز الخط الجديد بالامتلاء والسماكة أكثر وتحسن أكثر في توازن حرف C ويبدو أن الخط ا…
👏10🤣1
بصراحة هل تقرأ المقالات التي أكتبها أم لا؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
هل هناك علاقة حقيقية بين التصميم والأرباح؟؟ هل فعلا العمل الذي يحسن من تصميمه تزيد أرباحه ومبيعاته؟ هذا ما أجبت عليه في هذه الأسطر القليلة البسيطة وبالأرقام والاحصائيات التي لا تكذب saeedstudio.com/التصميم-والأعمال/
👏1
في عام 2025، احتفلت مايكروسوفت بمرور 50 عامًا على تأسيسها، وطلبت من وكالة Koto الإبداعية تصميم حملة إعلانية بهذه المناسبة. تمزج الحملة بين الحنين إلى الماضي والتفاؤل بالمستقبل، احتفاءً بخمسة عقود من الابتكار. المشروع كاملا من مصدره: koto.com/projects/microsoft-50th
👏4❤🔥1🙏1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @saeeddesginer7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بصراحة هل تقرأ المقالات التي أكتبها أم لا؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 4 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 270,156 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Graphic Desginer | المصمم سعيد الرشيد” (@saeeddesginer7), 6,577 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saeeddesginer7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.