3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 438–444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 20:04
439
-4
20 Aug 2026, 07:16
443
no change
19 Aug 2026, 09:30
443
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 15 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
182 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
62
34.1%
👍
44
24.2%
❤
26
14.3%
💯
22
12.1%
❤🔥
14
7.69%
😍
12
6.59%
👏
2
1.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2024 to 30 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 8 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @realhomestaging. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 September 2024 to 30 September 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Личный бренд одного безупречного эгоиста.
Ждали про Торбосова. Ловите.
Только сначала вспоминаем: У кого на старте были деньги Олега? У сильных, влиятельных, обеспеченных и умных.
Все хотят с ними работать.
Вот теперь смотрим на стратегию
Старт: Дерзкий, с ноги. Хочу порвать к чертям этот рынок и положить на лопатки старые агентства.
О.: Поскольку у многих нет регламента, запрещающего делать дерьмо, они его дел…
По какой причине большинство отдали столько внимания Торбосову до и после Форума?
Там же были и другие мощные и опытные спикеры
Торбосов же холодный, не эмпатичный. Максимум его эмоций - бровь поднять🤨
Остальные спикеры краши нереальные, открытые, поддерживающие, с искренними эмоциями, с теплыми чувствами
Его имя превратило многих в тревожное пирожное, когда увидели его в числе приглашенных спикеров.
Потому что …
Я не знаю, как вы это делаете! Но интуиция у вас классная🔥
Реально, большинство пришло на созвон с запросом по личному бренду и контенту в соцсетях.
И в рамках подготовки к Форуму, ибо какой смысл поездки, знакомств, выступлений и приглашения на свой канал, если он не подготовлен к подписчикам, если вы не раскрыты как интересная Личность, как качественный Эксперт или нет продающих смыслов в контенте.
И в целом, да…
Сейчас будем проверять вашу интуицию?😎✌️
Я перед форумом выставляла пост, где пригласила на созвон несколько человек, у кого давно есть проблема, с которой никак не получалось справиться
Например, нужна обратная связь на вашу концепцию👌
Огромная благодарность за ваш отклик🫶 Желающих было много, но к сожалению со всеми созвониться тогда не могла.
А теперь…
Включайте интуицию!
Угадаете, какой был запрос у большин…
Я всегда топила, топлю и буду топить за уникальность.
Идеально, когда уникальность закладывать во всём - не только в концепции недвижимости, но и в вашем канале и в личном бренде
✔️Если вы уникальный, к вам всегда очередь.
✔️Если к вам очередь, вы можете выбирать с кем вам работать.
✔️Если вы выбираете с кем работать - ваше состояние замечательное (тут много смыслов)
… дальше сами дофантазируйте
Наблюдаю, что п…
За 18 минут можно придумать новую концепцию, но это не точно!
А вот составить план, как докрутить уже готовый кейс к премии получится👍
Как это сделать моему ученику?
Шаг 1. Написать сообщение в чат наставничества, что хочешь подаваться на премию
Шаг 2. На созвоне выстроить стратегию подготовки объекта к премии, внимательно слушая, как можно сделать кейс визуально дороже, используя то, что уже есть и с минимальным…
Через какое время ты попадаешь в число победителей Премии международного форума по маркетингу недвижимости?
Моя ученица Анна Ручкина через 1 созвон со мной на 18 минут😊
Смотреть кейс Анны👇
🔥10❤3❤🔥3👍2👏2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @realhomestaging. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Получить обратную связь по каналу - правильно ли продвигаю Личный бренд41%
Посоветоваться как восстановить внутреннее состояние10%
Пообщаться со звездой10%
Узнать куда сходить в Казани и принимают-ли тут рубли10%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2024 to 30 September 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Yuloo Studio | Студия инвест. ремонта под ключ @yuloo · 76,507 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Hoff @hoff_inspiration · 44,020 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 28 August 2026
Сдавайся на Суточно.ру @sdavajsya · 36,870 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нескучная концепция” (@realhomestaging), 439 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realhomestaging.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
