Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 真不简单

Channel

真不简单

@real_not_simple

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

223subscribers

+55 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004433680424
TypeChannel
Username@real_not_simple
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/real_not_simple

Growth

168223195.525 September 2026 — 168 subscribers3 October 2026 — 223 subscribers25 September 20263 October 2026
2 measurements spanning 8 days, net +55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 160–231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 10:54223+55
25 Sept 2026, 02:22168first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 23 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
156.1%
avg views ÷ 223 subscribers
Avg views / post
348
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held10 (23 September 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total3,482
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC106 viewsread 25 September 2026

佰乐街目前唯一能日的,但是之前去过很多次,不想去了😐

Signed 简简单单

24 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC100 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

艺名:宝儿(百合高颜) 年龄:18 #保真 身高:168cm 体重:46kg 三围:C+ 特点:极品嫩妹,刚下海,声音可爱,听话懂事,前凸后翘,皮肤白嫩光滑,氵多,颜值在线,各种姿势给你带来一种小女友的感觉,更多乐趣等你来开启。 服务:鸳鸯浴,制服黑丝诱惑,#可69,#可舌吻,#加米可无套,姿势配合,激情爱爱。 价格:800一次 地址:#江北区 #佰乐街 联系:@wdcl77(雾都茶楼) 无法私聊雾都茶楼请联系 @WDCL88_bot

Signed 简简单单

24 Sept 2026, 13:29 UTC109 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

艺名:小蜜蜂(百合高颜) 年龄:18 #新人上岗 身高:165cm 体重:46kg 三围:C 特点:极品嫩妹,刚下海,声音可爱,听话懂事,前凸后翘,皮肤白嫩光滑,氵多,颜值在线,各种姿势给你带来一种小女友的感觉,更多乐趣等你来开启。 服务:鸳鸯浴,制服黑丝诱惑,#可69,#可浅吻,#可口爆,姿势配合,激情爱爱。 价格:800一次 地址:#江北区 #佰乐街 联系:@wdcl77(雾都茶楼) 无法私聊雾都茶楼请联系 @WDCL88_bot

Signed 简简单单

23 Sept 2026, 23:50 UTC≈1,650 viewsread 25 September 2026

日逼是千万不能将就,花了大几百去捏着鼻子日,花钱买不好的体验,你对得起你自己的钱吗?好好想想眼前的人真的值这个价格吗?

Signed 简单

23 Sept 2026, 12:17 UTC162 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

微坦,腿粗 矮,稍微好看点,但也就对比之前

Signed 简单

23 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC457 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

身材无敌,奶子很大,很高,可惜脸不好看,粉非常重

Signed 简单

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @real_not_simple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“真不简单” (@real_not_simple), 223 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/real_not_simple.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.