胖虎总结的对,但是不全对我来给兄弟们总结一下 @cjmili这个号已经不是米粒本人了,兄弟们出去擦亮眼睛,千万不要c到终极大坦克该回头一定要回头这种卖高价批应该打击! #投稿 via 匿名 由 @Cqshudongbot 自助投稿🫡

Channel
重庆||故事汇 5.0
@cqgs5
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37,283subscribers
+3,736 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003294534255 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cqgs5 |
| Description | 吃瓜频道 故事分享 重庆抗压吧 欢迎投稿 电报趣事 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cqgs5 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 37,283 | +175 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 37,108 | +271 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 36,837 | +205 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 36,632 | +212 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 36,420 | +155 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 36,265 | +125 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 36,140 | +244 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 35,896 | +166 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 35,730 | +157 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 35,573 | +192 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 35,381 | +195 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 35,186 | +155 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 35,031 | +294 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 34,737 | +333 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 34,404 | +254 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 34,150 | +243 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 33,907 | +118 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 33,789 | +86 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 33,703 | +85 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 33,618 | first reading |
Engagement
124 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.6%
- avg views ÷ 37,283 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,940
- 124 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.163%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 124
- of 124 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 118 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 124 (6 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 488,536 |
| Reactions total | 770 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,420
- Videos
- ≈191
- Links
- ≈37
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 09s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
770 reactions across 114 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 182 | 23.6% | |
| ❤ | 172 | 22.3% | |
| 🗿 | 119 | 15.5% | |
| 🤓 | 116 | 15.1% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 6.88% | |
| 🤡 | 24 | 3.12% | |
| 👎 | 19 | 2.47% | |
| 💩 | 16 | 2.08% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 1.95% | |
| 🤮 | 11 | 1.43% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 1.17% | |
| 🖕 | 8 | 1.04% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.909% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 0.909% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.649% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 770reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
第一,1.6米多一个1.7米多一个C罩杯一个e罩杯,而且频道里面用的还是以前米粒的胸围照片 第二,往上翻一翻就能看到这个中介类似破防,用米粒的号骗别人的定金,别人把截图都甩出来了,然后他解释也没有解释,一直在那里阴阳怪气并不能把你所作所为盖过去,如果真的不是你收的,请把截图发出来把证据发出来,不是你一个人靠嘴说的,我只是单纯觉得现在黑中介都这么牛逼了吗?大坦克还开600不得不佩服,刚刚我私聊他,他还跟我说是换人了,我这边可以发截图给兄弟们看,他现在又说还是本人,利用文字游戏在和我们摆龙门阵,自己都给自己说漏嘴了😄😄。 第三,就像你那三个好在下面评论说的一样,就算真的是什么25以上什么老木木什么的,那也是你随机把单子推给别人了,因为你们黑中介就是两头吃, 总结一下两头吃坑完妹子坑客人他是在想玩文字游戏,把方向带偏,你没有骗别人的定金吗?还在群里说是自己骗的兄弟们喊你发截图你都发不出来,还说你自己好心补给客人的,故事会里面的曝光两三…
❤1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6738620001
❤1
首先第一点,我刚刚投稿没有1分钟,下面直接有一张三张的电脑截图,答案只有一点,就是你现在在用米粒的号的中介,但是人换人了 第二点就是,米粒身高1.72米只多少最多就130,140斤的样子都不可能有150,你就是中介本人无疑,肯定是跟米粒洗脑没成功破防了,把别人号也拿走了 第三点,米粒不可能25以上的脱了衣服十几和20级我还是分得清的所以更加能证明 第四,我看了现在的这个米粒和原来那个根本就不是一个风格 1.62米130斤,现在的所谓“米粒”才是个坦克吧,还是个个终极坦克,以前那个米粒才开500,现在开600,真的是还是黑中介,还有就是我观察了两天,这个号现在也不止是有这个终极坦克一个人,一会儿一个菜单900,一会儿一个菜单600,我刚刚发现故事会上面还有投稿,又是在成都开,又是在重庆,已经有不少狼友发现了,关键是完全不是一个类型啊,还开600真的不照镜子的,大群上的还是用原来的米粒的照片,笑死人了,你发的那些胸都是原来的米粒吧…
以前来重庆也找过米粒,这次私信他给我发的菜单就不是一个人了,但是大群里面还是她本人,这个号不明显就是中介拉皮条吗?,重庆的中介都这么猖狂了吗?我问他原来那个呢,他说不要了😂😂,给客服说客服已读不回,总之避雷吧,兄弟们,还有就是原来那个米粒是上岸了吗?有没有老哥知道 #投稿 via 匿名 由 @Cqshudongbot 自助投稿🫡
❤3😁1
该说的也说完了,该通知的群友也通知过了,大白兔那边不定时举报再被逮到可不怪我了啊,我该改名了,祝大家cj顺利 #投稿 via 避雷重庆大白兔 由 @Cqshudongbot 自助投稿🫡
👍6❤1🐳1🤓1
喜欢的人在七夕跟别人在一起了,感觉很痛苦,在想为什么她可以这么轻松的释怀,怀着报复还有猎奇的心理,这周第1次出击了,可是出击完之后心里一直是空落落的,感觉自己再也配不上她了,老师服务态度很好,人也很漂亮,但是做的时候感觉一点也不爽,还不如打飞机,我感觉更需要的是灵魂上的交流,以后估计也不会再出击了,真的挺后悔的,还没迈出这一步的,建议三思而后行 #投稿 via 匿名 由 @Cqshudongbot 自助投稿🫡
❤3🐳1🤓1
@cqmili 避雷他妈的这个叫米粒的,这个比以前在成都开900,现在跑来重庆开600,这个账号换人了,不是原来的那个 #投稿 via 匿名 由 @Cqshudongbot 自助投稿🫡
🐳4🤓1
我们重庆的狼友就这么傻逼吗? #投稿 via 匿名 由 @Cqshudongbot 自助投稿🫡
🐳1🤓1
前情提要: 避雷,大白兔家新人棉花糖,顺带着大白兔家可能最好也是别去了 人照差不太多,看得出硬件条件一般,但比较符合我的审美,进门聊了两句倒是问题不大,性格感觉还行,遂交钱开始。洗澡时说自己口腔溃疡了,不能大蟒蛇,我本来也没奔着这个去就没在意。 随后开始口,口活是真的非常差,很别扭,而且没口几下就说要开始,我说行,我想的是这口活太差了别受罪了。 然后,带套不会带!你说你新下海,不会,没关系,这个我自己来。 女上起手,动了十几下明显就体力不支了,也有可能开始敷衍了,这时候我已经有点烦躁了,直接后入,输出一会打算换传教士,刚一停下的一瞬间她就回头问我射了?我当时就有点想骂人,还是耐着性子说换姿势,然后就在这几秒钟她居然还得看下手机,怎么的是打算摇人仙人跳了?然后换姿势也得我教怎么换,怎么躺,我他妈是来消费了还是搞教学来了啊?最后想着女上结束算了,最离谱的就来了,动两下就起来一下,然后再进去动两下又起来,这玩啥呢?直接做不下去了,遂联…
❤6👍3🐳1🤓1
哎…一点微薄之力
👍16👎13❤1🐳1🤓1
兄弟们,避雷@nanyuxlin这个人,黑心中介,愿者上钩 #投稿 via 匿名 由 @Cqshudongbot 自助投稿🫡
🐳2❤1🗿1🤓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @cqgs5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
出击是为了什么?
- 压抑,单纯的泄火41%
- 集邮,收集各种美女25%
- 爱情,老师爱上我,她不一样7%
- 放纵,就像放纵自己15%
- 瘾大,每天不日鸡鸡痒21%
- 孤独,缺爱,需要陪伴10%
- 钱多,没有别的花钱地方11%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cqgs5 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 18 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 14 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“重庆||故事汇 5.0” (@cqgs5), 37,283 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cqgs5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.