https://www.wired.com/story/how-ai-agents-plunged-tech-world-into-chaos/ 关于 Claude Code 和 OpenClaw 如何开启计算机历史上可能最大一次变革的权威故事。

Channel
值得一看的文章
@readgoods
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
784subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001230143214 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @readgoods |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/readgoods |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 784 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 786 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 786 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 55.6% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2023 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/08/technology/apple-ceo-tim-cook-john-ternus.html
[Ports, Rails, Roads, and Orbits](https://www.nfx.com/post/ports-roads-rails-orbits) 历史上每一次交通革命,都遵循同一个规律: 技术突破 → 成本暴跌 → 普及民主化 → 诞生没人预料到的新行业 → 地缘权力重洗 而且每次,当时的人都没有意识到真正的影响在哪里。
布兰德将这些宏伟的抱负与以人为本的赋权精神结合起来。《全球概览》的标语是“获取工具”,其含义非常广泛。这本厚重的巨型目录于 1968 年首次出版,列出了各种供新兴社群居民使用的实物工具——从播种机到鞋类,从皮划艇到花边编织工具包——但它也推崇关于各种嬉皮时代兴趣的书籍:深奥的宗教、社会学、建筑、哲学、科学、神秘学、如何与海豚交流,应有尽有。布兰德指出,思想也是工具。因此,《全球概览》提供了接触多种另类生活方式的途径。他说:“它为人们打开了大门,让他们思考‘也许我可以自己造一把吉他,或者过上离网生活。’因此,它产生了赋予人们自主权的影响。” https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/feb/25/tech-legend-stewart-brand-on-musk-bezos-and-his-extraordinary-life-we-dont-need-to-passively-ac…
最近OpenClaw很火,如果你没时间了解由其衍生出来的Moltbook,可以看看这篇文章,给到了一些典型的例子 https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/best-of-moltbook
Claude CEO 达里奥成长史 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/vULQSQy2Ye4HYqKVdYSKTA
👍1
OpenAI的野心与困境:一场AI革命的幕后故事 https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/1908991295281689928
👍2
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/HBFbQ2CJit5qh3VB4FHCkA
👍1
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/EwIwd0mYwP7WJMYKye4KEw
做了一个付费栏目,主要想回答下这些问题: 为什么听了很多道理,依然过不好这一生? 如何确定自己在乎? 如何确定自己喜欢什么? 如何喜欢自己 如何从悲伤的情绪里恢复过来 如何培养习惯 如何做决定,做不后悔的决定 如何管理自己的情绪 如何connect the dots 如何让自己获得激情 如何与原生家庭和解 如何不去做自我内耗? 如何建立好的人际关系? 如何界定自己的能力圈? 如何挖掘自己的潜力? 如何正确的思考所面对的问题 如何摆脱焦虑 如何对人和事情做出自己的判断? 如何区分身体和大脑的渴望 如何区分真实和戴面具的你 如何修改不正确的观念 选择恐惧症怎么破? 我该拿我的拖延症怎么办? 如何结束一段关系? 如何不再担心他们是否喜欢你? 付费栏目具体介绍可以查看 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/gK99ORwhKLfNzOS-JcygvA
❤1👍1
“桑达尔是谷歌的鲍尔默,”一位工程师解释道。 “所有这些产品都不起作用、蔓延、过度招聘。这一切都发生在他的任期内。”
员工们描绘了一幅更加黯淡的景象这家公司的形象比经常报道的要多:谷歌是一家失控、印钞的搜索垄断企业,没有远见,没有领导力,而且由于其极其孤立的文化,对团队之间正在发生的事情没有真正的了解。连接员工的唯一因素是一个强大的、庞大的人力资源官僚机构,是的,它完全痴迷于左翼政治教条。但公司的狂热分子之所以能够蓬勃发展,是因为没有其他权力来源可以主张、甚至试图主张任何有意义的影响力。几乎每个与我交谈过的人都使用“恐惧文化”这个词,这不仅是为了解释该公司缺乏对最疯狂的 DEI 过度行为的抵制,也是为了解释为什么缺乏来自可能是最集中的才华横溢的技术人员的创新 https://www.piratewires.com/p/google-culture-of-fear
❤2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @readgoods. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“值得一看的文章” (@readgoods), 784 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/readgoods.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.