Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

一方天地

@world2us

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,177subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001178032482
TypeChannel
Username@world2us
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/world2us

Growth

1,1771,1801,178.58 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,177 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,177–1,180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:541,177-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:401,180no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:161,180first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 1,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (23 April 202629 July 2026)
Views total588
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
466.7%
👍233.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026

刚刚在一个讨论游戏去实体化的内容下面看到说, “影碟活到现在完全是一件不可思议的事情。” 想了想,确实不明白哪些人在买影碟!他们是在买 4k 蓝光收藏吗? 就像一些喜欢黑胶的朋友那样? 不过几年前,我也在买实体漫画书作为收藏来着

Signed zac

27 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC173 viewsread 8 August 2026

分享内容(文章、梗图、音乐)是成本极低的方式,背后的潜台词其实是“我看到了这个,并想到了你”。

Signed zac

23 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC285 viewsread 8 August 2026

克里斯托弗·诺兰说:“AI 是一匹特洛伊木马,每个人都知道里面藏着希腊人。” “这是一匹透明的马,它是用玻璃做的。每个人都能看到里面发生了什么……我从未见过一种技术进步如此之快,却被公众如此彻底地拒绝。 每个人对它的怀疑都如此极端,尤其是年轻人。”

Signed zac

23 Jun 2026, 07:54 UTC482 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

根据得到的颜色——天青, claude 还帮我写了一篇文章《雨中的天青》,文章里没有一个字是我写的,我也没有安排,可能是测试时候留下的。但基本就是整个事件的描述了。 然后,我上周利用 claude design就把博客改造了下,补上了一些内容。 当然,有些依然只是占了一个页面,但 AI 让其看起来非常自然。 只能说,现在弄博客网站真简单呀。

Signed zac

14 Jun 2026, 10:04 UTC456 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

可以试试问下 claude\chatgpt,下面这个问题: 根据我的写作的内容和关注的内容,以及 notion 上的内容,你觉得可以用什么颜色来形容我?? 推荐使用 claude,我使用 claude code 得到了下面的回答。 它会给你生成一张图片(可能是有意境的图)。 然后给出解释: 琥珀是树脂历经千万年,包裹万物、缓慢凝固而成的东西。它不是被开采的矿石,是被沉淀出来的。这恰好就是你—— 沉淀性。 你的整个 Notion 就是一块正在形成的琥珀:把读过的书、研究过的公司、想过的念头,一点点滴落、包裹、封存。八年没停。 透明而裹着东西。 琥珀是透的,但里面总封着一只虫、一片叶——你从不收集抽象的"知识",你收集的是具体的、鲜活的:某家公司的财报细节、某段播客的高光、帕斯卡尔的某一句。 温暖。 它是暖色。对应你的人文、你的温柔、"LLM helps me enjoy life"、你守着"写给自己的字不要自动化"。

Signed zac

9 Jun 2026, 04:31 UTC358 viewsread 8 August 2026

自 AI出现以来,你为自己制作了哪些工具? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48449187

Signed zac

5 Jun 2026, 04:14 UTC376 viewsread 8 August 2026

# 如何理解时机?|人间松弛指南 时机不是机会,是弩机扣扳机的那一瞬——外部窗口与内部状态的完美咬合,带着不可逆的保质期。我们错过它,无非四种病:完美主义的拖延、经验主义的傲慢、跑太快成先烈、沉没成本挪不动脚。大师们不狂妄,只敬畏:时机不可创造,不可预测,只能判断自己在周期的哪个位置,然后带着那个让你尴尬的半成品,在门关上之前先挤进去。 👉 https://newsletter.emmmme.com/p/how-to-understand-timing-relaxation-guide?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=newsletter

Signed QuailSenderBot

28 May 2026, 12:06 UTC329 viewsread 8 August 2026

做了一个散步的 app Mangata 是一个安静的 Color Walk 散步记录 App。 选择一种颜色,出门走一段路。你可以拍下途中遇见的颜色、光线、植物、街角和小物。走完以后,Mangata 会把这次散步整理成一份本地记录:照片、时长、距离、路线、地点和手记。 它不是运动打卡工具,也不要求你完成目标。你只需要慢慢走,留意眼前的颜色,把一次普通散步保存下来。 https://apps.apple.com/cn/app/mangata/id6762563476 贴 5 个年度会员的优惠码,有兴趣可以试试 NW3YE64WH344LFXTKY 76M733LJXHNTNJAPP7 MFJET763R7KTXE3YNK A6FJ7NR8JNJ3MLJNRJ YATAT7KYTN873NKP4W

Signed zac

28 May 2026, 06:12 UTC280 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

最具原创性的语言正在退回到“私人市场”中。 在 Substack、Signal 对话串、Discord 服务器和私人备忘录里,新的表达形式正在半匿名、高上下文的环境中被测试。它们相当于语言领域里的风险投资和私募股权,是充满风险、稀缺性和高度集中注意力的空间。 就像现在的公司会避免过早上市一样,写作者也可能推迟,甚至拒绝公开发布自己的作品,因为他们担心作品被稀释,或者被他人挪用。 只有当一个想法成熟之后,它才可能“IPO”到公共领域,也许是一条爆火推文、一篇宣言,或者一个文化短语。 但即便如此,它的寿命也很有限:LLM 很快就会把它压平,变成贝塔。 https://contraptions.venkateshrao.com/p/llms-as-index-funds

👍1

Signed zac

21 May 2026, 14:55 UTC291 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

原来丁丁历险记的丁丁英文是 TinTin,感觉英文名用这个蛮好

Signed zac

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @world2us. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 416,841 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“一方天地” (@world2us), 1,177 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/world2us.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.