11 Jul 2026, 01:34 UTC385 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
R.O.D.
@read_or_dead
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
728subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001106026059 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @read_or_dead |
| Created | 1 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/read_or_dead |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 728 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 730 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 730 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
11 Jul 2026, 00:35 UTC367 viewsread 6 August 2026
小说点子 用时刻表和延迟等写一个只有铁道宅会高兴的本格推理 但我不是铁道宅所以
7 Jun 2026, 01:36 UTC567 viewsread 6 August 2026
文笔是一个传输工具，将写作的人心中的景象传递给读者。失真越少则文笔越好。写给幼儿的书如果花团锦簇反而是文笔差。 我总是会纠结于如何提升文笔，可能是陷入了误区，真正应该做的是耕作心中的景象。是否细腻，是否有趣，最重要的事情是有没有一股迫不及待想要传达给读者的热情。羡慕别人的文笔无济于事，我不会成为另一个人。 （作为补充，和文字打交道本身就是一种耕作心中景象的优秀手段，所以也不是特别大的误区。不过要明确目的和手段，目的还是让心更丰富。） 这也是为什么LLM在遣词造句上可以做到顶尖，但写出来的东西却让人皱眉的原因，顺着精致的文字我们本来会预期到背后有同样丰盛的心灵世界，但读完了发现是一片空无。
29 May 2026, 00:50 UTC609 viewsread 6 August 2026
https://ckarchive.com/b/wvu2hghk5m82zf9r552rqtn34kzxxc8
20 May 2026, 12:20 UTC725 viewsread 6 August 2026
好像黄金在宇宙都是珍惜的元素。 听到这件事就想，如果太空歌剧里面不同文明都用金币来结算岂不是很有意思。
17 May 2026, 17:45 UTC736 viewsread 6 August 2026
超级暴论 这是一个精神上的后启式录世界。原本许诺的全球化、民主等价值的扩散和地球村未来破灭。宏大叙事破灭了又破灭以后人类找不出新的想象，只能剥下死去价值观的皮，拒绝承认和哀悼而是套在身上Cosplay。普通人要么退居在个人间的小同温层美其名曰重建身边要么拒斥整个进步的概念退居到幻想中的往昔。人和人缺乏社会组织，碎片，无法作为群体行动，只有浪潮一样无结构的网络暴力可以组织起力量。由人亲手建造的巨大的物体决定着我们，甚至不必以很聪明或者很邪恶的方式。推荐系统控制着我们看什么，人的创作因为生成式AI而逐渐丢失意义，原本能作为手艺和技艺的活动意义逐渐干扁。就像逐渐没有氧气的水族馆里的鱼，在无尽的看不到出口的End Game垃圾时间里徘徊。
12 May 2026, 16:39 UTC706 viewsread 6 August 2026
感觉看大量预告片是一个很好找灵感来源的方式，用力想象的话
6 May 2026, 17:38 UTC808 viewsread 6 August 2026
N年后的补充，可以看看 The Book of Why
28 Apr 2026, 08:15 UTC866 viewsread 6 August 2026
Nobody tells this to people who are beginners, I wish someone told me. All of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there is this gap. For the first couple years you make stuff, it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not. But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot o…
27 Apr 2026, 17:37 UTC605 viewsread 6 August 2026
#设定点子 铁道奇幻。现实被铁道和车站稳定，离车站远一点的地方现实不稳定会出现怪物人类无法定居。 有点类似《终末列车去哪里》的感觉，但是在铁路和站点附近还是能维持稳定的现实，而且还有不同的线路人们会换乘什么的。 谁在运营铁道？ 怪物会侵入吗？ 不同的线路有什么区别？ 换乘站有没有冒险者工会？会飞上银河吗？ 具体需要铁道宅协助设定。由于我不是铁道宅所以并不想写这个设定。
7 Apr 2026, 11:24 UTC771 viewsread 6 August 2026
可证伪性不是科学的充分或者必要条件，但是是一种「美德」。
3 Apr 2026, 11:58 UTC899 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PlayAndMake
对话乌克兰战火中的游戏开发者 https://www.chuapp.com/article/291284.html
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @read_or_dead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 865,220 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“R.O.D.” (@read_or_dead), 728 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/read_or_dead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.