Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

РАВНО ЛИ..?

@ravnoli

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

201subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002205576589
TypeChannel
Username@ravnoli
DescriptionГде заканчивается одно и начинается другое?
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ravnoli

Growth

2018 Aug 2026, 23:01 — 201 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:15 — 201 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:018 Aug 2026, 23:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 200–202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:15201no change
8 Aug 2026, 23:01201first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 19 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
32
Videos
13
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
57s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

288 reactions across 14 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8429.2%
❤‍🔥5218.1%
👍5117.7%
🔥4616.0%
👏279.38%
🍓51.74%
🥰51.74%
😍41.39%
🙉41.39%
💋20.694%
💔20.694%
10.347%
🎉10.347%
😁10.347%
😇10.347%
🥴10.347%
🫡10.347%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2025 to 18 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
122
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 14 we hold a reading for · 64%
Most on one post
113
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ravnoli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 January 2025 to 18 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Feb 2025, 12:00 UTC591 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Надеемся, вы уже посмотрели наш праздничный выпуск, и, если у вас возникали какие-то вопросы, наши эксперты смогли на них ответить! А теперь узнаем побольше про наших замечательных девушек-психологов 🫶🏻 И оставляем ссылку на тгк Екатерины Лебедевой, где она делится своими наблюдениями, подкрепленными с точки зрения психологии 🙌🏻

11🔥6👍31🍓1💋1🥰1

14 Feb 2025, 15:30 UTC875 views29 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Горячая тема: «РЕВНОСТЬ = ЛЮБОВЬ?» ❤️‍🔥 Разбираемся в хитросплетениях чувств с точки зрения психологии! Правда ли, что ревность - показатель настоящей любви? Или это тревожный звоночек, говорящий о проблемах в отношениях? В новом выпуске мы ищем ответы на эти вопросы, обсуждая все грани ревности и разбирая реальные истории людей. Устраивайтесь поудобнее, заваривайте чашечку чая (или чего покрепче) и приготовьтесь

👏137🔥4💔2❤‍🔥1🍓1💋1

14 Feb 2025, 10:30 UTC627 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Дорогие наши подписчики, в первую очередь хотим поздравить вас с Днём любви 🥰 В этот день мы выражаем свою любовь и признательность тем, кто нам дорог! В честь сегодняшнего праздника наша команда решила посвятить неделю ревности и обсудить, как она связана с любовью ❤️‍🩹 Наши спикеры - Екатерина Лебедева и Алина Разина - постарались ответить на все вопросы с психологической точки зрения. Ждите полный выпуск, он у

❤‍🔥95👍4🥰3🍓1🫡1

12 Feb 2025, 15:30 UTC388 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9❤‍🔥3👍3

11 Feb 2025, 11:15 UTC383 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Что думаете: ревность и любовь - РАВНО ЛИ?

  1. Да21%
  2. Нет79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8🙉4🔥3😇1

11 Feb 2025, 11:15 UTC399 views20 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Давно нас не было, правда?) Но после длительного перерыва мы пришли к вам с очень интригующей темой для следующего выпуска подкаста 🤫 Давайте сегодня погрузимся в мир отношений и обсудим вопрос «Ревность = любовь?» ❤️‍🩹 С одной стороны, многие считают, что небольшая ревность - это признак небезразличия, доказательство того, что человек боится потерять вас. Но, с другой стороны, ревность часто является проявлением

👍95❤‍🔥3👏1🔥1😁1

28 Jan 2025, 18:16 UTC≈1,020 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Интервью с Shadow_Tide: О жизни профессионала в киберспорте 🎮 На этой неделе мы погружаемся в мир киберспорта, чтобы ответить на главный вопрос: РАВНО ЛИ? И сегодня мы начинаем с разговора с ex. XSEN Иваном Яковлевым - профессиональным игроком в Dota2 🔥 Выпуск на эту тему уже доступен по ссылке на нашем YouTube канале!

👍97🔥6

26 Jan 2025, 12:45 UTC484 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Poll

Киберспорт и спорт - РАВНО ЛИ?

  1. Да43%
  2. Нет57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥83❤‍🔥2🥴1

26 Jan 2025, 12:45 UTC433 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Киберспорт - это спорт или просто развлечение? 🎮 Киберспорт - командное или индивидуальное соревнование на основе компьютерных или видеоигр. С одной стороны, игроки тратят время и энергию, тренируя навыки и разрабатывая стратегии за звание лучших. Можно ли отрицать уровень мастерства, стоящий за победами в киберспорте? Мы так не думаем! Но, с другой стороны, многие указывают на отсутствие традиционной физической а

🔥53👍3❤‍🔥2👏1

25 Jan 2025, 13:01 UTC383 views29 reactions113 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня поздравляем с днём рождения нашу очаровательную Полину!🩷 Наш сценарист, SMM-специалист и просто красотка🔥 Поля, мы желаем тебе всегда оставаться такой же позитивной, открытой и никогда не бояться открывать новые горизонты! Накидаем праздничных реакций?)

👏10❤‍🔥6😍43🍓2🎉1👍1🔥1

25 Jan 2025, 11:25 UTC372 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥8🔥52👏2

22 Jan 2025, 15:15 UTC409 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Poll

А какой формат книг вам ближе?

  1. Электронные книги / аудио24%
  2. Бумажные книги76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9👍4🔥3❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ravnoli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Feb 2025, 11:15 UTCAnonymous Poll76 voters

Что думаете: ревность и любовь - РАВНО ЛИ?

  1. Да21%
  2. Нет79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jan 2025, 12:45 UTCAnonymous Poll68 voters

Киберспорт и спорт - РАВНО ЛИ?

  1. Да43%
  2. Нет57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jan 2025, 15:15 UTCAnonymous Poll58 voters

А какой формат книг вам ближе?

  1. Электронные книги / аудио24%
  2. Бумажные книги76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2025 to 18 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 770,565 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РАВНО ЛИ..?” (@ravnoli), 201 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ravnoli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.