Channel
@rassvetLoVR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
150subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004458237351 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rassvetLoVR |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 17 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rassvetLoVR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 150 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 150 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (17 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,505 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 30.7% | |
| 🤬 | 23 | 30.7% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 18.7% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 9.33% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Добрый день. 31 июля ТИК Мотовилихинского района приняла решение отказать в регистрации. Можно долго рассуждать о причинах, есть и надуманные решения ТИК по подписным листам, но есть и моя ошибка. Сейчас готовлю иск в суд, очень нужна помощь юриста, надежда на удовлетворение есть, но в настоящих условиях думаю решение будет отказать. Но это тоже будет опыт .
🤬10
Photo, posted without a caption
🤬8💔1
❗️Публикуем списки кандидатов в депутаты Государственной Думы IX созыва от партии «Яблоко»: 🟢Федеральный список (269 кандидатов: семь человек в общефедеральной части и еще 262 — в составе 70 региональных групп). 🟢135 кандидатов в одномандатных округах. Среди кандидатов федерального списка 72% мужчин и 28% женщин, 80,5% имеют высшее образование, а 20 человек (7%) — ученую степень кандидата наук. Средний возраст ка…
🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
Вот она, плодотворная работа избирательной комиссии. Ни одной подсказки кандидату. Читай законы, постановления, инструкции, и не дай бог где-то точку не поставишь! Не быть тебе кандидатом.
🤬5❤1😱1
Сегодня опять посетил комиссию в администрации. Вручили уведомление, что завтра выдадут протокол по подписным листам.Вручили уведомление об ошибках в поданных документах. Не правильно оформлен 1 финансовый отчёт и не подписал банковскую справку. Ведь когда отдавал спрашивал, так пойдет, председатель ТИК кивнула головой. Завтра исправлю, если пойму, что не так, форму брал в законе ПК. Бюрократия на высшем уровне! Бор…
🔥5❤2🙏2
Вот так закончилась комиссия, результат 28 июля. Из доклада вроде понятно , что 187 подписей соответствуют, а надо было минимум 186. Думаю полиция подтвердит прописку остальных 17 , как всегда списки избирателей наверное не откорректированы
❤3🔥2🕊2
Video, posted without a caption
👍5🙏2❤1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJeKFCLuRrU Случайно попалась в рекомендации, рекомендую послушать на фоне/досуге
🔥2
💭Несвободное слово: как принимались законы, ограничивающие свободу мнения и информации Согласно Конституции, свобода мысли и слова является одним из основополагающих прав российских граждан. Между тем, по подсчётам проекта Думабинго, действующий созыв Госдумы принял не менее 59 законов, в той или иной степени ограничивающих это право. В недавно вышедшем докладе были рассмотрены пять наиболее резонансных из них. 🔒…
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7
Сегодня завершил сбор подписей, проехал по 1 Вышке, какие интересные люди, какие прекрасные участки, цветы, кустарники и интересные люди. Все с душой . Пили кофе, домой привез свежие свои помидоры и огурчики.Улица Труда, ехал на автомобиле, сегодня камень попал в стекло, по стеклу пошла трещина, но тротуар отличный! Прекрасный центр притяжения ТОС, ещё не был ,но планирую. Буду готовить протокол и на неделе в избирко…
❤6👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @rassvetLoVR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 583,768 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Я иду на выборы в думу Пермского края” (@rassvetLoVR), 150 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rassvetLoVR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.