Channel
@rasfocusgroup
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
929subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002716454311 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rasfocusgroup |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rasfocusgroup |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @rasfocusgroup/117 · this entry16 Jun 2026, 16:03 UTC | @personalstrategy2025/38716 Jun 2026, 16:03 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @personalstrategy2025/3946 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC | @rasfocusgroup/128 · this entry6 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @personalstrategy2025/39510 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC | @rasfocusgroup/129 · this entry10 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @personalstrategy2025 | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (8–5) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @rasfocusgroup — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 929 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 932 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 937 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 938 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 936 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:50 | 941 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 941 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
102 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 42.2% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.92% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 2.94% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.98% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что нужно хотеть, чтобы получать сверхрезультаты? В субботу мы с Юлей Ивлиевой провели эфир про опыт сверхрезультатов — путь до миллиарда, подводные камни на этом пути, убеждения и подходы, которые к этому привели. Эфир зашёл: я получил больше 25 отзывов в личку — инсайты, благодарности. А ведь проводили его в закрытом формате, только для клиентов. Вчера мы с Юлей решили: продолжаем. Будет цепочка эфиров — для тех…
❤3🔥1
Я работаю с действительно большими экспертами и большими системами, и вижу одну закономерность: Самые влиятельные мастера не продают метод. Не продают курс. Не продают технологию. Они продают свой мир. Буквально создают свою реальность, в которой хочется жить им и их последователям. А знаете кто лучше всех создавал и шерил свою картину мира со своими послежователями всех за всю историю человечества? Религии. Те…
❤6🔥2
Больше заявки на продукт по Картине мира и Религиями мы не собираем. Краткие итоги по мини-группе для авторов мировоззрения: 107 заявок на 20 мест. Уже послезавтра будем разбирать инструменты, на которых веками держатся религии и секты, и брать оттуда то, что работает. 5 августа ранний старт. И, как всегда, люди, которые откликнулись, потрясающие. Для себя я делаю простой вывод: занимайтесь тем, что вам искренне …
🔥3
Вся моя карьера эксперта - это один большой творческий эксперимент. Я беру всё, что мне по-настоящему интересно, и превращаю в полезное знание. Как устроены религии? Как работают государства? Как устроен наш мозг и почему мы принимаем именно такие решения, а не другие? Из этого рождаются инструменты, и дальше они идут в реальные бизнесы участников. Вчера мы закрыли 12 мест из 20 в мини-группу для авторов мировозз…
🔥1
Вчера написал про картину мира. Получил кучу сообщений в личку. Но сразу скажу честно: то, что готовим, подойдёт не всем. Кому-то пока рано. И дело не в красивой метафоре про религии. Мы с Александром больше двух лет разбираем, буквально по кирпичикам, как из ничего, из разрозненных людей, без общего языка, без общей истории, собираются структуры, которые живут веками. Как Италия, где ещё 150 лет назад соседние р…
🔥4👍1
Остановитесь на секунду и задумайтесь. Любой крупный эксперт, любой большой бизнес, любая система влияния — продают одно и то же. За 10 лет работы с экспертами я видел это снова и снова. Те, кто реально зарабатывает своей головой, не продают метод. Не технологию. Не курс. Они продают картину мира. Своё ощущение реальности. Свой взгляд на людей, деньги, влияние. Не заимствованный. Не скопированный. Собственный. З…
❤2
Эра маркетплейсов закончится, толком не начавшись. Если хоть немного следите за агентской экономикой — вы уже понимаете, к чему я веду. К 2030 году в большинстве сегментов 80% покупок будут проходить напрямую через нейросети. И совершать их будут сами нейросети. Скоро ChatGPT будет держать вашу карту, сам делать покупки, сам курировать доставку. Люди просто перестанут заходить на маркетплейсы. Произойдёт это не в…
🔥5💯4
Мы все строим бизнес, создаём продукты, делимся контентом. Но редко задаём себе вопрос: а кем человек себя называет, когда приходит к нам? Вчера закончился мой трёхдневный тренинг. И я поймал себя на мысли, которую хочу разобрать публично. Есть исследование, за которое дали Нобелевскую премию по экономике. Учёные выяснили, что помимо денег, комфорта и безопасности, у человека есть четвёртый вид мотивации — идентифи…
❤4🔥3👍1
Выступал сегодня в Ростове и в какой-то момент поймал себя на мысли, которую давно знаю, но каждый раз заново удивляюсь: люди путают доход с видением. Кажется, что доход — это отдельная метрика. Что-то про продажи, трафик, воронки. На самом деле доход — это просто зеркало твоего видения. На сколько лет вперёд ты умеешь видеть свою траекторию — столько ты и зарабатываешь. Не больше. Видение — это навык, а не вдохно…
❤3
У меня есть аудитория из Ростова?) Хочу живую встречу организовать тут 1.07 Буду рад увидеться, пообщаться - https://t.me/+7n1TDBb4PltkZjcy
🎧Записал для вас еще один подкаст и решил завтра раскрыть его подробнее, проведу открытую лекцию в 12:00 Тема лекции: почему «больше аудитории» не равно «больше денег». Разберём: — как 15% клиентов покупают всё, а 85% только ходят на бесплатное — как найти и удержать свой работающий сегмент — что делать с теми, кто «хочет, но не покупает» — где грань между нишевой и массовой моделью Если зарабатываете неплохо, но …
❤5
🎧Подкаст про самую важную метрику в бизнесе для экспертов и образовательных предпренимателей, которой никто не уделяет внимание
🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rasfocusgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Смысловая идентичность” (@rasfocusgroup), 929 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rasfocusgroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.